Makos drop 175's in ocean?

Discussions about F-16.net news articles. A topic is created automatically whenever someone posts a comment in the F-16 News section.
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 04:31

by VarkVet » 06 Jun 2010, 04:15

http://www.f-16.net/news_article4106.html

Anyone else flying 175 gallon tanks?

Nevertheless ... nothing compared to that BP disaster :twisted: :evil:
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 31 Jan 2004, 19:18
Location: SW Tenn.

by LinkF16SimDude » 06 Jun 2010, 07:20

I wasn't aware they had a 175 gallon tank option. GlobalSecurity lists just 370 and 600. :wtf: Or is this just another case of the Press getting it stunningly wrong? :roll:
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: 08 Jul 2004, 19:22
Location: Norway

by Boman » 06 Jun 2010, 12:34

LinkF16SimDude wrote: Or is this just another case of the Press getting it stunningly wrong? :roll:


Yes! :lol:
Best regards
Niels


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 04:31

by VarkVet » 06 Jun 2010, 15:35

I’m assuming 175 gallons x2 is the calculated fuel remaining in the 370’s when he punched them off.

If I’m not mistaken … 175 sounds like the center capacity of the 370?
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 165
Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 02:24

by Bodizzle » 06 Jun 2010, 18:08

VarkVet wrote:I’m assuming 175 gallons x2 is the calculated fuel remaining in the 370’s when he punched them off.

If I’m not mistaken … 175 sounds like the center capacity of the 370?


Since the story didn't say it happened during or shortly after take-off but on a training mission, more than likely the tanks were essentially empty. I was always told, don't know for sure, that an F-16 burns through most of the tanks with an AB take-off.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: 30 Oct 2006, 04:31

by VarkVet » 06 Jun 2010, 18:42

Lots of unknowns with this story.

Most of the Critical Action Procedures for the F-16 to jettison external stores are on takeoff.

If he was returning from a mission the 370’s would have been empty(maybe he got some Tanker action), and unless the engine wasn’t producing sufficient thrust to maintain level flight, maybe he/she shouldn’t have popped them off?

You have to admire the guys and gals flying single engine fighters!
:salute:
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 04 Jun 2005, 23:35
Location: OHIO

by jaws » 06 Jun 2010, 22:50

Never seen a 175 gallon tank in 18 years of working Vipers; guess the media or public affairs needs an education
"JAWS"


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 10 Nov 2009, 21:23
Location: Germany

by pitfu » 07 Jun 2010, 18:23

VarkVet wrote:Lots of unknowns with this story.

Most of the Critical Action Procedures for the F-16 to jettison external stores are on takeoff.

If he was returning from a mission the 370’s would have been empty(maybe he got some Tanker action), and unless the engine wasn’t producing sufficient thrust to maintain level flight, maybe he/she shouldn’t have popped them off?

You have to admire the guys and gals flying single engine fighters!
:salute:


Well, after takeoff, you have an oil system malfunction, amongst others. But I would imagine you wouldn't have to get too far into to the amongst others for this one.


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 226
Joined: 31 Dec 2007, 11:08

by vegasdave901 » 08 Jun 2010, 00:14

175, 176, whatever it takes! (quote from Michael Keaton in 'Mr. Mom')



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests