UK MOD in a muddle over F-35C

Program progress, politics, orders, and speculation
User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: 12 Jun 2016, 17:36

by steve2267 » 09 Mar 2021, 20:10

milosh wrote:
steve2267 wrote:Like I wrote earlier. Give the Lightnings to the RAF flyboys, let the RN chaueffer the USMC around on the QE and POW. I'm sure the Jarheads would love a couple of party barges. :drool: Woe to the RN aviators though. Maybe offer them a transfer to the USMC. :doh:


And why for RAF want F-35B? I mean if they want F-35 it would be A.


Because the Brits have already bought Bees?

They have committed to buying up to forty-eight Bees. I suppose they could change their minds and split the buy of forty-eight between the Bees and Ayes. Let the RN keep the already delivered Bees so the RN piwotts have something to putter around the pattern in, and as spares for their USMC guests. Then let the RAF flyboys buzz their base in spiffy new Ayes, whilst they wait breathlessly (for 10-20 years) for their tempest teacups, which are then delivered without seats... (To save pounds, dontchya know.) Brilliant!
Take an F-16, stir in A-7, dollop of F-117, gob of F-22, dash of F/A-18, sprinkle with AV-8B, stir well + bake. Whaddya get? F-35.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 09 Mar 2021, 21:15

Yeah it gets silly pretty quickly but I LIKE THE ACCENT! :applause:


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 9825
Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14

by Corsair1963 » 10 Mar 2021, 03:26

milosh wrote:
steve2267 wrote:Like I wrote earlier. Give the Lightnings to the RAF flyboys, let the RN chaueffer the USMC around on the QE and POW. I'm sure the Jarheads would love a couple of party barges. :drool: Woe to the RN aviators though. Maybe offer them a transfer to the USMC. :doh:


And why for RAF want F-35B? I mean if they want F-35 it would be A.



They already have the F-35B....


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1078
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 16:07

by doge » 16 Mar 2021, 16:38

The-war-zone Loooooooooong article. 8)
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... th-forward
Top British F-35 Pilot On How His Fledgling Team Is Forging Its Own Path Forward
A senior F-35 commander explains the triumphs and tribulations of operating the UK's first stealth fighter.
BY JAMIE HUNTER MARCH 15, 2021
As British armed forces await the official outcome of the forthcoming government defense review and possible cuts to the UK’s F-35B procurement plans, the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy are jointly gearing up for a massive global deployment that will be spearheaded by the fledgling UK Lightning Force. Group Captain Jim Beck is the current Station Commander of RAF Marham, the home base of the British Lightning Force. He is a pilot who has flown the F-35 during some of its most exacting operational evaluations. Few people are better positioned to understand and explain the intricacies and challenges of growing a cadre of operators and aircraft to form a brand new stealth fighter force. Ahead of the high-profile deployment, Beck sat down with The War Zone to explain some of the critical issues in re-establishing Britain's carrier strike force.
The UK's F-35 Lightning Force will undertake its first sustained operational tasking this spring as it deploys aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth as part of Carrier Strike Group (CSG) for CSG21, a combined operation with the U.S. Marine Corps. A large UK/U.S. complement of F-35Bs will embark the Royal Navy’s new flagship aircraft carrier for an operational deployment that is likely to include periods in the Mediterranean and the Indo-Pacific region.
The CSG21 deployment is a major milestone in the British F-35 program. It is a manifestation of the deep UK/U.S. defense and security relationship, and it represents the rebirth of British carrier strike capability just over a decade after Joint Force Harrier was dramatically axed in 2010. Group Captain Beck has been at the center of the joint Royal Air Force/Royal Navy Lightning Force in recent years, having been the first commander of the UK F-35 Operational Evaluation Unit, No 17 Test and Evaluation Squadron, at Edwards Air Force Base in California. “This is going to be the most potent combat air platform of all time,” he told The War Zone in an exclusive interview.
The UK Lightning Force completed a huge “Groupex” deployment aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth in October 2020, which you can read all about here. It included the U.S. Marine Corps’ VMFA-211 “Wake Island Avengers,” the exact same unit that is planned to return to the U.K. in the spring for CSG21. The Marine unit worked alongside the first British frontline Lightning unit, “The Dambusters” of No 617 Squadron.
“When I walked through the squadron during Groupex, you couldn’t differentiate who was doing what,” says Group Captain Beck. “The two units were blended together with absolute lethality. In fact, the commanding officer of VMFA-211 said that his squadron was closer to 617 now than they are to any other squadron, due to Groupex. It was the exact same team that will deploy together for CSG21, and that was done by design. It could not have been more successful.”
The success of Groupex led to the Lightning Force declaring Initial Operating Capability for the F-35B in the maritime environment, on schedule, at the end of 2020. During Groupex, VMFA-211 and No 617 Squadron collectively deployed 15 jets aboard the British carrier and trained together in preparation for the larger Carrier Strike Group deployment this year.

Britain's F-35 plan evolves
The UK is the sole non-U.S. Tier 1 partner in the System Design and Development phase of the Lightning II program and its official program of record calls for a total of 138 F-35s. To date, the UK has taken delivery of 21 F-35Bs from Lockheed Martin at Fort Worth, Texas, with 18 aircraft now at Marham, and three attached to No 17 TES at Edwards.
According to Lockheed Martin, Britain’s participation in the F-35 program has resulted in significant economic value to the country. It advertises a headline figure for British industrial involvement that roughly equates to 15% by value of every F-35 produced worldwide, however this figure has been questioned and will be detailed in an independent economic impact assessment by KPMG International Limited. Some of this F-35 work is conducted by British-owned companies that are outside the UK, such as elements of the Rolls-Royce Lift-Fan system used in the F-35B, which are assembled in Indianapolis, Indiana.
To date, 48 F-35Bs have been funded by the British government. The aircraft are being procured under a “block buy” approach through the U.S.-led Joint Programme Office (JPO). The UK has actually ordered 35 aircraft so far, and procurement of the next 13 has commenced, according to a statement in 2020 by Jeremy Quin, Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. “These will be delivered through the “Block Buy 2” program [in production Lots 15-17].”
“The current agreed F-35B Lightning procurement profile will see the UK reach 48 aircraft in quarter four 2025,” Quin added in a written statement in November 2020. “This delivery schedule has been developed to support the F-35B Lightning Force generation build profile and Carrier Enabled Power Projection (CEPP) milestone requirements. In December 2023, when Full Operational Capability (FOC) carrier strike is scheduled to be declared, the Lightning Force will have a total of 37 aircraft which will support two frontline squadrons and the Operational Conversion Unit. The full complement, of 48 aircraft, will be available when the CEPP FOC milestone is reached in 2026.” This figure includes the three test aircraft at Edwards AFB.
It has become increasingly unclear, if not outright unlikely, whether the UK will purchase as many as 138 aircraft, although there is a wide consensus that more than 48 F-35Bs are required to properly equip the two new British aircraft carriers. Indeed, reports ahead of the Integrated Review suggest that the number could be capped at 48. Speaking to a British Parliamentary Defence Committee on December 8, 2020, Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Military Capability) Air Marshal Richard Knighton stated: “The 48 aircraft are those that we have ordered and [have] funding set aside for, and are due to be delivered over next five or six years. We know from our analysis that in order to sustain the F-35 capability and the carrier capability we do need to increase the number of F-35s that we buy. And that we will want to do that over the period beyond 2025 when this next batch is brought into service.”
Overall British F-35 procurement plans have butted up against the emerging Team Tempest Future Combat Air System (FCAS) and the preferred means by which to replace the RAF’s Eurofighter Typhoons after 2040. The full analysis of this complex requirement is being undertaken over the next few years, and is regarded as being too complicated and too early in the assessment phase to be included in the forthcoming Integrated Review due to be published by the Ministry of Defence.
“The precise number and the shape of that [F-35B] profile is to some extent dependent on our analysis around the overall Future Combat Aircraft System,” explained Knighton. “So, while we know we need to increase the number of F-35Bs to support the carrier right the way through to its out of service date, the precise number will depend a bit on the work we do and the investment we are making in the FCAS. So we expect to be able to make definite judgments around the total future fleet in the 2025 timeframe. It could be up to the 138, it could be less than that, but we need to do that analysis and that work.”
During a further hearing by the British Parliamentary Defence Committee on February 4, 2021, Air Marshal Knighton went further, stating: “Our expectation is that we will buy more F-35s in the second half of the next decade to improve the capacity.” This suggested the UK may not procure any more F-35s until after 2035! Lockheed Martin currently projects that F-35 production will continue until 2046.

Preparing a stealthy force
Despite having one of the world’s most advanced air arms, the F-35B marks the UK’s first foray into the world of operating a low-observable (stealthy) aircraft. Partnership with the U.S. has been critical, with personnel having been assigned to exchange postings flying American fighters well ahead of the commencement of domestic F-35 operations. Others have been assigned to U.S. Navy units as a measure designed to retain a core of corporate knowledge around maritime aviation operations.
Having an operational test squadron embedded as part of the joint U.S., Australian, and Dutch test team at Edwards AFB has also enabled Britain to stay at the leading edge of capability implementation. It has also been critical to the UK regarding bespoke capabilities and trials that have been required to enable effective integration with the two Queen Elizabeth class carriers — both of which are designed specifically with Lightning Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) operations in mind.
Getting to the point of deploying for CSG21 has taken a huge amount of effort. RAF and Royal Navy pilots and maintainers initially trained and grew the force alongside the USMC at Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina. Meanwhile, RAF Marham was being completely redeveloped as the UK F-35 hub, and it received its first jets from the training detachment at Beaufort on June 6, 2018, as No 617 Squadron “Dambusters” returned to Norfolk.
“No 617 Squadron is still quite a small unit,” says Jim Beck. “We are all about making sure we are a balanced, tuned, force, as we look ahead to Full Operating Capability, which is still a few years away. But these things take so long to grow correctly.”
Availability rates for the F-35 in U.S. service have been under intense scrutiny recently. The 2020 report by the Office of the Director Operational Test and Evaluation said: “'Low utilization rates continue to prevent the services from achieving their full programmed fly rates, which are the basis of flying hour projections and sustainment cost models. For the 12 months ending in September 2020, the average monthly utilization rate for the whole U.S. fleet was 19.6 flight hours per aircraft per month. For the F-35A, it was 20.6 flight hours; the F-35B was 14.6 flight hours; and the F-35C was 23.1 flight hours. This compares to service plans from 2013, which expected F-35A and F-35C units to execute 25 flight hours per aircraft per month and F-35B units to execute 20 flight hours per aircraft per month to achieve Service goals.”
Responding to a question about British F-35B availability rates, the RAF provided the following comment: “The United Kingdom’s Air Vehicle Availability is comparable to other F-35B users at a similar level of maturity, providing sufficient availability to meet our operational, training and force growth outputs.”
While numbers of pilots tend to be a yardstick to gauge squadron progress, Beck says that it’s the maintainers that are the fundamental factor when it comes to the F-35. “Manning is a challenge because it takes so long to train a full-up engineer [on the F-35]. The engineering evolutions we do on this jet are very different from other fighters. While it’s fifth-generation in terms of its warfighting capabilities, it’s a fundamentally different jet to maintain as well. We simply don't undertake routine maintenance in the same way we used to do it.”
“For example, with a car I know when it will need to go back to the dealer for an oil change, and I can predict when that’s going to happen based on my average mileage. It doesn’t work that way with the F-35. It will cough when it needs something. It adapts, it has smart analysis of its own biometrics.”
Beck says ongoing analysis of the required manning to support F-35s will “drive” how many aircraft are sent on CSG21. “The calculus isn’t the number of engineers [we send], it’s how we make sure we keep enough quality back at Marham to continue to grow the force while CSG21 is underway.”
“When an individual completes an engineering evolution on the jet, he or she will go to ALIS [Autonomic Logistics Information System] and manipulate what they’ve done — add the information and that then forms a data picture, which presents the health status of the jet. A small tweak in one area can generally make a big difference and improvement — from the low observable side to the engine or the undercarriage.” Beck says that it takes at least a year for a new maintainer to be sufficiently qualified and experienced.

Pilot training
No 207 Squadron was established in summer 2019 as the domestic training center for the F-35B in the UK, essentially assuming a mirror role that VMFAT-501 “Warlords” at Beaufort provides. So far, the squadron has graduated the new commander of No 617 Squadron CDR Mark Sparrow, and an Executive Officer, both on crossover courses from other types. In December 2020, the first two brand new students graduated from a full conversion course. “The full course takes around eight months,” explains Beck, adding that more courses are currently underway at Marham.
The use of synthetic training is central to the way the UK plans to tutor new aviators and maintain readiness. “On the Lightning Force we no longer use the word simulator,” explains Beck. “It’s fundamentally a mindset change for everybody and the word simulator is actually quite unhelpful, because it’s saying that you are merely trying to mimic the live environment. With this jet, we actually go to war in the synthetic environment and we actually then simulate the synthetic environment in the live environment. In my days on the Tornado, we used the simulator to train for our emergencies, because we couldn’t do it in the live environment. Today, you can take that to all levels of warfare across multi-domains. Synthetic training is becoming increasingly important and the Lightning is at the vanguard of those pushing that mindset.”
“We have to rely on the simulators because there are no two-seat F-35s. Every time a student pilot goes to live fly, or more importantly comes to some of the STOVL activity — which is considered to be the more demanding element of flying — fortunately, the Flight Management Software is the same in the actual aircraft and in the simulator. Our synthetic devices have the same software loads as the jet, particularly in the flight sciences domain. The first time I hovered the F-35B I commended our synthetic environment — it set me up perfectly.”
The UK purchased four full-motion simulators and four cockpits that are included in two Deployable Mission Rehearsal Trainers (DMRTs). Each DMRT is housed inside an ISO container, with two cockpits per container. The DMRTs feature the same cockpit layout and Flight Management System software as the full-motion simulator, but with slightly reduced visual acuity.
The UK is pushing towards a blend of live versus synthetic training that leans heavily towards time in the simulator. “There are certain things in the live environment that you can’t replicate. G-force, vibration, noise, the smell,” Beck says. “The jet does react differently in the live environment to how it does in the synthetic, we’ve just haven't modeled everything yet. A great example is how 6G affects the sensor systems. As society develops, the synthetics need to adapt.”
Notably, the Lightning Force has moved away from only using hourly targets as a means to measure proficiency, instead referring to pilots as being “safe to fly” and “proficient to operate.” Explaining how this works, Beck says: “There was a month when I was at Edwards where I didn’t actually fly the jet at all. But I’d “flown” the simulator 16 times. I had never been so proficient to operate. Safe to fly is more about the live environment, so we track both of these factors. We track how safe a pilot is, how many hours they have, and also look at warfighting competency — both in terms of live flying and synthetics.”

High-end training
Large exercises such as Red Flag at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, have underlined the impressive capabilities of the F-35 and how its pilots need to be stressed in training by suitably potent and numeric opposition. These large-force exercises appear to offer a fidelity of training that still cannot be attained in a simulator. “We have found that when there is a human-in-the-loop, machines struggle to punish people as much as we have found historically in the live environment,” Beck explains.
“A great example is Red Flag when you go up against professional aggressors. Those aggressors will punish any mistakes — they are probably the most capable adversaries we will ever go up against — which is why we go to Red Flag. We have found in the synthetic environment, when you add a human into the Red Air loop, the human dynamic moves everything up a level. It’s something we are really keen to pursue here — not just Red Air modeling, but also having humans in the loop.”
Beck says that the current air-to-air live flying that is conducted from home station is designed to “stretch the pilot on timeline,” essentially having an adversary that puts them under pressure. “In the live flying environment, we carefully orchestrate profiles which validate what we have explored in the synthetic. This isn’t simply free for all warfare — we are carefully exploiting each mission, like experimental test points in the air. If it’s a young student, we will expose them to the maximum number of training points in carefully-orchestrated presentations. Where we add the variation will most likely be in the synthetic environment, because we have to extract the maximum value for money.”
“Every presentation is valuable to us, because we have to be so far away from each other to do it. In the Tornado days the engagement ranges were such that you just had to lose sight of the opponent, then turn in and “pull the wings off the jet” — those days are long gone. The F-35 “sees” in its rear hemisphere for tens of miles! So to stress the jet and the pilot you’ve got to use virtually all of the UK’s airspace, so we’ve got to make these measured, calculated, presentations, and that's what we’re doing. It’s not a big, marauding Red Air in a Red Flag-type scenario — it’s actually a bit more scientific than that.”
“The vast majority of the work in this jet is Beyond Visual Range [BVR], but we have a BFM [Basic Fighter Maneuvers, close-range] ability, and we train for it. But with fifth-generation, that’s not the intent. We are so capable at such long ranges, and we will fight to our strengths.
The UK is at the front edge of pushing synthetics. We are a small force with limited resources and will cut our cloth accordingly. We truly understand the value of synthetics and are really comfortable exploring that environment and pushing it.”
Beck says the Lightning Force is working closely with the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) to adapt synthetic environments rapidly to reflect the contemporary world. “We need to be able to rapidly program what the theater looks like and train in it,” he says. “That’s what the future of synthetics looks like, accurate environmental modeling of what the world looks like in the information domain.”

CSG21 and beyond.
While the forthcoming carrier deployment is clearly a focus for the British F-35 team right now, Jim Beck is keen to underscore that the Lightning Force is not tied to the carrier. “We are as focused on joint operating bases as we are on operations from the ship. We are capable of doing both, or a hybrid. No 617 Squadron has already successfully deployed on operations from RAF Akrotiri [in Cyprus] and is now preparing for the CSG21 operational deployment. But with the assets we have available as this young force grows, it remains under careful management to ensure we hit our obligations to defense. This will continue to build towards full operational capability, with the further aircraft deliveries from our orders and the creation of a second frontline squadron.”
Official policy around the new British aircraft carriers was to be able to deploy one carrier at any given time, with an ambition to position 36 F-35Bs on a ship. The Ministry of Defence is yet to set an exact date on the establishment of 809 Naval Air Squadron, the UK’s second frontline F-35B unit, however, training enough manpower — particularly engineers — is clearly a critical factor in ensuring the Lightning Force is able to deploy sufficient numbers of aircraft aboard the carriers.
With just 18 F-35Bs currently delivered to RAF Marham, and with some undergoing deep modification work, Beck acknowledges that there are “preferential” aircraft to send to the carrier for CSG21. This clearly has an impact on how many British F-35s will join the forthcoming deployment. He also points out that the UK will operate a single standard of aircraft in terms of rolling upgrades, “no jet will be left behind at the moment,” he says, underlining how precious each individual asset is.
While much of the current attention within Ministry of Defence circles relates to the level of impact Tempest will have on the British F-35s — the UK will have to wait a long time before any more than the initial 48 jets are ordered and arrive on UK shores, with a stark reality that 48could very well be the total buy.
However, a prolonged procurement strategy shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. The carriers have a service life of 50 years and the F-35Bs are currently the only combat jet able to operate from them.
Infrastructure is also among the most critical factors facing the British Lightning Force right now, as indeed it is for the Marine Corps. “It’s not just about the jets,” Beck asserts. “We also need cyber engineers for example, with the bandwidth required for the access needed to mine and manage data, that’s as important as the jet itself! It’s got to be the whole package, and that’s exactly what we are trying to do.”
The CSG21 deployment is all about bringing that whole F-35B package together as part of an entire Carrier Strike Group, which includes critical support elements such as the new Crowsnest Airborne Early Warning and Control System, for what looks set to be an impressive deployment on a global scale.
The Royal Navy has recently signed a Maritime Security Arrangement with the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Forces (JMSDF) as part of a deepening relationship. Indeed, CSG21 is designed to enhance defense relations between the two nations, according to a recent Ministry of Defence news release.
Japan is looking to expand its Lightning concept of operations by using its planned new F-35Bs in a similar model to that of the UK, flying them from its two Izumo class helicopter carriers. This too could present a vital partnership for the UK as it seeks to enhance its ability to leverage partnerships with fellow international F-35B operators to maximize interoperability and operational effectiveness of Britain’s new F-35 air combat force.
All told, as the F-35 saga continues to unfold on an international stage, the UK's F-35B emerging force is working hard to control its own destiny, regardless of if it ends up getting anywhere near the airframes it was originally promised.


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1078
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 16:07

by doge » 16 Mar 2021, 16:42

No reduction was determined ? 8) (Procrastination to 2025.)
https://www.army-technology.com/feature ... r-defence/
What’s in the Integrated Review for defence?
Harry Lye 16 March 2021
Expanding the nuclear stockpile, strengthening forward basing, investing in the future Royal Navy fleet, research into ‘battle-winning’ technologies and a £9.3m refurb of the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms are just some of the UK’s plans to improve its defence and security footing.

Setting out the Integrated Review’s conclusions today, Prime Minister Boris Johnson will say: “I am profoundly optimistic about the UK’s place in the world and our ability to seize the opportunities ahead.
“The ingenuity of our citizens and the strength of our Union will combine with our international partnerships, modernised armed forces and a new green agenda, enabling us to look forward with confidence as we shape the world of the future.”
While the Integrated Review outlines the UK’s wider strategy, the exact implications for defence are due to be revealed next with the publication of the Defence Command Paper on 22 March.
In a section titled “Strengthening security and defence at home and overseas”, the Integrated Review reads: “The UK can only maximise the benefits of our openness if we are strong and secure at home – ensuring that our citizens are safe from harm while protecting our democracy, the economy and the critical national infrastructure on which daily life depends.
“Security is also essential to an international order in which open societies and economies like the UK can flourish and collaborate in pursuit of shared goals, free from coercion and interference.”

Spending plans
In spending terms, the Integrated Review largely rehashes previously-revealed plans to boost spending on defence research and development and modernise the armed forces.
Specific spending plans mentioned include £6.6bn of previously-announced R&D funding, commitment to a ‘next-generation of naval vessels’ including the future Type 32 Frigate – a possible mothership for uncrewed systems – and soon to be acquired Fleet Solid Support Ships.
The document also reaffirms plans for eight Type 26 frigates and five Type 31 frigates.
Ahead of the Integrated Review, reports suggested the UK could see a significant reduction in its previously stated aim to acquire 138 F-35B fighter jets, however, the Integrated Review does keep the door open for more fighters, saying the UK will have ‘at least 48 F-35s by 2025.
Spending commitments also include plans to continue the development of the Tempest Future Combat Air System (FCAS) and deliver upgraded radars for the UK’s existing fleet of Typhoon jets.
The UK is also set to embark on £9.3m plans to support the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms – commonly known as COBRA – and establish a new situation centre able to pull in ‘live data, analysis and insights’ so government decision-makers can better understand and respond to potential crises.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -u-k-warns
U.K. to Expand Nuclear Arsenal in Biggest Shift Since Cold War
By Kitty Donaldson and Charlotte Ryan March 16, 2021
The U.K. plans to bolster its stockpile of nuclear weapons to counter growing threats around the world, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced as he unveiled a radical overhaul of defense and foreign policy.
Under a blueprint for the next decade, the U.K. will cut troop numbers, tanks and some fighter jets, according to a person familiar with the matter, while bolstering its arsenal of nuclear missiles potentially by more than 40%.
The first stage of the plans is contained in a 100-page report which Johnson’s officials are billing as the most wide ranging re-evaluation of the U.K.’s security and place in the world since the end of the Cold War.
In it, the government warns the country is under threat from rogue states, terrorists and even big tech companies, arguing that British military capabilities and international strategies must be reshaped in response.
The decision to bolster the U.K.’s nuclear capability calls time on the gradual disarmament that marked the end of the Cold War amid an assessment other countries are “increasing and diversifying their nuclear arsenals” involving “novel nuclear technologies,” the report said.
“We remain committed to maintaining the minimum destructive power needed to guarantee that the U.K.’s nuclear deterrent remains credible and effective against the full range of state nuclear threats from any direction,” the document said.
KEY POINTS IN JOHNSON’S DEFENSE PLAN
    ・The maximum limit to the number of nuclear warheads the U.K. maintains will rise to 260 from 180
    ・Military bases will be revamped in Kenya, Oman, Singapore, Cyprus, Gibraltar and Germany so forces can respond more quickly - with a focus on the Indo-Pacific region
    Plans to develop the next generation of naval vessels, including Type 32 frigates, and to build warships in Scotland will go ahead while at least 48 Lockheed Martin F-35 combat aircraft will be added by 2025.
    ・Work on developing the Future Combat Air System for the RAF and delivering upgraded Typhoon radars will also continue
    ・According to a person familiar with the matter, ministers will next week set out plans to cut the British army by 10,000 personnel, alongside a reduction of 77 tanks and 760 Lockheed Martin Warrior fighting vehicles
    ・The Royal Air Force will see a reduction of 24 Eurofighter Typhoon jets, 13 Lockheed Hercules transport planes and Queen Elizabeth II’s four remaining VIP jets, the person said
    ・The Navy will lose two specialist submarine-hunting frigates well as 13 minehunters which are due to be replaced by drones, the person said
As the U.K. moves to a higher dependence on technology, traditional capability will be cut back or phased out. A plan for defense capability, including reductions to troop numbers, is set to be announced next week, according to a person familiar with the plans.
The document warns that the world is facing a risk of terrorism involving unconventional weapons, too.
“The main sources of terrorist threat are from Islamist and Northern Ireland-related terrorism and far-right, far-left, anarchist and single-issue terrorism,” the report says. “It is likely that a terrorist group will launch a successful CBRN attack by 2030.” CBRN is an abbreviation for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear.
Even so, the former head of Britain’s overseas intelligence agency MI6, Alex Younger, said the threat of a so-called dirty bomb isn’t imminent. “I’m not aware of any information that has it as an imminent issue but clearly it has got to stay factored in,” he told BBC radio Tuesday.
The policy framework spans overseas aid, cyber warfare, the future of the armed forces, and addressing climate change. For Johnson, it’s a chance to tell the world how he sees post-Brexit Britain’s role in the global order developing over the next decade.

Activist Britain
In the report, Johnson outlined a new activist approach to international relations on issues such as climate change and democracy as he makes clear he regards the Indo-Pacific as increasingly the geopolitical center of the world, especially with the growing clout of China.
Johnson intends to visit India at the end of April on his first trip overseas since Britain left the European Union trade and market regime as part of a plan to deepen defense, diplomatic and trade relations with India, Japan, South Korea and Australia.
“We must be willing to change our approach and adapt to the new world emerging around us,” Johnson said in the foreword to the so-called integrated review. “Open and democratic societies like the U.K. must demonstrate they are match-fit for a more competitive world.”
The report said China’s increasing power and international assertiveness are likely to be “the most significant geopolitical factor” of the next decade.
“Open, trading economies like the U.K. will need to engage with China and remain open to Chinese trade and investment, but they must also protect themselves against practices that have an adverse effect on prosperity and security,” it said.

China Battles
Johnson’s approach to China risks a further battle with his own Conservative Party colleagues, who have taken an increasingly hawkish line on dealing with the nation. By describing China as a “systemic threat” while denouncing Russia under Vladimir Putin as an “active threat,” Johnson’s report risks angering some Tories.
Describing Saudi Arabia as a “close ally” is also likely to dismay those who have called for the end to unrestricted arms sales after the U.S. said Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder of columnist Jamal Khashoggi.
The report also contains a commitment to restore foreign aid spending to 0.7% of national income “when the fiscal situation allows” after Johnson’s own Conservative Party colleagues threatened to take him to court to block the reduction in foreign aid spending.
The review says British troops will serve overseas “more often and for longer” in the “new frontiers” of space and cyber-warfare and assist other nations in countering “non-state challenges,” including those from terrorists.
— With assistance by Giles Turner, Caroline Hepker, and Thomas Seal


------[Edit]------
I found the GOV.UK official pdf, but only this one sentence is written about F-35. :doh:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ign-policy
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... Policy.pdf
•Progress our Carrier Strike capabilities, with at least 48 F-35s by 2025.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 16 Mar 2021, 20:59

IF interested in QE munitions handling: https://www.navylookout.com/hms-queen-e ... munitions/

HMS Queen Elizabeth arrives on the Clyde to embark munitions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xM8sxoFcyo



User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7505
Joined: 16 Oct 2012, 19:42

by XanderCrews » 16 Mar 2021, 21:06

Would seem that the need for a Navy is more needed now than ever.

No surprise at the nuclear news. Nukes are relatively cheap. lots of militaries lean on them, rather than large field forces
Choose Crews


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 149
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 15:55

by Tiger05 » 22 Mar 2021, 19:27

Defence review was released today. F-35B procurement wont be capped at 48 and the UK will in fact order additional examples.

The report also commits to “grow the [F-35B] Lightning II force, increasing the fleet size beyond the 48 aircraft that we have already ordered”. No further detail about this plan has been released, but it is expected to cover the acquisition of additional examples within the coming years to ensure that this number of aircraft – required to ensure continuation of the UK’s Carrier Strike capability with the Royal Navy’s two Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers for the next several decades – is safeguarded.

A decision on potentially reducing the UK’s programme of record requirement to eventually acquire 138 F-35s appears to have been deferred until the time of its next strategic defence review in 2025.


https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/ty ... 90.article


User avatar
Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: 12 Jun 2016, 17:36

by steve2267 » 22 Mar 2021, 20:40

How many Bees does the Queen needz, to keep her carriers buzeez?

Let's pick a number: 68. Then she could buy 70 Ayes at a cost savings of 10-20M pounds each for the Arr Aye Eph.
Take an F-16, stir in A-7, dollop of F-117, gob of F-22, dash of F/A-18, sprinkle with AV-8B, stir well + bake. Whaddya get? F-35.


Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3150
Joined: 02 Feb 2014, 15:43

by basher54321 » 22 Mar 2021, 23:55



User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 23 Mar 2021, 01:12

Defence in a competitive age
Mar 2021 MoD UK

"...Carrier Strike Group
The arrival of Britain’s fifth generation Carrier Strike Group (CSG) marks a step change in capability. A symbol of Global Britain in action, both of our Carriers (HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH and HMS PRINCE OF WALES) were assembled in Scotland from sections built across the Union. The CSG provides a platform to deliver the Government’s defence, foreign policy and trade priorities and to project the UK’s global reach and influence. The ability to deploy a sovereign CSG underlines the UK’s global ambition and leadership as an inclusive, outward facing and free trading nation, assertive in defending our values and interests, and a champion of international rules.

The CSG comprises cutting-edge frigates, destroyers, a nuclear powered submarine, support ships, and a carrier air wing of Royal Air Force and Royal Navy F-35B jets and helicopters. International and interchangeable by design, the CSG offers unique strategic flexibility, from countering state threats and non state threats, through to humanitarian and disaster relief. A UK CSG will be permanently available to NATO, an embodiment of our unwavering commitment to the defence and deterrence of the Euro Atlantic area. The strategic utility of the CSG will be demonstrated by its inaugural deployment in 2021 to the Indo Pacific region. Integrated with United States Navy and United States Marine Corps it will showcase the UK’s ability to project global influence and send a powerful message about our ability, and our willingness, to act globally.... [page 14]

...7.41. The Royal Air Force will continue to grow its Combat Air capacity over the next few years as we fully establish all seven operational Typhoon Squadrons and grow the Lightning II Force, increasing the fleet size beyond the 48 aircraft that we have already ordered. Together they will provide a formidable capability, which will be continually upgraded to meet the threat, exploit multi domain integration and expand utility. The Royal Air Force will spiral develop Typhoon capability, integrate new weapons such as the UK developed ‘SPEAR Cap 3’ precision air launched weapon and invest in the Radar 2 programme to give it a powerful electronically scanned array radar. We will integrate more UK weapons onto Lightning II and invest to ensure that its software and capability are updated alongside the rest of the global F-35 fleet...." [page 61]

Source: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... ve_age.pdf (10.1Mb)
Attachments
UKcsg2021.jpg


Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 264
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 14:16

by noth » 25 Mar 2021, 00:02

Just in time for the first operational deployment, the Crowsnest system is declared ready (with pre-IOC sets):

Just in time for the operational Carrier Strike deployment in May, the first Merlin Mk2 aircraft equipped with a Crowsnest kit has gone into service with the RN.


The Crowsnest project has not gone smoothly and there was some doubt as to whether any aircraft would be ready by May. The first radar flight trial was made in February 2020 and under growing pressure, the contractors, Lockheed Martin, Leonardo and Thales, allocated extra resources to the project. The three Crowsnest Merlins that will accompany the CSG21 deployment will carry pre-IOC sets which are not fully certified, although this should give at least basic capability – any limitations are obviously classified. Full IOC is scheduled for September 2021, with FOC in May 2023.

Each helicopter has a crew of three, two observers who are the mission and tactical specialists and one pilot. When at altitude, they extend the radar horizon to give early warning of air or surface threats. The operators are nicknamed ‘baggers’ and provide airborne surveillance and control (ASaC) for other aircraft in the carrier’s strike group, including the F-35s.

The distinctive-looking ‘bag’ containing the radar is attached by an arm to the fuselage and after take-off, is lowered to the vertical position. When not in use the radome is is lifted 90º to the horizontal position and the bag deflated.


https://www.navylookout.com/first-crows ... oyal-navy/


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1078
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 16:07

by doge » 02 Apr 2021, 08:38

Absolutely. :shock:
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2 ... ys/173055/
UK ‘Absolutely’ Will Buy More F-35s, Procurement Minister Says
But Jeremy Quin declined to say whether the 138-jet goal remains unchanged.
By Marcus Weisgerber March 31, 2021
The United Kingdom plans to order more F-35 Joint Strike Fighters by 2025, a top Defence Ministry official said.
Jeremy Quin, the minister for defense procurement, said the UK would be adding to the 48 jets it has already purchased from Lockheed Martin.
“By 2025, we will be placing orders—I’m absolutely confident—for more of them,” Quin said during an interview Tuesday.
But Quin declined to say whether Britain’s original plan to buy a total of 138 jets remains unchanged. The Defense Ministry’s new defense strategy is similarly mum on the question.
The U.S. Air Force is considering trimming its own purchases of the F-35A variant; its current 1,763-jet plan was laid out in 1997. Top service leaders have recently declared the F-35A the cornerstone of its future combat fleet, but some generals are calling for earlier-than-planned development of a new generation of warplanes.

“I’ve seen the debate going on in the States. We think [the] F-35 is great,” Quin said. “We want more of them, but we’re also aware of getting that right balance between fighters and drones, etc. so of course we’ll be keeping under review exactly what the right numbers are, but it will definitely be more F-35s on order for use by the Royal Navy and RAF.”
The United Kingdom’s projected fleet of 138 jets is the third-largest of any nation, behind only Japan’s 147 aircraft and the United States’ tri-service fleet of more than 2,400.
The U.K. is using the F-35B—the short-takeoff and vertical landing version of the jet flown by the U.S. Marine Corps—to fly from its two new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers. The HMS Queen Elizabeth is scheduled to deploy to the Indo-Pacific region later this year with a U.S. Marine Corps F-35 squadron.
“The more we as allies can know that there is interoperability to support each other in the worst kind of scenarios, the more secure we should all feel,” Quin said.
Meanwhile, the U.K. military’s top procurement official touted work on the Tempest Future Combat Air System, a new-generation warplane under development.
“I think we all have similar mindsets that the future of combat air is going to be very, very different and we all need to be putting proper investment into it,” Quin said. “Look, over a period of time, potential adversaries have upped their game in terms of air combat.”

Quin was referencing advanced combat jets being developed by China and Russia.
The new U.K. defense strategy calls for boosting Tempest funding by nearly $3 billion. U.K. companies are also making their own investment in technology being considered for the new-generation warplanes, Quin said.
“This won’t just be a plane, it is a system,” he said. “We are very open minded as to how that develops — and the wingman flying alongside it — to make certain we have the technology that we’ll be able to deliver a punch in the future.”
BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Leonardo and MBDA are among the “Team Tempest” companies working on the new warplane, which is envisioned to replace the Royal Air Force’s Eurofighter Typhoons beginning in the mid-2030s.
Quin said there “has to be” opportunity for collaboration on these next-generation systems.
“I think all of us are at early stages on these programs, but interoperability is … invaluable,” Quin said. “Will there be opportunities, I’m sure these things will develop. I’m sure opportunities will emerge. But it’s no bad thing to have us all working hard to ensure that we are harnessing the potential of these technologies and to make certain we are covering all bases.”


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 10 Apr 2021, 09:46

IN the LONG 'drive' article above are DRMTs - here is the pic: viewtopic.php?f=58&t=15969&p=451484&hilit=dmrt#p451484
"Deployable Mission Rehearsal Trainers (DMRT) allow up to 4 pilots to conduct emergency procedure training and mission rehearsals." https://twitter.com/NavyLookout/status/ ... 56/photo/1
Attachments
QEdmrtPDF.jpg


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 10 Apr 2021, 10:02

F-35 DMRT Deployable Mission Rehearsal Trainer in a Container https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7eBfo4NwdA



PreviousNext

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests