Overview of F-35 test flights

Production milestones, roll-outs, test flights, service introduction and other milestones.
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 07 Mar 2010, 05:12

VarkVet wrote:Why couldn’t that sortie wait until Monday?


They probably have other flights scheduled for Monday ;)


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 185
Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 17:17

by Ztex » 07 Mar 2010, 05:22

VarkVet wrote:
LMAggie wrote:BF-1 back in the air today; flight 38.


Today is Saturday?

Sounds like a lot of people getting paid overtime with such a cost critical program? Well everybody but the active duty Navy chase crew!

Why couldn’t that sortie wait until Monday?

Tax Payer
:oops:


Wait...so everyone is freaking out that the program is behind schedule and therefore is costing a bunch extra...and then they work on Saturday, trying to do what they can to catch up and some one freaks out about that??

:roll: :roll:


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 07 Mar 2010, 05:40

Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 12 Aug 2007, 07:43

by LMAggie » 07 Mar 2010, 06:04

VarkVet wrote:
LMAggie wrote:BF-1 back in the air today; flight 38.


Today is Saturday?

Sounds like a lot of people getting paid overtime with such a cost critical program? Well everybody but the active duty Navy chase crew!

Why couldn’t that sortie wait until Monday?

Tax Payer
:oops:


JSF is working 24/7. That's how many factories/businesses work. And for the guy that screams for JSF to just get it done to complain about flying on Sat is just hilarious. I mean...wow...
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 07 Mar 2010, 17:52

When flights happen, after the fact, are hardly secret.

Just ask the of people who camp out outside the field watching for activity. Anyone with a pair of binoculars or a zoom lens could tell you the same thing.


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 62
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:41
Location: Sioux City, IA

by gosmack » 07 Mar 2010, 20:54

Agreed. It's one thing to give specific facts on the flights themselves. i.e. Flight XXX AF-1 was taken up to 48,000 feet at Mach .9 to explore the envelope of 9+ G flying qualities. We obviously don't want anyone to have specific classified data on aircraft performance or systems.

When each post relates to the length of the flight, who flew the jet, and a very basic description of what was accomplished isn't exactly classified data. There are plenty of people waiting at the fences of the airfield, watching/taking pictures/keeping track of the flight test program. If the test flights themselves were this secretive, then we wouldn't have youtube videos of BF-1 performing a STOL landing, or updates from Lockmart about flight test milestones, let alone interviews with test pilots.

As long as no classified data is being released, this isn't harmful. I think many would agree the F-35 needs as much good press as possible. Not saying there is anything wrong with it. The jet is amazing, but there are plenty of people who think otherwise.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 753
Joined: 13 Nov 2004, 19:43
Location: 76101

by fiskerwad » 08 Mar 2010, 13:32

VarkVet wrote:
LMAggie wrote:BF-1 back in the air today; flight 38.


Today is Saturday?

Sounds like a lot of people getting paid overtime with such a cost critical program? Well everybody but the active duty Navy chase crew!

Why couldn’t that sortie wait until Monday?

Tax Payer
:oops:


That would be true for the union guys, Vark, but the salaried guys I worked with were salary-exempt meaning exempt from OT pay. With LM's current policy of working at least 10% OT for free I'm sure the salaried guys wish they were part of the bargaining unit.
fisk


User avatar
F-16.net Webmaster
F-16.net Webmaster
 
Posts: 3783
Joined: 23 May 2003, 15:44

by Lieven » 11 Mar 2010, 10:31

Off topic OPSEC posts were moved to a <a href="f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-13724.html">separate thread</a> and so will future posts about OPSEC. If anyone has an issue with a particular post, just click the 'Report this post to a moderator' link and we'll take action if needed.

And as a gentle (and I'm sure also completely unnecessary) reminder to all people who are actually involved with the program <a href="f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-3389.html">Warning regarding classified information</a>.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 640
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 14:06
Location: Oslo, Norway

by energo » 11 Mar 2010, 16:29

BF-1 flight 38
Saturday March 6, a 0.7 hour flight with Jon Beesley as pilot. This was Beesleys first STOVL-mode flight and the second pilot to convert to STOVL-mode.

BF-1 flight 39
Monday March 8, 0.7 hour sortie.

BF-1 flight 40
Wednesday March 10. Graham Tomlison pilted a 1.4 hour flight. Accomplished were four takeoffs, three hot pit refuelings, flight at 40 knots and four slow landings down to 75 knots. It officially counts as one test flight as the engine was not shut down between landings. Full story and Video

BF-3 flight 9
Also on March 10 RAF Sqd. Ldr. Steve Long piloted BF-3 for a 1 hour flight.

BF-3 flight 10
Also March 10. Lt. Col Schenk flew a 1.2 hour sortie.

Source: Lockheed Martin



B. Bolsøy
Oslo


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 11 Mar 2010, 20:28

Sean Meade at Aviation Week ARES Blog has the video of the March 10 flight of BF-01.

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense :cheers:


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: 14 Nov 2008, 19:07

by loke » 30 Mar 2010, 14:39

I hope that there have been some test flights since 11 March!?

Has LM stopped announcing them?


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: 27 Apr 2007, 07:23

by Conan » 30 Mar 2010, 16:07

loke wrote:I hope that there have been some test flights since 11 March!?

Has LM stopped announcing them?


A pretty important one was made on the 18th of March that was publicised quite widely...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcC7Ps9cHsY

:D


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: 14 Nov 2008, 19:07

by loke » 31 Mar 2010, 08:27

Conan wrote:
loke wrote:I hope that there have been some test flights since 11 March!?

Has LM stopped announcing them?


A pretty important one was made on the 18th of March that was publicised quite widely...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcC7Ps9cHsY

:D

Ah, thanks, I did notice that one however I failed to notice the date.

My question should perhaps then be rephrased "I hope that there have been some test flights since 18 March".

Or have they stopped announcing all test flights, and announce only some of them, like the March 18 test flight?


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 61
Joined: 07 Sep 2006, 01:52

by Shaken » 07 Apr 2010, 20:19

I'm sure our buddy Energo will update the recent flights list near future, but I can at least point out his front page article on BF-04's April 7th first flight (the first mission systems-equipped F-35).

http://www.f-16.net/news_article4053.html


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 08 Apr 2010, 01:05

Here is a list of BF-4's Block 0.5 MS functionality.

Image
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


PreviousNext

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests