Dive Dive Dive
KamenRiderBlade wrote:XanderCrews wrote:KamenRiderBlade wrote:For those maintainers who have to screw in all those screws onto panels, are there not torque over limiting power screw drivers that can screw them in faster then by hand?
They don't want to strip out the screws.
and the military doesn't pay hourly.
My dad was in for 20 years, power tools aren't allowed. In the civilian world it's much more common
Ratcheting screw drives are the most common though. Remember the screws are made of aluminum, it's not hard to egg em out
I didn't know power tools aren't allowed.
Is there a reason as to why that is?
It depends on the type of screw used. In the picture it looks like a Torq screw, no power tool is allowed. I personally stripped a few and had to call the metal shop to come and get the screws out and replace them. Caused me embarrassment and humiliation to no end every time. If it is a Allen (hex) screw, then it may be allowed, if approved tools are available. We had small pneumatic power tools we could use, if in a well equipped hangar, on the Allen (hex) screws. Never any electrical tools though. I'm not sure if any of this have changed in recent years though. I don't know how I would manage around the house without my small DeWALT DCF610 these days. Panels opened often mostly had Allen screws, but all the ones on the wings, that I ever had to open, had Torq screws that stripped too easily to use the pneumatic screw driver, and we always use the one seen in the pictures above.
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
KamenRiderBlade wrote:For those maintainers who have to screw in all those screws onto panels, are there not torque over limiting power screw drivers that can screw them in faster then by hand?
Speaking only for USAF:
Back in the day, there were no "Spark Emitting" motor driven screwguns of any kind allowed to be used on or in the immediate vicinity of a fueled aircraft. Even flashlights had to be approved DOD originated and bring-it-from-home flashlights were not allowed. Sometimes the Airframe maintenance teams would bring out electric drills but there were always special procedures required with that step, including an extra standby guy with an additional halon rig.
Most DC motor drill/ratchet designs that you would pick up at the hardware store are very very sparky inside the vented case, due to the low cost of DC sprung-brush and copper commutator designs. It is possible to design a sparkless DC motor for this purpose, but they are not as common and more expensive than the over the counter screwguns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCEiOnuODac
Sometimes simple is better, you just have to pay attention not to over-torque.
Daddy why do we have to hide? Because we use VI son, and they use windows.
- Elite 2K
- Posts: 2024
- Joined: 20 Nov 2014, 03:34
- Location: australia
sferrin wrote:optimist wrote:KamenRiderBlade wrote:For those maintainers who have to screw in all those screws onto panels, are there not torque over limiting power screw drivers that can screw them in faster then by hand?
They are saving selling then till the MLU. At the moment they are quite happy selling the old stock of $5,000 speed handle wrenches
Do you have any factual evidence that those "wrenches" cost $5000 each?
They always cost 1,000 times more than a sidchrome
( It was a sarc, but I should have put a smiley up before, to show it)
Europe's fighters been decided. Not a Eurocanard, it's the F-35 (or insert derogatory term) Count the European countries with it.
archeman wrote:KamenRiderBlade wrote:For those maintainers who have to screw in all those screws onto panels, are there not torque over limiting power screw drivers that can screw them in faster then by hand?
Speaking only for USAF:
Back in the day, there were no "Spark Emitting" motor driven screwguns of any kind allowed to be used on or in the immediate vicinity of a fueled aircraft. Even flashlights had to be approved DOD originated and bring-it-from-home flashlights were not allowed. Sometimes the Airframe maintenance teams would bring out electric drills but there were always special procedures required with that step, including an extra standby guy with an additional halon rig.
Most DC motor drill/ratchet designs that you would pick up at the hardware store are very very sparky inside the vented case, due to the low cost of DC sprung-brush and copper commutator designs. It is possible to design a sparkless DC motor for this purpose, but they are not as common and more expensive than the over the counter screwguns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCEiOnuODac
Sometimes simple is better, you just have to pay attention not to over-torque.
Fear of sparks + flammable materials, that makes ALOT more sense
Especially given many power tools are low quality.
In addition to the reasons listed above...F-35 nutplates are glued in (no rivets). If you pop one you just lost 4 hours to cure time. Speedhandles make it much easier to apply the correct amount of force to pull the screw without popping the nutplate. This is a learning curve for our folks transitioning from legacy platforms. Back when I was a Viper guy I prided myself on being one of those guys that could get any screw without calling the metals folks for a drill. I was able to use brute force via speedhandle, impact, air impact, hammer and bit (my favorite , etc. You just can't do that stuff on the Lightning II. Also, The screw heads are pretty shallow and easy to strip if you aren't careful. The old hex head bits were great for drills because of depth, we don't have that luxury.
In the end this seems like a tremendous pain in the a$$ to every new F-35 maintainer (I was one of them a long time ago and felt the same pain). In time they learn the technique and are just as quick at pulling panels as they were in legacy. In my experience that little bit of extra care has gone a long way to preserving the screws for more panel pulls when compared to legacy (F-16 ventral panels come to mind).
In the end this seems like a tremendous pain in the a$$ to every new F-35 maintainer (I was one of them a long time ago and felt the same pain). In time they learn the technique and are just as quick at pulling panels as they were in legacy. In my experience that little bit of extra care has gone a long way to preserving the screws for more panel pulls when compared to legacy (F-16 ventral panels come to mind).
523 FS 97-00, 35 FS 00-01, 14 FS 02-04, USAFADS 04-08, F-35A/B DT 08-10, 58 AMU 10-14,
34 AMU 14-16, HAF A4 16-Present
34 AMU 14-16, HAF A4 16-Present
grab6303 wrote:In addition to the reasons listed above...F-35 nutplates are glued in (no rivets). If you pop one you just lost 4 hours to cure time.
Wait 'til you get to shave off the backside of a metal grommet because it protrudes too far. Four or five hundred times.
"There I was. . ."
- Active Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 30 Mar 2014, 03:32
sferrin wrote:grab6303 wrote:In addition to the reasons listed above...F-35 nutplates are glued in (no rivets). If you pop one you just lost 4 hours to cure time.
Wait 'til you get to shave off the backside of a metal grommet because it protrudes too far. Four or five hundred times.
I've been wondering how close they set the fasteners in the field...
When I saw A lot of the fasteners on AF-04 up close... wow. Granted, its at the end of its SDD life, but geewhiz. They were rough
- Forum Veteran
- Posts: 527
- Joined: 08 Dec 2016, 21:41
KamenRiderBlade wrote:I didn't know power tools aren't allowed.
Is there a reason as to why that is?
I've never seen a power tool on the maintenance line for this purpose. Granted, I only had 3 years in that stint as a commander of a phase company. But the screws are torque limited so you can't use power tools.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5332
- Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
- Location: Parts Unknown
spazsinbad wrote:NAVAIR : 24 Feb 2016 "Photo of the day: Cmdr. Tony "Brick" Wilson takes aircraft CF-05, an F-35C Lightning II carrier variant, into a 45-degree dive during an external GBU-12 weapons separation test Feb. 18. (U.S. Navy photo) https://www.facebook.com/NAVAIR/photos/ ... =3&theater & https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hp ... 3056_o.jpg
Damn. She looks downright sleek there...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests