OK, then what's the PRETTIEST military aircraft (non-Viper)

Military aircraft - Post cold war aircraft, including for example B-2, Gripen, F-18E/F Super Hornet, Rafale, and Typhoon.
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 141
Joined: 03 Sep 2015, 07:54

by str » 03 Mar 2016, 16:54

Mirage G
g8.jpg
g8.jpg (32.35 KiB) Viewed 69642 times


Image

Image


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
Location: USA

by jetblast16 » 04 Mar 2016, 15:29

str nice!

I just saw this gem in the news today. Russia's new SR-10 trainer. She's a beaut in my opinion! I love it!

FmebdwsP3To.jpg
FmebdwsP3To.jpg (93.85 KiB) Viewed 69562 times
Have F110, Block 70, will travel


Banned
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

by charlielima223 » 04 Mar 2016, 22:21

jetblast16 wrote:str nice!

I just saw this gem in the news today. Russia's new SR-10 trainer. She's a beaut in my opinion! I love it!

FmebdwsP3To.jpg


forward swept wings... very interesting. I haven't seen that feature since the X-29 and the Berkut.


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1212
Joined: 02 Feb 2008, 20:43
Location: Macomb, Michigan

by edpop » 05 Mar 2016, 08:27

The CF-105 Avro Arrow from Canada back in the 50's and 60's was pretty sweet!
Attachments
Rollout01.jpg
Vietnam veteran (70th Combat Engineer Battalion)(AnKhe & Pleiku) 1967
Retired from Chrysler Engineering


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
Location: USA

by jetblast16 » 05 Mar 2016, 19:00

CF-105 Avro Arrow - AWESOME. I love those high speed interceptors from the 50s and 60s. I also really like the F-108.
Sick plane man. See below.

F108_3980103013_66f466318a_o.jpg
Have F110, Block 70, will travel


User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

by count_to_10 » 05 Mar 2016, 23:02

charlielima223 wrote:
jetblast16 wrote:str nice!

I just saw this gem in the news today. Russia's new SR-10 trainer. She's a beaut in my opinion! I love it!

FmebdwsP3To.jpg


forward swept wings... very interesting. I haven't seen that feature since the X-29 and the Berkut.

I thought that forward swept wings were intended to reduce induced drag in turns, but didn't work as well as expected. What's the point on a trainer?
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.


Banned
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

by charlielima223 » 06 Mar 2016, 01:26

count_to_10 wrote:I thought that forward swept wings were intended to reduce induced drag in turns, but didn't work as well as expected. What's the point on a trainer?


From my understanding the forward swept wing design was supposed to help keep airflow over control surfaces during high AoAs.

Image

It is also my understanding that forward swept wings actually produce "more drag" than conventional swept back designs. Forward swept wings would always have slower top speeds when compared to swept back wing. Northrop Grumman tried to get around this with the Switchback concept. You'll see that concept in fictional aircraft in video games and movies.

speaking of concept or experimental aircraft. This one is just too damn sexy in my eyes.

Image


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
Location: USA

by jetblast16 » 06 Mar 2016, 01:38

From Popular Mechanics:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/militar ... ard-wings/

'According to UPI, the manufacturer claims this gives the plane better stability at slower speeds and "enhanced takeoff and landing performance."'
Have F110, Block 70, will travel


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1289
Joined: 07 Oct 2007, 18:52

by Scorpion82 » 01 Apr 2016, 17:29

jetblast16 wrote:From Popular Mechanics:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/militar ... ard-wings/

'According to UPI, the manufacturer claims this gives the plane better stability at slower speeds and "enhanced takeoff and landing performance."'


Looks completely out of proportion to me, like an F/A-18 front fuselage being mated to something undefinable.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1682
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 02:00

by snypa777 » 04 Apr 2016, 17:04

Scorpion82 wrote:
jetblast16 wrote:From Popular Mechanics:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/militar ... ard-wings/

'According to UPI, the manufacturer claims this gives the plane better stability at slower speeds and "enhanced takeoff and landing performance."'


Looks completely out of proportion to me, like an F/A-18 front fuselage being mated to something undefinable.


Yeah it looks like a mish mash of a lot of everybody else`s ideas.
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1682
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 02:00

by snypa777 » 04 Apr 2016, 17:05

str wrote:Mirage G
g8.jpg


Image

Image


man that's a beauty.
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".


User avatar
Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
Location: USA

by jetblast16 » 07 Apr 2016, 15:26

If looks could kill... The Raptor looks like a UFO or something from certain angles. Wicked looking :twisted:

120427-F-KB808-174.JPG


120426-F-UI543-029.jpg
Have F110, Block 70, will travel


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 510
Joined: 04 May 2016, 13:37

by nutshell » 18 Aug 2016, 00:00

PAK for me hands down is the prettiest thing ever ^^


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 966
Joined: 15 Feb 2013, 16:05

by uclass » 05 Sep 2016, 16:26

I know it's a prop, but MiG-31 Firefox.

Image


User avatar
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 563
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 20:35

by durahawk » 06 Sep 2016, 15:45

For bombers, I'm hard pressed to find an airplane more elegant than the B-47:
Image
For fighters, I think the Dassault Rafale has some of the sexiest curves around:
Image


PreviousNext

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests