Initial Version of Missile-SIM for Performance evaluation

Thanks for your great work litzj.

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html

I conducted sensitivity analysis for the hardware specification of the four missiles

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... art-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/05/aim-120c-study-using-missile-sim-part-3.html​​​​

Before I expand my simulation, there is few additional result for AIM-120 related stuff

Spurt made a similar missile sim, i figured his result can be useful to you
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1200
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=25735&start=1110

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/0 ... or_14.html

I have tested generic ATACMS model and its air-launched version

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... ocket.html

effectiveness of AASM type weapon is analyzed

Nice work

I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

That is some really impressive stuff. Hats off to your modeling!

I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?

I have simulated flying trajectory of Kh-47 or Iskander-M
(w/ lot of assumed model)

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/11 ... n-for.html

probably, it is the last article related to Missile-SIM (I will develop new code for aicraft)

Isn't Kh-47 range supposed to be 3000 Km ?

As you could see in the result, range can be extended depending on glide angle of it.

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... daski.html

Russian version of CUDAski is possible.

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02 ... n-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2020/02/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for.html

Impact of missile size on kinematic range

A large missile should have a higher sectional density. (More mass behind each square inch of frontal area, assuming it's not a short, fat missile.) So it should slow down at a lower rate.

Would you be interested in taking a shot at a 2 or 3-stage ATACMs? I can send you some models.

TEL.jpg

Good to see you here.

I have tested ATACMS options with booster (https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/1 ... n-for.html)

I am now currently code-working for Flight-SIM capable of full-flight simulation including T.O/L.D/SID/STAR/Optimal Cruise