Forget Supersonic—Let’s Make a Sea-Skimming Cargo Jet
https://www.wired.com/2016/11/forget-su ... cargo-jet/
Would there be value in making a cargo jet like this?
Are there enough remote islands with inhabited populations that would find this type of aircraft useful?
Would there be value in making a cargo jet like this?
Are there enough remote islands with inhabited populations that would find this type of aircraft useful?
The Soviets built a few of these to use on their internal seas: ekranoplan. I don't think it ended up being particularly economical.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
count_to_10 wrote:The Soviets built a few of these to use on their internal seas: ekranoplan. I don't think it ended up being particularly economical.
The Caspian Sea Monster IIRC.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
KamenRiderBlade wrote:https://www.wired.com/2016/11/forget-supersonic-lets-make-sea-skimming-cargo-jet/
Would there be value in making a cargo jet like this?
Are there enough remote islands with inhabited populations that would find this type of aircraft useful?
If there was they'd already exist.
"There I was. . ."
sferrin wrote:KamenRiderBlade wrote:https://www.wired.com/2016/11/forget-supersonic-lets-make-sea-skimming-cargo-jet/
Would there be value in making a cargo jet like this?
Are there enough remote islands with inhabited populations that would find this type of aircraft useful?
If there was they'd already exist.
Well, they already exist, so, if they were useful, people would already be using them.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
- Banned
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: 23 Dec 2014, 09:25
It is extremely cheap to ship cargo by boats already, but it takes longer. But the trade-off in cost vs time seems to favor cost. Also it is much cheaper to build a regular runway for regular planes that can be used anywhere, than to design a specialized airplane for places that lack a runway.
count_to_10 wrote:sferrin wrote:KamenRiderBlade wrote:https://www.wired.com/2016/11/forget-supersonic-lets-make-sea-skimming-cargo-jet/
Would there be value in making a cargo jet like this?
Are there enough remote islands with inhabited populations that would find this type of aircraft useful?
If there was they'd already exist.
Well, they already exist, so, if they were useful, people would already be using them.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I meant. The technology has been there forever, but if nobody is using them there's probably a good reason. Like supersonic transports.
"There I was. . ."
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 8407
- Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
- Location: California
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
.....Spruce Goose??..The Hughes H-4 Hercules
- Attachments
-
- spruce goose.png (50.63 KiB) Viewed 13016 times
Maybe someone will set me straight here, but I find it hard to believe that flying in ground effect at sea level allows for enough reduction in drag over flying at altitude to make up for the slower speed.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
11 posts
|Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest