J-XX stealth fighter

Agreed, it will never be a fair fight but how would the F-16 match up against the ... ?
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

g3143

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 00:16
  • Location: New York

Unread post21 Jun 2010, 03:52

Does any one have any info or pic of the J-XX and do you thing F-35 can handle the Chinese fifth generation fighter.
Offline

discofishing

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1421
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 22:15
  • Location: USA

Unread post21 Jun 2010, 05:06

You might wanna check some other threads, I think this subject has been discussed at length.
Offline
User avatar

That_Engine_Guy

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2312
  • Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 05:03
  • Location: Under an engine somewhere.

Unread post21 Jun 2010, 05:12

I've got a paper shredder that would take the J-XX today.... :lmao: TEG
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
Offline

butters

Banned

  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 23:35
  • Location: nova scotia

Unread post21 Jun 2010, 16:31

The J-XX is truly the ultimate stealth machine. It can only be detected by an advanced, massively parallel computerized sensor system of global proportions, ie; the Internet...

The PRC spent over 20 years to develop the J-10, and that after the Israelis had already done half the work for them. Not to mention that their airforce recently rejected 16 of the Flanker copycat J-11Bs because of unacceptable build flaws.

Give'em another decade or two, mebbe...

JL
Offline

strykerxo

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 434
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 04:40

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 18:49

The wait is over the Chinese attempt at a 5th gen AC is here:

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... d=blogDest
You can't shot what you can't see - Unknown
Offline

Kryptid

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 343
  • Joined: 10 Aug 2008, 01:16

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 20:15

I'll wait until we get some high quality photographs or video footage before I'm convinced.
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
Offline

shingen

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 582
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2010, 03:27
  • Location: California

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 20:16

F-22 front end + S-37 rear + photoshop = Chinese internet fanboy nationalists feel like men for a few minutes
Offline

exec

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 11:39
  • Location: Poland

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 22:31

Nope, that's not photoshop...

It seems that American Internet fanboy nationalists think that the US is and always will be the only nation capable of building 5gen. :roll: :wink:
Offline
User avatar

FlightDreamz

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 792
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 17:18
  • Location: Long Island, New York

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 22:36

It's not that no one's capable exec it's just that there seems to be too much advertising hype and little substance to back it up. I think That Engine Guy and butters summed things up very well (as it stands right now anyway) so I'll get off my soapbox now.
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
Offline

strykerxo

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 434
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 04:40

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 23:37

Not video, but different view and clarity.
What is the Chinese version of TASS?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWLm23_eTlw

Beyond all the political and military implications, I love things that fly :crazypilot:
Offline

Pilotasso

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 532
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2006, 03:35

Unread post27 Dec 2010, 23:49

shingen wrote:F-22 front end + S-37 rear + photoshop = Chinese internet fanboy nationalists feel like men for a few minutes


Not S-37, the tail fins are different.

To me its remeniscent of the abandoned wing/pelican tail concept they were having for the original YF-32 prototype.
Offline

discofishing

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1421
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 22:15
  • Location: USA

Unread post28 Dec 2010, 00:59

and clarity.


Not really dude. The artist impressions were pretty clear, and cool. The photos did offer differing vantage points, but they weren't any clearer.

As things stand now (they could change - I'm not doubting China's ability to produce these kinds of jets) I'd recommend a NATO reporting name of "Fauxbat, Fauxback, Fauxfoot, Fauxstyle, or Fauxhand". From what I know of history, communist countries have fierce propaganda machines and aircraft with overstated capabilities. I am going to consider this aircraft "fiction" (another good reporting name, LOL!) until I get better information and more detailed pictures and video.
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7703
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post28 Dec 2010, 02:17

As if we didn't have enough of a challenge figuring out the PAK-FA, now the Chinese decide to jump in with their entry.. well, the more the merrier.
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 23315
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post28 Dec 2010, 02:24

DisFish gives new meaning to "FAUX ONE" and "FAUX TWO" (Fox 1 & Fox 2) :devil: :cheers: :twisted:
A4G Skyhawk: www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ & www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/videos?view_as=subscriber
Offline

Chandawg

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 06:46

Unread post28 Dec 2010, 03:17

^^funny^^
Next

Return to F-16 versus XYZ

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest