T-45/ F/A-018 USN O2 Monitoring 2017

Military aircraft - Post cold war aircraft, including for example B-2, Gripen, F-18E/F Super Hornet, Rafale, and Typhoon.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

neptune

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2896
  • Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
  • Location: Houston

Unread post30 Sep 2017, 02:35

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... -u-441678/

Navy trainers resume flying with oxygen monitoring upgrades

30 September, 2017
BY: Leigh Giangreco

Washington DC
The US Navy has cleared the Boeing T-45 Goshawk fleet to resume regular flights after a five-month grounding caused by contamination concerns over the system that generates and supplies oxygen to the training jet's pilots. Student pilots can now resume training, but only on aircraft outfitted with a digital upgrade to the CRU-99 oxygen monitor, called the solid-state oxygen monitor (CRU-123), which provides information on temperature and oxygen pressure. All T-45 aircraft will have the CRU-123 installed by the end of the second quarter of 2018, a navy spokesman tells FlightGlobal. As of 15 September, the Navy modified 111 of 170 active aircraft with CRU-123s. After a June review revealed the T-45’s OBOGS does not have a water separator mechanism, which helps prevent contaminants releasing into the aircrew breathing air, the navy also decided to install the separators on the trainer aircraft. Out of the 197 T-45s in the Navy’s fleet, the service has installed a water separator on 146. None of the trainers are able to fly without the CRU-123 or water separator modifications, Joyner says. When testing began, the service tackled the contaminant issue first. But so far, test results have not shown contaminants at high enough levels to cause concern. Still, the navy is continuing sieve bed testing before closing out the issue. To better understand the water contamination phenomenon that sprung up on the T-45, the navy is exposing the sieve beds to extreme conditions, moist air and high temperatures. To date, the service has not been able to replicate the contaminant release problem, Joyner says.

Since August, the US Navy has counted four PEs on its T-45s. But in a perplexing twist, only one of the two pilots inside the same cockpit were affected, US Navy Capt. Sara Joyner, who is leading the physiological episodes action team, says this week. When the navy examined the incidents, the oxygen and pressure delivered appeared normal, she says. That’s pointing the cause of some physiological episodes toward variations in the human pilot, such as dehydration or a cold, rather than a technical issue with the aircraft. “Initially we thought we had a contamination issue,” she says. “It has become clear we’re sure we have a pressure issue, a work of breathing issue.” The CRU-123 has allowed the navy to understand that in certain flight regimes, air pressure delivered to the pilot through OBOGS was not sufficient, she says. With the CRU-123, there’s a way to test aircraft on deck and prevent them pilots from flying aircraft without sufficient pressure. Once airborne, pilots would receive positive indications inside the aircraft and be able to take appropriate measures to make sure they were receiving the proper oxygen, she says.

While the navy’s priority is to field the CRU-123 on the T-45, where the system is proven to work, the service is waiting to field the digital upgrade on the F/A-18 Super Hornet. Further operational testing is needed to assess CRU-123’s performance on F/A-18, after previous testing results failed to meet operational requirements, the navy tells FlightGlobal. The T-45 presents a simpler system than the F/A-18, which has also seen more pressurization fluctuations as opposed to breathing gas issues, Joyner says. The navy was also faced with a full weapon system suite and twin engines embedded in the F/A-18, creating a much more complex puzzle to solve. “It’s very easy to trace the component valves in that aircraft,” Joyner says of the T-45. “The environmental control system and the bleed air that comes off the single engine aircraft, much less of that air is being sent in different directions like it is with a complex Hornet.”
:)
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7717
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post06 Oct 2017, 01:17

http://www.wbir.com/news/local/portion- ... /481055987

Navy: Plane that crashed outfitted with new oxygen monitoring system

TELLICO PLAINS - The Navy training jet that crashed Sunday in Monroe County, killing two on board, had a recently installed monitor to help the pilots check oxygen pressure, a concern earlier this year by many in the military who fly the aircraft.

Responding to queries from 10News, Lt. Elizabeth Feaster said the T-45 that went down in the Cherokee National Forest featured what's called the CRU-123 oxygen monitoring system.

more...
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh

Return to Modern Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests