
mixelflick wrote:Here's the real bottom line why I think they're going Rafale: Spectra and Meteor (amidst other avionic goodies).
Well, first of all Rafale's Spectra isn't that superior to the Super Hornet's IDECM as some or even many may imagine. Even if Spectra is somehow "better" it would be only slightly so. Or more precisely, both Spectra and IDECM are in the same "league".
Regarding Meteor, the Super Hornet comes or can be equipped with the AIM-120D and there's even a new variant of this missile - the AIM-120D3 - being currently tested which has even better range than "baseline" AIM-120D which already has a very good or even excellent range.
Moreover, if the Indians really want the Meteor missile to be fitted on their new carrier-borne fighter aircraft and if they select the Super Hornet then I'm sure they would gladly pay for the integration of the Meteor on the Super Hornet and even more, I'm 99.9999% sure that the "Super Hornet + Meteor integration" would still be (much) cheaper than the "Rafale".
On top of this the Super Hornet (SH) also has some very important advantages over the Rafale. One of them was mentioned by milosh which is the SH's wingspan with the wings folded being smaller than the Rafale's wingspan and this is hugely important for a carrier aircraft since every inch of space in a carrier counts a lot!
Another very big/huge advantage of the SH would be Anti-Ship missions! The Super Hornet carries AGM-84 Harpoon missiles as its main anti-ship weapon while the Rafale carries the Exocet. The Harpoon seems to be a better missile having for example better range than the Exocet. And the Super Hornet will soon be equipped with the much better and superior LRASM missile. On top of this the SH carries four (4) of these missile (max) while the Rafale carries only three (3) of such missiles (max).
And I think that Anti-Ship missions may be a very important requirement for the Indian Navy and as such I think it was NO coincidence that during these latest sky-jump trials the Super Hornet carried AGM-84 Hapoon missiles attached to it.
mixelflick wrote:They've never bought an American fighter before, so its difficult for me to see them doing so.
Well, they never bough an American attack helicopter until very recently and now they have the AH-64 Apache.
They never bough an American Maritime Patrol aircraft until very recently and now they have the P-8 Poseidon (which replaced the Soviet/Russian Tu-142).
They never bough an American Strategic Military Transport aircraft until very recently and now they have the C-17.
So I think it's a matter of time that they will eventually get an American fighter aircraft as well.
mixelflick wrote:I guess we'll find out - some day, lol.
Yes, here we are in full agreement

“Active stealth” is what the ignorant nay sayers call ECM and pretend like it’s new.