What’s the deal with the Arctic F-35 at Lockheed?
Note the lack of visible rudders, lack of visible access panels (at least in the bright areas where we could see them). It looks a bit like there may be a seam for the radome to come off, but the seam appears to angle forward (as if a hypothetical AESA was tilted downward instead of upward). There's no visible EOTS either, though that could have been taken off for various reasons. The nozzle also doesn't appear serrated.
All-in-all, I'm inclined to think that this is a mock-up vs RCS or aerodynamic test article, though I'm not sure why I haven't seen more of it if that were the case. As a side note; is that a TV-grade video camera on that cherry picker (with a person in a safety jacket and blue helmet) behind the jet?
All-in-all, I'm inclined to think that this is a mock-up vs RCS or aerodynamic test article, though I'm not sure why I haven't seen more of it if that were the case. As a side note; is that a TV-grade video camera on that cherry picker (with a person in a safety jacket and blue helmet) behind the jet?
- Active Member
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 04 Sep 2013, 07:20
- Location: Calgary
Dragon029 wrote:As a side note; is that a TV-grade video camera on that cherry picker (with a person in a safety jacket and blue helmet) behind the jet?
Yes, they're out there filming quite a bit. Often when test flights take off you'll see them cruise around to the runway side to film the take offs, breaks and landings. They have a very good PR department, and post some truly awesome videos and photos from time to time.
We finally have an answer from Lockheed as to the jet's origin, courtesy of David Cenciotti:
https://theaviationist.com/2019/01/21/t ... ort-worth/
https://theaviationist.com/2019/01/21/t ... ort-worth/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests