SAR Mapping put to the test in Bomb Hit Assessment

Cockpit, radar, helmet-mounted display, and other avionics
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 25122
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post22 Dec 2020, 02:39

SAR Mapping put to the test in Bomb Hit Assessment
21 Dec 2020 1st Lt Savanah Bray, 53rd Wing

"NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. -- The 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron conducted at Synthetic Aperture Radar Map Bomb Hit Assessment on December 15, 2020. During this test, two F-15Es dropped live Joint Direct Attack Munitions, while other weapons systems including F-15Es, F-35s, F-16s, FA-18s, RQ-4, MQ-9, U-2 and joint partners used SAR Mapping technology to assess if the bombs hit and destroyed the intended targets.

“The objective of the test is to determine our ability and timeline to conduct real time strike assessment using synthetic aperture radar maps,” said Maj Derek Anderson, director of operations, 706th Fighter Squadron. “Synthetic aperture radar maps allow manned and unmanned platforms to image target areas from long ranges and through weather.”

This test was ultimately designed to find a new way to effectively close the kill chain – confirming destruction of the target. SAR Mapping technology isn’t new technology, but this test puts it to use in a way that can solve an issue for the warfighter in dynamic fights.

“Operating in Europe or the Pacific we can expect weather and the need to remain beyond the operating range of current electro-optical and infrared sensors due to threats,” said Anderson. “This test helped us develop platform and package level tactics, techniques and procedures that will inform operational and strategic level decisions.”

Though the test was managed and executed by the 53rd Wing, many of the participating operators were from the U.S. Air Force Reserve’s 926th Wing, showcasing a TFI effort. The test also integrated strategic intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets and US Navy fighter aircraft."

Photo: "Before and after of a bombed target." https://media.defense.gov/2020/Dec/21/2 ... 7-1000.JPG


Source: https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Dis ... ssessment/
Attachments
201215-F-XG347-1000 EDforum.jpg
A4G Skyhawk: www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ & www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/videos?view_as=subscriber
Offline
User avatar

steve2267

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2580
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2016, 17:36

Unread post22 Dec 2020, 04:49

I would expect a pair of JDAM's to do a wee bit more damage than that... :doh:

:devil: :mrgreen:
Take an F-16, stir in A-7, dollop of F-117, gob of F-22, dash of F/A-18, sprinkle with AV-8B, stir well + bake. Whaddya get? F-35.
Offline
User avatar

spazsinbad

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 25122
  • Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
  • Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • Warnings: -2

Unread post22 Dec 2020, 05:49

Inert much? Says 'live' in the text though. I guess one would need to know the target materials & construction strength.
A4G Skyhawk: www.faaaa.asn.au/spazsinbad-a4g/ & www.youtube.com/channel/UCwqC_s6gcCVvG7NOge3qfAQ/videos?view_as=subscriber
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3316
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post22 Dec 2020, 07:55

Sure looks like that thing got hit with a giant sledgehammer a couple of times... :D

Anyway, this is definitely good use for SAR mapping. With the resolution and long range imaging modern AESAs can give, hit/kill assessment becomes reality. No need for specialist platforms with dedicated sensors for that any more as almost any platform can carry suitable sensor(s) for that.

Return to F-35 Avionics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests