
ricnunes wrote:hb_pencil wrote:ricnunes wrote:So I cannot see how the F-35 won't get to compete.
Then you don't have a understanding of the basic issues involved in this process.
https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/086.nsf/eng/00006.html
LOL, in where does your link states that the F-35 won't get to compete![]()
If you can't figure out its relevance, then I don't know what to say. I've left enough bread crumbs here for you to figure it out, and I'm not going to spell it out any further.
I think enough people on here can attest to the fact that I have brought unique knowledge and perspective to this discussion for the past seven years. Insulting me isn't your smartest move.
ricnunes wrote:hb_pencil wrote:ricnunes wrote:But lets be realistic here:
- The only two real contenders/competitors are the F-35 and the Super Hornet.
We all know where Boeing and its Super Hornet is with the Canadian competition (with the Bombardier issue and all - which will only get worse with the planned Boeing/Embraer partnership) so that leaves the F-35 as the only potential winner, this IMO of course.
Not a relevant consideration to this procurement.
Really?? Since when being NORAD compliant, 5 Eye's compliant or resuming being compliant with US Forces (namely USAF) stopped being a requirement?? Care to post a source which implicitly says this?? (and not some odd site which doesn't say anything like the one you posted before)
Did I (or you in what I highlighted) refer to any of those factors? You talked about the "bombardier issue n'all", which is what I was referring to not being a factor.