AF Chief Hints at Retiring the F-22

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

tbarlow

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 423
  • Joined: 05 Nov 2007, 00:35
  • Location: San Antonio, Tx

Unread post13 May 2021, 16:08

Air Force Chief Hints at Retiring the F-22 Raptor in Fighter Downsize

12 May 2021- Military.com | By Oriana Pawlyk

The U.S. Air Force wants to downsize from seven types of fighter jets or attack aircraft to a mix of four, including the A-10 Warthog close-air support aircraft, the service's top general said Wednesday.

Speaking during the annual McAleese conference, Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown said the service expects to determine the right mix of aircraft for the future through its "TacAir study." It will also assess how future fighter concepts will fit into the current mix of fourth- and fifth-generation fighters. But noticeably absent from his list were the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and F-15E Strike Eagle.

"My intent is to get down to about four," Brown said during a panel. "And really, a four plus one, because we're going to have the A-10 for a while ... [the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter], which will be the cornerstone, the F-15EX, and then we're going to have [the F-16 Fighting Falcon] for a while as well."

Brown said the fighter mix also will include the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, which defies the traditional categorization of a single platform, featuring a network potentially including an advanced fighter aircraft alongside sensors, weapons or drones in a growing and unpredictable threat environment.

Service leaders have hinted that while the F-15EX, a fourth-plus generation fighter, is meant to replace the legacy F-15C/D models, it also could replace the E Strike Eagle model in the future, given its weapons load. The F-15EX, known as the Eagle II, will someday incorporate "hypersonic weapons up to 22 feet long and weighing up to 7,000 pounds," according to Boeing Co., its manufacturer. The service first revealed it could replace the E with the EX "as an option" in a 2019 Justification and Approval request.

The F-22, meanwhile, has needed an increasing number of repairs and upgrades in recent years, including improvements to its low-observable stealth coating.

[...]

Full article: https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... nsize.html .
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7407
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42
  • Warnings: 1

Unread post13 May 2021, 17:26

Air dominance for Decade
Choose Crews
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5716
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post13 May 2021, 17:55

tbarlow wrote:https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/12/air-force-chief-hints-retiring-f-22-raptor-fighter-downsize.html

Air Force Chief Hints at Retiring the F-22 Raptor in Fighter Downsize

12 May 2021
Military.com | By Oriana Pawlyk
The U.S. Air Force wants to downsize from seven types of fighter jets or attack aircraft to a mix of four, including the A-10 Warthog close-air support aircraft, the service's top general said Wednesday.

Speaking during the annual McAleese conference, Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown said the service expects to determine the right mix of aircraft for the future through its "TacAir study." It will also assess how future fighter concepts will fit into the current mix of fourth- and fifth-generation fighters. But noticeably absent from his list were the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and F-15E Strike Eagle.

"My intent is to get down to about four," Brown said during a panel. "And really, a four plus one, because we're going to have the A-10 for a while ... [the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter], which will be the cornerstone, the F-15EX, and then we're going to have [the F-16 Fighting Falcon] for a while as well."

Brown said the fighter mix also will include the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, which defies the traditional categorization of a single platform, featuring a network potentially including an advanced fighter aircraft alongside sensors, weapons or drones in a growing and unpredictable threat environment.

Service leaders have hinted that while the F-15EX, a fourth-plus generation fighter, is meant to replace the legacy F-15C/D models, it also could replace the E Strike Eagle model in the future, given its weapons load. The F-15EX, known as the Eagle II, will someday incorporate "hypersonic weapons up to 22 feet long and weighing up to 7,000 pounds," according to Boeing Co., its manufacturer. The service first revealed it could replace the E with the EX "as an option" in a 2019 Justification and Approval request.

The F-22, meanwhile, has needed an increasing number of repairs and upgrades in recent years, including improvements to its low-observable stealth coating.

Earlier in the McAleese session, Lt. Gen. David S. Nahom, deputy chief of staff for plans and programs for the Air Force, said the F-22 is the dominant air superiority platform in the service's inventory. But he admitted there are shortfalls, especially in the maintenance of the aircraft.

"The crews that fly and the crews that maintain and fix it are just amazing people because that is a tough airplane to maintain, and move around," he said.

The stealthy F-35 has more durable low-observable technology because the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps each fly a variant of the aircraft designed for different scenarios, from landing on conventional runways on land, catching arresting cables on aircraft carriers, to hovering down on amphibious assault ships.

"We're going to have to go past that [to] where the threat is moving, where the technology is moving," Nahom said, referencing a fighter that offers more than the F-22 in air-to-air combat.

The F-35 fleet eclipsed the number of F-22s in 2019 -- with 203 at the end of that fiscal year; the Air Force capped its Raptor fleet at 187 in 2009 (it currently has 186). As noted by The Drive, one-third of the F-22 fleet is not combat-coded -- or operational for a wartime mission -- at any given time.

Earlier this month, Brown said the Air Force's F-35 fleet also officially surpassed the number of F-15 and A-10s, becoming the second-largest fighter jet fleet in its aircraft inventory.

Air Force spokeswoman Maj. Malinda Singleton told Military.com last week that the service has 283 F-35s, which exceeds the A-10 fleet by two aircraft. According to the Air Force Association's 2020 aircraft almanac, the service has 241 F-15C/D models and 218 Strike Eagles.

-- Oriana Pawlyk can be reached at oriana.pawlyk@military.com. Follow her on Twitter at @Oriana0214.


And I thought the Navy were the stupid ones. :doh:
"There I was. . ."
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7407
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42
  • Warnings: 1

Unread post13 May 2021, 21:25

sferrin wrote:
tbarlow wrote:https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/12/air-force-chief-hints-retiring-f-22-raptor-fighter-downsize.html

Air Force Chief Hints at Retiring the F-22 Raptor in Fighter Downsize

12 May 2021
Military.com | By Oriana Pawlyk
The U.S. Air Force wants to downsize from seven types of fighter jets or attack aircraft to a mix of four, including the A-10 Warthog close-air support aircraft, the service's top general said Wednesday.

Speaking during the annual McAleese conference, Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown said the service expects to determine the right mix of aircraft for the future through its "TacAir study." It will also assess how future fighter concepts will fit into the current mix of fourth- and fifth-generation fighters. But noticeably absent from his list were the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and F-15E Strike Eagle.

"My intent is to get down to about four," Brown said during a panel. "And really, a four plus one, because we're going to have the A-10 for a while ... [the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter], which will be the cornerstone, the F-15EX, and then we're going to have [the F-16 Fighting Falcon] for a while as well."

Brown said the fighter mix also will include the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, which defies the traditional categorization of a single platform, featuring a network potentially including an advanced fighter aircraft alongside sensors, weapons or drones in a growing and unpredictable threat environment.

Service leaders have hinted that while the F-15EX, a fourth-plus generation fighter, is meant to replace the legacy F-15C/D models, it also could replace the E Strike Eagle model in the future, given its weapons load. The F-15EX, known as the Eagle II, will someday incorporate "hypersonic weapons up to 22 feet long and weighing up to 7,000 pounds," according to Boeing Co., its manufacturer. The service first revealed it could replace the E with the EX "as an option" in a 2019 Justification and Approval request.

The F-22, meanwhile, has needed an increasing number of repairs and upgrades in recent years, including improvements to its low-observable stealth coating.

Earlier in the McAleese session, Lt. Gen. David S. Nahom, deputy chief of staff for plans and programs for the Air Force, said the F-22 is the dominant air superiority platform in the service's inventory. But he admitted there are shortfalls, especially in the maintenance of the aircraft.

"The crews that fly and the crews that maintain and fix it are just amazing people because that is a tough airplane to maintain, and move around," he said.

The stealthy F-35 has more durable low-observable technology because the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps each fly a variant of the aircraft designed for different scenarios, from landing on conventional runways on land, catching arresting cables on aircraft carriers, to hovering down on amphibious assault ships.

"We're going to have to go past that [to] where the threat is moving, where the technology is moving," Nahom said, referencing a fighter that offers more than the F-22 in air-to-air combat.

The F-35 fleet eclipsed the number of F-22s in 2019 -- with 203 at the end of that fiscal year; the Air Force capped its Raptor fleet at 187 in 2009 (it currently has 186). As noted by The Drive, one-third of the F-22 fleet is not combat-coded -- or operational for a wartime mission -- at any given time.

Earlier this month, Brown said the Air Force's F-35 fleet also officially surpassed the number of F-15 and A-10s, becoming the second-largest fighter jet fleet in its aircraft inventory.

Air Force spokeswoman Maj. Malinda Singleton told Military.com last week that the service has 283 F-35s, which exceeds the A-10 fleet by two aircraft. According to the Air Force Association's 2020 aircraft almanac, the service has 241 F-15C/D models and 218 Strike Eagles.

-- Oriana Pawlyk can be reached at oriana.pawlyk@military.com. Follow her on Twitter at @Oriana0214.


And I thought the Navy were the stupid ones. :doh:



I called it a month ago in the "F-15EX is useless" thread.
Choose Crews
Offline

madrat

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3106
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:12

Unread post13 May 2021, 21:33

It's the we will hold our greatest asset hostage to force Congress to give us more.
Offline

charlielima223

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1355
  • Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

Unread post14 May 2021, 02:17

They didn't get enough to properly retire the F-15A and C fleet. So now they're trying to tourniquet the on going issue by using the F-35 (though very capable was never meant as a next gen air superiority) and a brand new version of F-15EX

Image
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4542
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown

Unread post14 May 2021, 12:15

The entire F-22 buy should be used as a study in how to f#$% up the most capable fighter ever produced. In fact, I'd make a film out of it so future generations don't screw up as bad. From start to finish, they messed up at every turn. Industry handed them the most dominant air superiority platform in history - and they blew it.

I just heard the Chinese are building a statue of Robert Gates and good ole "CQ" here in Tiananmen Square
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 5716
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post14 May 2021, 14:27

^--- What he said. :-x
"There I was. . ."
Offline

zero-one

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2543
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2013, 16:19
  • Location: New Jersey

Unread post14 May 2021, 19:03

I wouldn't read too much into this. Remember when they also said thatbwithout the F-22, the F-35 will be irrelevant. Turns out that was taken out of context.

The USAF is throwing everything including the Kitchen sink to get more funds. They called it the F/A-22 at one point when it was being labled a single role aircraft. They used it as a bomber in Syria and called it a "trial by fire" when lets admit an A-7 could have done what it did back there.

They can't even retire the A-10 despite having a multuple aircraft that can fill its role.
Offline
User avatar

XanderCrews

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 7407
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42
  • Warnings: 1

Unread post14 May 2021, 21:05

zero-one wrote:I wouldn't read too much into this. Remember when they also said thatbwithout the F-22, the F-35 will be irrelevant. Turns out that was taken out of context.

The USAF is throwing everything including the Kitchen sink to get more funds. They called it the F/A-22 at one point when it was being labled a single role aircraft. They used it as a bomber in Syria and called it a "trial by fire" when lets admit an A-7 could have done what it did back there.



false

https://www.airforcemag.com/the-f-22s-u ... ver-syria/
Choose Crews
Offline

h-bomb

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 356
  • Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 20:07
  • Location: South Central USA

Unread post14 May 2021, 22:30

zero-one wrote: They can't even retire the A-10 despite having a multuple aircraft that can fill its role.


Exactly what aircraft do we have capable of the low speed - high maneuverability of the A-10? The prolonged loitering near troops to provide CAS, the SIGHT of the A-10 out weights the threat of being bombed.

Unlike the F-15/16/18/35 the A-10 cam efficiently flow low and slow to perform the "Sandy" mission that no supersonic aircraft will ever be able to perform. I would love to see a fully loaded F-15E(X) escorting a HH-60.
Offline

milosh

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1412
  • Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
  • Location: Serbia, Belgrade

Unread post15 May 2021, 11:11

charlielima223 wrote:They didn't get enough to properly retire the F-15A and C fleet. So now they're trying to tourniquet the on going issue by using the F-35 (though very capable was never meant as a next gen air superiority) and a brand new version of F-15EX


Maybe they plan to speed up NGAD? NGAD using same engine as F-35 and probable quite similar electronics (we can look at it as two engined F-35) would be lot easier on logistics then F-22 is so even though it would cost a lot to develop and buy on long run ~400 NGAD could even cost less to operate then ~200 old F-22.

So I retiring 200 F-22 and reducing F-35A for lets say 200 planes, while getting 400 NGAD doesn't sound bad at all.
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4542
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown

Unread post15 May 2021, 14:20

milosh wrote:
charlielima223 wrote:They didn't get enough to properly retire the F-15A and C fleet. So now they're trying to tourniquet the on going issue by using the F-35 (though very capable was never meant as a next gen air superiority) and a brand new version of F-15EX


Maybe they plan to speed up NGAD? NGAD using same engine as F-35 and probable quite similar electronics (we can look at it as two engined F-35) would be lot easier on logistics then F-22 is so even though it would cost a lot to develop and buy on long run ~400 NGAD could even cost less to operate then ~200 old F-22.

So I retiring 200 F-22 and reducing F-35A for lets say 200 planes, while getting 400 NGAD doesn't sound bad at all.


Logic would dictate they actually don't go through with this. Unfortunately, illogical behavior on the part of USAF/"leadership" is all too common. If they are floating this idea now, they must be awful confident in either 1.) The F-35 or 2.) NGAD. Given the recent quips about a "5th gen" minus aircraft, I'll assume #2 is the real reason.

This might also be the way the Israeli's get access to the F-22. That possibility IMO, can't be discounted...
Offline

madrat

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3106
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:12

Unread post15 May 2021, 15:25

I'd want a Tier 1 ally to have access to the leasing of F-22A at strategic strangle-points. Australia? The UK? Italy? Japan? Israel?

Keeping them operating in the hands of a close ally puts further pressure on strategic foes. The allies would likely find their dual-use nature to be quite handy.
Offline

alloycowboy

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 887
  • Joined: 26 Oct 2010, 08:28
  • Location: Canada

Unread post16 May 2021, 01:08

madrat wrote:I'd want a Tier 1 ally to have access to the leasing of F-22A at strategic strangle-points. Australia? The UK? Italy? Japan? Israel?

Keeping them operating in the hands of a close ally puts further pressure on strategic foes. The allies would likely find their dual-use nature to be quite handy.



@Madrat, why would American allies want the F-22 as opposed to the F-35. The only advantage the F-22 has is that it has a slighty faster supersonic dash speed and slighty better maneuverability. But for the most part the F-35's sensors, computers, and networking on the F-35 pretty much negate any really world advantage the F-22 offers.
Next

Return to General F-22A Raptor forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests