USAF estimates F-22 updates could cost $1.7 billion

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 31 Oct 2017, 18:34

The US Air Force estimates it would cost more than $1.7 billion over 11 years to upgrade 34 Lockheed Martin F-22s from a training configuration to a fully modernised, operational status, according to a USAF report sent to Congress.

The August report, recently obtained by FlightGlobal, outlines the estimated cost and schedule to bring 31 Block 20 Raptors supporting pilot training and another three Block 20 aircraft supporting flight test to the combat-coded Block 30/35 configuration.


$1.7 billion for 34 F-22s is $50 mil each.

More at the jump

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... on-442672/
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2346
Joined: 09 May 2012, 21:34

by neurotech » 01 Nov 2017, 00:53

The USAF also plans to introduce a helmet-mounted cueing system for weapons and a "billion dollar" sensor upgrade for the Block 30/35 fleet, the report says.

Also, they are upgrading more than the 34 jets .

There are ~100 jets in the Block 30/35 sub-fleet. HMCS hopefully.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 01 Nov 2017, 01:09

Makes sense. Just do it.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 01 Nov 2017, 03:37

neurotech wrote:Also, they are upgrading more than the 34 jets .

I am sure they are, just not as part of this $1.7 billion.

The tactical updates cost almost $8 million more per aircraft, bringing the price per aircraft to $50.5 million.


$1.7 billion / 34 F-22s = $50 mil.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 01 Nov 2017, 03:53

Includes a helmet-mounted cueing system, Finally.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 4K
Elite 4K
 
Posts: 4486
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 15:22

by wrightwing » 01 Nov 2017, 05:05

I'm curious to the sensor upgrade (i.e. IRST, DAS-lite, cheek arrays?)


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 8407
Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
Location: California

by SpudmanWP » 01 Nov 2017, 06:25

my guess is radar & ESM updates
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 01 Nov 2017, 06:34

11 years to modernize 34 jets. Hopefully the AF will be able to get more money up front and shorten the time frame.
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 9840
Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

by Corsair1963 » 01 Nov 2017, 06:36

SpudmanWP wrote:
The US Air Force estimates it would cost more than $1.7 billion over 11 years to upgrade 34 Lockheed Martin F-22s from a training configuration to a fully modernised, operational status, according to a USAF report sent to Congress.

The August report, recently obtained by FlightGlobal, outlines the estimated cost and schedule to bring 31 Block 20 Raptors supporting pilot training and another three Block 20 aircraft supporting flight test to the combat-coded Block 30/35 configuration.


$1.7 billion for 34 F-22s is $50 mil each.

More at the jump

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... on-442672/



If, these 34 early F-22's are dedicated to Training and Testing. Wouldn't it make far more sense to just buy 20+ new F-35A's instead??? (just saying)


Elite 4K
Elite 4K
 
Posts: 4486
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 15:22

by wrightwing » 01 Nov 2017, 07:16

SpudmanWP wrote:my guess is radar & ESM updates

I assume that radar and ESM will be upgraded anyhow. What piqued my curiosity was the phrase "new sensor," rather than new radar or new ESM. IR sensors would address the passive shortcomings vs other reduced signature targets. I know they'd mentioned upgrades to the AN/AAR-56, in the past. Adding open architecture, improved radar/ESM, HMD, IR sensors, and increased datalink compatibility, would go a long way to maintaining superiority.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5332
Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
Location: Parts Unknown

by mixelflick » 01 Nov 2017, 15:55

[/quote]


If, these 34 early F-22's are dedicated to Training and Testing. Wouldn't it make far more sense to just buy 20+ new F-35A's instead??? (just saying)[/quote]

I don't think so. The F-22/F-15 combo is the stated air superiority team. Nothing can duplicate a Raptor other than another Raptor. Plus those F-35's should be dedicated to their strengths: Air to ground with secondary self-protect capability. Maybe further down the line when more F-35's are in play and fewer F-15's are available..


Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2566
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

by charlielima223 » 03 Nov 2017, 00:09

wrightwing wrote:I assume that radar and ESM will be upgraded anyhow. What piqued my curiosity was the phrase "new sensor," rather than new radar or new ESM. IR sensors would address the passive shortcomings vs other reduced signature targets. I know they'd mentioned upgrades to the AN/AAR-56, in the past. Adding open architecture, improved radar/ESM, HMD, IR sensors, and increased datalink compatibility, would go a long way to maintaining superiority.


You think they're going to make the AN/AAR-56 more "DAS like"? Seems to me the hardware is there just not the software.


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 03 Nov 2017, 03:50

Corsair1963 wrote:
SpudmanWP wrote:
..If, these 34 early F-22's are dedicated to Training and Testing. Wouldn't it make far more sense to just buy 20+ new F-35A's instead??? (just saying)


....getting 30+ F-22As for the cost of 18ish F-35s seems to be a "Great!" investment; for "commonality" and a 15% increase in the fleet capacity.

....now that the "Lite" has somewhat proven?? the training simulator, the opportunity to upgrade the "early birds/ trainers" seems an obvious given.

....who knows??, maybe even a little "secret sauce" might be added???

....could/ would this be a trend for the "Lite"??
:wink:


User avatar
Banned
 
Posts: 344
Joined: 31 Aug 2017, 13:16

by mas » 27 Dec 2017, 04:13

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-bu ... eady-23771

The United States Air Force has awarded Lockheed Martin a new “indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract” worth roughly $7 billion to sustain the F-22 Raptor through December 31, 2027.

“This contract provides for comprehensive F-22 air vehicle sustainment,” reads a Defense Department contract award.


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
Location: Houston

by neptune » 27 Dec 2017, 04:40

mas wrote:http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/lockheed-martin-awarded-7-billion-contract-get-f-22-ready-23771

The United States Air Force has awarded Lockheed Martin a new “indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract” worth roughly $7 billion to sustain the F-22 Raptor through December 31, 2027.

“This contract provides for comprehensive F-22 air vehicle sustainment,” reads a Defense Department contract award.


Release No: CR-246-17
Dec. 21, 2017

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, has been awarded an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a total estimated value of $7,000,000,000 for F-22 sustainment. This contract provides for comprehensive F-22 air vehicle sustainment.

Work will be performed at;

- five operational bases Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida; Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia; and Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii; and at

- six support locations Edwards Air Force Base, California; Palmdale, California; Hill Air Force Base, Utah; Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas; and Warner Robins Air Force Base, Georgia,

- as well as at other potential stateside and overseas locations, combat deployment and enroute support bases, potential locations through depot partnering agreements, and system program office locations.

The contract has a five-year base ordering period with work expected to be completed by Dec. 31, 2027 (10yrs.). This award is the result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2018 operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,906,535 are being obligated at the time of award.

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, is the contracting activity (FA8205-18-D-0001).
:)


Next

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests