How effective are CIWS?
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 06:46
SpudmanWP wrote:Keep in mind that you cannot completely protect against EM if you use a datalink or comms to communicate.
That's true; apertures in general are weak points against HPM.
Even drones executing a swarming attack in autonomous mode would.presumably communicate amongst themselves to coordinate their movements. Presumably this is a potential weakness a HPM.weapo.n could exploit.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
madrat wrote:sferrin wrote:madrat wrote:Laser technology isn't exactly a 24/7/365 solution.
Those tiny drones won't likely fair well in poor weather either.
Not all poor weather affects drones and lasers equally.
Those "shotgun" rounds they currently have in 5" rounds wouldn't come close to cutting it. The odds of a pellet in the round hitting a small drone are simply too low.
https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovclou ... _Bland.pdf
You'd want something like a Goalkeeper with tungsten shot and even then it would be a $hit-show.
"There I was. . ."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests