Next Gen Tiltrotor: Valor

Helicopters and tilt-rotor aircraft
User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

by count_to_10 » 18 Apr 2013, 23:45

http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ ... px?ID=1112

The engine pods are kind of interesting. They don't tilt with the rotors, and don't seem to have the IR signature reducers.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 22:52

by aaam » 27 Apr 2013, 02:40

count_to_10 wrote:http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1112

The engine pods are kind of interesting. They don't tilt with the rotors, and don't seem to have the IR signature reducers.


To tilt the engines or not to tilt has always been a close decision. On the V-22 they tilt in order to reduce weight, but it was a close call in the design phase. Earlier in the evolution of what became the V-280, the engines did in fact tilt.


User avatar
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 637
Joined: 29 Sep 2006, 03:07

by PhillyGuy » 27 Apr 2013, 05:10

Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 22:52

by aaam » 29 Apr 2013, 21:35

PhillyGuy wrote:Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


It's bigger than what they need for this role. Army was originally onboard for the program back in the day, but pulled out for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, USAF's objections to one of the main roles Army had planned for it. Further discussion would be more appropriate in other topic.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 518
Joined: 07 Jul 2009, 03:34
Location: Dubuque, IA

by bjr1028 » 08 May 2013, 06:09

PhillyGuy wrote:Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


Too big for utility, too small for heavy lift. Just right for the Marine Corps.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 22:52

by aaam » 08 May 2013, 20:49

bjr1028 wrote:
PhillyGuy wrote:Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


Too big for utility, too small for heavy lift. Just right for the Marine Corps.


Regarding heavy lift, interestingly the V-22 can lift a heavier payload than any helo in the West except the CH-47 and CH-53E. Of course, the Russian Mi-6, 10 and2 6 can lift more as well. It also holds the worlds speed record with an external load, demonstrating 10,000 lbs. at 220 knots.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1420
Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 22:15
Location: USA

by discofishing » 15 Jun 2013, 09:33

I'm make a new thread about the V-22 for US Army.


User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

by count_to_10 » 28 Jun 2013, 23:17

Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2652
Joined: 24 Nov 2012, 02:20
Location: USA

by KamenRiderBlade » 29 Jun 2013, 09:39

That seems more Halo level technology than what will really happen by 2050


User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

by count_to_10 » 29 Jun 2013, 15:07

I think the helicopter/tiltrotor/quadrotor parts are doable. Probably not the plasma cannons.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest