Photos of the F-35 Lightning II roll-out

Discuss photos, special paintschemes and serial numbers of the F-35
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 380
Joined: 12 Mar 2005, 12:11

by Destro » 08 Jul 2006, 15:03

The paint scheme is gonna change over time too, especially if they sell it (the airplane) to other countries.
WTF Over!


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 917
Joined: 29 Sep 2004, 04:24

by TenguNoHi » 09 Jul 2006, 07:15

Im more dissapointed that they opted to use the same canopy on every frame rather than use a bubble with better rear visibility for the A and Cs.

-Aaron


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 23:17

by Dammerung » 09 Jul 2006, 08:56

I think it looks nice. And if a JSF is in close, that means the F-22s didn't do their job, so I can see why they chose that canopy.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 588
Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 05:28
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

by LordOfBunnies » 09 Jul 2006, 09:02

Have we forgotten that you can look THROUGH the plane. It's embedded with little camera and sensors all over so when the pilot turns his head, he sees outside of the plane. Canopy doesn't matter as much if you can look through your plane. Some of the F-35 guys have mentioned the existence of this system before and I'll defer to them.
Peace through superior firepower.
Back as a Student, it's a long story.


F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: 21 Oct 2005, 00:47

by Scorpion1alpha » 10 Jul 2006, 02:50

TenguNoHi wrote:Im more dissapointed that they opted to use the same canopy on every frame rather than use a bubble with better rear visibility for the A and Cs.

-Aaron


RCS considerations. And.....visibility is just fine, even without the HMD.
I'm watching...


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 863
Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 02:11

by asiatrails » 10 Jul 2006, 03:04

Looks cool. Here is a link to Flight magazine's comparison of the aircraft

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/20 ... pared.html


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 863
Joined: 30 Aug 2005, 02:11

by asiatrails » 10 Jul 2006, 03:06

boff180 wrote:That paints scheme to me is Fugly :s


Its the NASCAR / F1 look. One good high speed pass through a rainstorm will improve it. (maybe)


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 917
Joined: 29 Sep 2004, 04:24

by TenguNoHi » 10 Jul 2006, 03:50

RCS considerations. And.....visibility is just fine, even without the HMD.


See, I personally believe that visibility can never be "just fine". It can only get more perfect. Situational awareness is the precursor to victory in any kind of combat, whether it be air combat or other. A lot of people hear the term and think of things like Radars and Avionics almost immediatly. Has the Mk 1 Eyeball been forgotten? This is THE most reliable sensor or enemy position and activity there is, even if it is a bit short ranged. And we can't rely on one air frame to do their job so another air frame can do hers. F-22 is still not a proven fighter, and it is in limited and small quantities; and as a personal oppinion, even if I knew every air field within 200 miles of my target zone was cratered, I would still fly expecting an enemy fighter on my six at any moment. Additionally, enemy fighters aren't the only thing to be spotted visually, but SAM launches and strafing targets as well. Needless impeding obstacles are an aggrivation but I must say it's a step up from the F-117.

-Aaron


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 09 May 2006, 23:59

by RonO » 10 Jul 2006, 19:15

Not sure that color will be customer choice given the LO considerations.


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 29
Joined: 07 Apr 2006, 01:48
Location: Ft. Wayne

by danimal1504 » 10 Jul 2006, 19:18

anybody else think JSF is uglier than just about any other airplane theyve ever seen? i dont know, maybe im too old school or something...


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 588
Joined: 21 Jul 2005, 05:28
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

by LordOfBunnies » 10 Jul 2006, 20:04

Danimal, have you ever seen the X-32. It was the F-35's competitor, it is one of the most god awful ugly pieces of engineering ever to fly. Check the flying dumpster out.
Image
Peace through superior firepower.
Back as a Student, it's a long story.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 860
Joined: 08 Apr 2004, 22:51
Location: North Carolina, USA

by MKopack » 10 Jul 2006, 20:11

LordOfBunnies wrote:Danimal, have you ever seen the X-32. It was the F-35's competitor, it is one of the most god awful ugly pieces of engineering ever to fly. Check the flying dumpster out.


What? The yawning hippo...?

Mike
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 May 2006, 22:59

by idesof » 10 Jul 2006, 22:27

aggressor267 wrote:The bump on the right side is the gun.


Okay, am I the only one who is wondering what effect this horrendous fairing will have on the aircraft's RCS? :!: :?: :shock:


Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3279
Joined: 10 May 2004, 23:04

by parrothead » 10 Jul 2006, 22:31

Actually, part of the intake is removed in this photo as they had to yank parts off to make weight for the STOVL portion of the testing :wink: . What a FOXTROTTING MONSTROSITY :shock: !!!
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 May 2006, 22:59

by idesof » 10 Jul 2006, 22:41

parrothead wrote:Actually, part of the intake is removed in this photo as they had to yank parts off to make weight for the STOVL portion of the testing :wink: . What a FOXTROTTING MONSTROSITY :shock: !!!


Apparently, at one point this birdie was nicknamed "The Monica" (as in Lewinsky) :lol:


PreviousNext

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests