
spazsinbad wrote:Long ago 'QS' made the point (I paraphrase) that "the NON-SKID deck coating of whatever flavour is protecting itself." Perhaps one may argue a secondary effect is deck protection (from rust or whatever) but the NON-SKID needs to remain on the deck as long as possible so that the NON-SKID effects are retained. We have seen the old USN NON-SKID deteriorate rapidly on CVNs especially under the target wire and the landing area generally - that is WEAR and TEAR also. NOTHING protects the flight deck like strong appropriate metallurgy. This has been demonstrated time and again over the years.
Apart from the usual NON-SKID deck surface benefits for aircraft and machinery movements - here is anotherie:
"...Traversing Self-propelled; relies on frictional force between MANTIS unit [or ESHA-F-35B] and deck surface..." https://s2.q4cdn.com/767595508/files/do ... ochure.pdf OR download/file.php?id=31757 [ONLY MANTIS for Hairier page]