F-16 Aircraft Database
Airframe Details for F-16 #88-0433
F-16 Aircraft Profile
Aircraft:
88-0433
|
||
LM Aero T/V | 1C-35 | |
Plant | General Dynamics | |
Local C/N | ||
Delivered | ![]() F-16C Block 40B |
|
Current | ![]() F-16C Block 40B |
|
Status | [w/o] | |
|
⇦ Copy-paste this code to link this airframe from our forum
Aircraft History
Date | Status | Local S/N | Airforce/Unit | Version | Name | Info | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 Oct 1989 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
13 Oct 1989 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
01 Oct 1991 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
Dec 1994 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
Mar 1996 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
Apr 2001 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
Jun 2006 | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
Unknown | [act] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | ||||
04 May 2012 | [msh] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B | News Article | |||
|
||||||||
04 May 2012 | [w/o] | 88433 |
![]() |
F-16C Block 40B |
Crew Chief Comments
Create your own Crew Chief ProfileIf you crewed this jet and want to leave a comment, you can create your own profile in our Crew Chief Profiles section.
Abbreviations and symbols:
[act] | Active | [i/a] | Instructional Airframe | [sto] | Stored (e.g. at AMARG) |
[cld] | Cancelled Order | [msh] | Involved in Mishap | [w/o] | Write-off |
[con] | Converted | [o/o] | On Order | ||
[des] | Destroyed (drone) | [pre] | Preserved (museum, gateguard) | T/V | LM Aero Type/Version (Construction) number |
[emb] | Embargoed | [scr] | Scrapped | ![]() |
Photo Available |
Add your corrections at the bottom of this page or send them to us!
[Back to the F-16 Aircraft Database]
Air Combat Command investigators released an addendum to the report on the May 2012 crash of an F-16C from Hill AFB, Utah, at the Utah Test and Training Range. In its report issued last September, ACC's accident investigation board determined that a manufacturing flaw in a blade in the first stage fan of the aircraft's engine caused the crash and loss of the fighter during ground support training.
The AIB president reopened the investigation to re-examine whether maintenance crews should have identified the manufacturing inconsistency at the base of the blade, according to ACC's Feb. 7 release. The report addendum indicates that the blade's surface inconsistency could have been detected during installation at Tinker AFB, Okla., in April 2004, states the release. However, the ability to detect the defect was limited due to the lubrication applied during machining work and the transfer of the part, it states.
Procedures also did not require an inspection, and were not typically completed at Tinker for new blades arriving from the manufacturer, noted ACC.
Please use this form to add any list any error or omissions you find in the above text.
Note: your comments will be displayed immediately on this page. If you wish to send a private comment to the webmasters, please use the Contact Us link.