Page 1 of 1

F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 05 Apr 2021, 23:07
by Corsair1963
"I think the F-16 can beat just about any fighter in the world today. Of course, I'm happy to say the F-22 and F-35 are on our side!" Colonel Sonny "Blink" Blinkinsop F-16 Viper Driver.




https://theaviationgeekclub.com/f-16-pi ... NcoU-a9PkU

Re: F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 07 Apr 2021, 11:27
by hornetfinn
IMO, F-16 is a great design that got to a real sweet spot for a fighter aircraft. It was small enough to be really nimble and agile while having a lot of power to zoom and boom. It also has aerodynamics very well matched to most combat speeds and altitudes. It got so close to what a human pilot could really use, that getting significantly better in BFM is not easy.

Re: F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 07 May 2021, 04:52
by saberrider
To me the Eurofighter Typhoon is better.

Re: F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 07 May 2021, 09:25
by hornetfinn
saberrider wrote:To me the Eurofighter Typhoon is better.


Yes, it's probably somewhat better in BFM, especially at higher altitudes (more thrust and bigger wing). I think of EF Typhoon like a turbocharged F-16. Basically a slick EF Typhoon is probably fairly similar to an F-22 without high-AoA capability in BFM. F-16 is still a serious adversary against both especially at lower altitudes. A lot depends on the pilot as all are so high performance machines that there isn't much room for error.

Re: F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 09 May 2021, 12:37
by Patriot
Italians have said that even their "small thrust" Block 15 F-16s were better in BFM than Eurofighter anywhere below 10 000ft MSL...

Re: F-16 vs XYZ

Unread postPosted: 10 May 2021, 16:20
by icemaverick
Any decent Typhoon pilot would avoid lower altitude dogfights with an F-16. The Tiffy excels in the high and fast arena. It probably has a kinematic edge over the F-16 in most realistic combat scenarios.