Forum: Mishaps

Another Aircraft Mishap - B2 Crash



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2008 - 11:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
Lets see; to put this in a "Viper Prespective"...

B-2 "Spirit" stealth bomber - $1.157 Billion (1998 Dollars)
F-16C Block50/52 - $18.8 Million (1998 Dollars)

1157 / 18.8 = 61.5

Lose one (1) B-2 equals the financial loss of 61 F-16s!? Bang Head

How many fighter wings is that? Shocked

Hope the press is correct and the crew is truely OK.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 11:47 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Hookturn
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 12:00 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 27, 2004 - 10:49 AM
Posts: 70

That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Lose one (1) B-2 equals the financial loss of 61 F-16s!? Bang Head


(having way too manienth beer tonight, so I hope I'm excused before I make the next remark. And it isn't pointed at you, TEG, I think you basically thought the same thing as myself when you wrote that)

Does 1 B-2 really equal 61 F-16s in these modern conflicts? Barring the one mission, infiltrate a large country with a large, modern and sophisticated air defence, is there a single mission (or a series of missions) where a single B-2 would perform better than 61 F-16s?

I personally find myself thinking even with the F-22 and B-2, that is it really: 2*mission efficiency > 2*sortie generation*twice the amount of units flying?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ATFS_Crash
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 01:29 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:28 AM
Posts: 760

Hookturn wrote:
Does 1 B-2 really equal 61 F-16s in these modern conflicts? Barring the one mission, infiltrate a large country with a large, modern and sophisticated air defence, is there a single mission (or a series of missions) where a single B-2 would perform better than 61 F-16s?

I personally find myself thinking even with the F-22 and B-2, that is it really: 2*mission efficiency


The B-2 obviously wasn't made for small countries with no or limited air defenses; there is obviously part of you that realizes that since he threw in some of the qualifiers.

Therefore I really think it's foolish comparing the B-2 to the F-16 in most circumstances, because it is doubtful the B-2 would be used when an F-16 is practical.

There are times when even the B-2 could be handy on small lower technology countries. Let's say you want to take out as much of the command staff of an enemy as possible with as little collateral damage as possible. With the B-2 it would be easy to sneak up and ripple off a large number of GPS bombs that would take out most of the command staff before they could get done soiling themselves. If you tried to do the same thing with a bunch of F-16s, they are not as stealthy so there would likely be some hint they are in the area, also the attack probably wouldn't be as coordinated or sudden. You know as soon as the first bomb goes off that the rest of the targets will probably be seeking shelter. Of course that tactic would only work if all the targets were in a densely packed area.

I thought the B-2 was well demonstrated when operation Iraqi freedom hit Baghdad. It was nice to see much of Saddam's shelters and his command staff quarters to be knocked out within minutes. It's too bad that Saddam and his command staff knew we were coming and were cowering in spider holes and other shelters.

Another advantage to the B-2 in some circumstances is the loiter time ability.

Each aircraft is designed for a niche and different tactics. They over lap each other to some extent however how practical and efficient they do their job can very depending on the scenario/application.

It's another case of apples and oranges.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 06:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Agree with you ATFS, and hopefully that is where that argument will end. Otherwise this thread will be doomed to remain Off Topic

The B-2, while expensive, is there to do a job, that only two other planes can do, neither of which have an RCS as low as it does. Plus the argument, as far as cost per Class A goes, is invalid, because one could also ask, "How many aircraft of a specific airframe could have been purchased with all of the combined Viper Class As since 1979?"

Back On Topic I think what should be said is that the B-2 went 20 years from the time it was unveiled to the public and 16 years into its operational career, until the time of its first Class A. Also the program, while expensive, has been far more successful than any other attempt at a flying wing. Please note that it was a previous flying wing, the YB-49, which rather dubiously gave Edwards AFB its name. Had there never been a YB-49, two things might have happened: 1) There would probably never have been a B-2, and 2) Edwards would either still be named Muroc, or would've been named after another test pilot, like say Mel Apt.

Over 15 years of operational flying with only one Class A. That is definitely a record to be envied. What was the last mass produced airframe in the USAF that went that long without a Class A? The EC-135 series of aircraft? IIRC, they went 26+ years of accident free hours, with at least one aircraft constantly flying. Another aircraft comes to mind would be the E-4 NAOC. The KC-10 has never had an airborne mishap, but they did lose one at Barksdale in a ground refueling mishap. It burned straight to the ground, and one fuels troop was killed.

So, before anyone starts bad-mouthing the B-2 program, take a look at what it has accomplished. Yes, it's expensive, but it also lives in a pretty small circle as far as a long-term safety record goes up until this point, and it is still very capable of accurately putting several bombs on several targets and doing very good things to many bad people, and has proven so many times.

Of course, when the last B-1 and B-2 go to AMARC, those crews will fly back to their units in a B-52, but that's a completely different story. Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 12:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799

Youtube AP footage of the scene. Video: Raw Video: B-2 Stealth Crash in Guam

The Telegraph wrote:

US military grounds stealth bomber fleet
By William Lowther in Washington and Ben Martin
Last Updated: 3:30am GMT 24/02/2008



America's entire B-2 stealth bombing fleet, which has played a crucial part in all major conflicts since 1999, has been grounded after one of the jets crashed near a military base in Guam.

The crash - the first involving the £610 million plane - was the most expensive single aircraft accident in history.

A senior US military source told The Sunday Telegraph that all remaining B-2 stealth bombers were on a "no-fly" order and that there would be no further take-offs until the initial investigation into the crash had been completed.

Officials assume the crash was caused by either mechanical failure or human error, but have grounded B-2s to ensure there is not some fundamental fault developing in the 21-strong fleet.

The grounding means that a major component of the US military is out of action. The jets are normally stationed at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, but have been deployed to the Pacific territory of Guam to maintain the US military presence in the Asia-Pacific region and deter potential enemies from taking surprise military action while other American forces are diverted to fight in the Middle East.

The Pentagon's reliance on the plane's ability to evade radar, making it difficult for defensive systems to detect, track and attack, means the no-fly order is unlikely to last more than a few days.

Two crew members on board the bomber managed to eject safely before the crash, which occurred at 10.40am Saturday near Andersen Air Force Base, on the American island territory, 3,700 miles south-west of Hawaii.

The crash occurred shortly after take-off, sending thick black smoke billowing from the wreckage of the plane. The military source said there were no munitions on board and the plane was on a routine training flight.

The source said that while the plane had been destroyed, he believed - but was not certain - that the vital computer recorder which monitors all engine and flight developments had been recovered. Jeanne Ward, who was on the base visiting her husband, said crowds began to gather as emergency services arrived. "Everybody was on their cell phones, and the first thing everyone wanted to know was did the pilots make it out in time,'' she said.

The B-2 bomber, which was among the US military's most closely-guarded secrets during its development in the 1980s, made its first combat bombing runs in Kosovo in 1999 and has been used in missions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Serbia.

It is flown by a pilot and a mission controller and has a range of 6,850 miles without refuelling. The US military says the plane, which can be refuelled in mid-air, can stay airborne as long as maintenance and crew fatigue allow.

The aircraft's systems allow one pilot to fly the plane while the other sleeps, prepares a hot meal or uses the plane's flushing toilet system. The B-2, which can carry 50,000 lb of ordnance and can drop up to 80 bombs in a single run past a target, is equipped to carry nuclear weapons.

During the 1980s, when the US was battling for supremacy in the Cold War against the Soviet Union, an estimated £11 billion was spent on developing the stealth bomber. But the break-up of the Soviet state meant that plans to build up to 135 of the planes were abandoned, and only 21 were ever made.

The American military closely guards the technical secrets which give the plane its "stealth" qualities. In October 2005, Noshir Gowadia, an Indian-born American design engineer, who worked on the stealth bomber project, was arrested for allegedly selling classified information about the plane to China. His trial was due to start this month, but has been postponed several times.

The US Air Force said one of the B-2 crew was in hospital in a stable condition and the other was released after a brief medical examination. "They have been evaluated by medical authorities and are in good condition," it said in a statement.

Guam, which was captured from Spain by US forces in 1898, has been a bomber base since March 2004. B-52, B-2 and B-1 bombers deploy on rotation from bases on the US mainland.

The crash came just four days after two F-15C Eagle jet fighters collided off the coast of Florida. Both pilots from the single-seat jets ejected from their planes and were rescued after a search by US Coast Guard and local fishing vessels, but one died soon after.

The US Air Force grounded its about 450 of its 700-strong F-15 fleet in November, after one failed during a training flight in Missouri, forcing a pilot to eject. He survived with minor injuries.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... ber223.xml

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 01:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799

Indentifed as Spirit of Kansas - s/n #89-0127
Ordered 1989, Delivered to USAF 16 Feb, 1995. Arrived at Whiteman 17 Feb, 1995.

KansasCity.com wrote:

Loss of B-2 jet marks the first time one has crashed in nearly two decades
By SCOTT CANON
The Kansas City Star

Uncle Sam’s arsenal is suddenly 80 tons lighter and absent $2.2 billion-plus of irreplaceable, high-tech bomber firepower.

Still, the crash of the Spirit of Kansas stealth bomber on takeoff from Guam this weekend marks just the first time in almost two decades of flying that a B-2 has fallen from the sky.

Analysts said the remaining 20 stealth bombers — even with half a dozen typically out of commission for maintenance or upgrades — give the Pentagon more than enough jet-powered muscle for virtually any air attack.

They said that the crash, which left one of the plane’s pilots hospitalized in Guam, wouldn’t raise serious alarms about the bomber’s safety.

“I guess you could say the B-2 was due,” said Owen Cote, a military specialist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “There’s not a plane in our inventory that hasn’t crashed. The odds were bound to catch up, even with a small force like the B-2.”

Air Force spokesmen released only sketchy details Saturday about the crash. They confirmed that the plane crashed shortly after becoming airborne while taking off from Andersen Air Force Base about 10:30 a.m. Guam time, or about 6:30 p.m. Friday Kansas City time. The cause was under investigation.

The pilots were able to eject from the jet shortly before it crashed onto the tarmac. One pilot received minor injuries, and the other was kept at Guam Naval Hospital in stable condition. The pilots’ names were not released Saturday. No one on the ground was injured, and no buildings were damaged.

Built in 1989, the Spirit of Kansas was among four stealth bombers that had been flying training missions from Guam since October. It had no munitions on board and was headed to Whiteman Air Force Base near Knob Noster, Mo., with the three other jets.

Whiteman is about 60 miles east of Kansas City and home to the stealth bomber, although the jets have increasingly been deployed to Guam. Typhoon-proof hangars built especially for the planes were completed on the Pacific outpost about two years ago.

The bomber was the second of the aircraft to take off for Whiteman from Guam on Saturday. The first quickly returned to another runway on the island, and the other two jets remained on the base. An Air Force spokesman said it was unclear when the three remaining stealth bombers would leave for Whiteman.

After an F-117 stealth fighter was detected and shot down in Kosovo in 1999, reports surfaced that Serbian troops invited Russian engineers to study the debris.

The Guam crash comes after years of B-2 flights without catastrophes. The plane took its first flight in 1989, and the first combat-ready B-2 touched down at Whiteman in 1993. The last arrived four years later.

Once projected for a much larger fleet, only 21 were ever made, at a cost of $2.2 billion a copy, with hundreds of millions more spent on subsequent repairs and upgrades.

It was originally designed in an arms race with the Soviets for the sole purpose of delivering nuclear bombs. Strategists once spoke of it as a plane that would have nowhere to land on its first combat sortie because it would be delivering a payload unleashed only in all-out nuclear war.

But by the time it was built, the Cold War was over. The Air Force quickly reconfigured the jet’s belly-flush bomb bay to carry conventional weapons, although the B-2 remains part of the country’s nuclear arsenal.

The fleet has a combined 75,000 flight hours. That includes nearly 100 combat missions. It first struck in nonstop flights from Missouri to the former Yugoslavia in 1999 in the NATO effort to protect Kosovo against Serbian oppression. It dropped a bomb on the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, a hit blamed on outdated maps.

B-2s were airborne for more than a day in nonstop missions from Whiteman to Afghanistan in 2001. And at the start of the Iraq war, it flew 22 sorties from the British-controlled Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and 27 more from Whiteman.

It has no tail and was shaped to avoid all manner of air defenses. By military standards, its subsonic speeds are turtle-like. And the bomber’s flight plans are elaborate efforts to sail above and around enemy radar.

That means its pilots don’t yank and bank their aircraft like fighter jets. Rather, they manage an array of computer controls designed to keep the plane out of view and to unleash sometimes dozens of satellite-guided bombs on an array of targets.

Experts said that may be one factor in why the planes had flown so safely over the years.

“It’s not a lot of close-formation flying. Not a lot of barrel rolls,” said John Pike, the security analyst who runs GlobalSecurity.org. “Some of the types of things that would get an airplane in trouble, they’re just not going to go there.”

No plane will be built to replace the Spirit of Kansas, only partly because the assembly lines that piece the B-2 together were shut down years ago. Although bomber maker Northrop Grumman Corp. tried in recent years to sell the Pentagon more B-2s, the Air Force chose to pass.

“Losing one aircraft is not going to hurt their ability to do what they think they need to do,” said William Hartung, a military analyst at the New American Foundation.

Military planners find the B-2 most valuable in the first nights of an air barrage, before the battering of air defenses. More recently, it’s been identified as the plane most likely to blast Iran’s nuclear program.

Last fall the Bush administration asked Congress for millions to pair the bomber with the 15-ton Massive Ordnance Penetrator — a bunker-busting bomb designed for underground targets — in what was interpreted widely as a warning to Tehran.

“Iran would be its next big mission,” MIT’s Cote said of the B-2. “Realistically speaking, they wouldn’t need very many B-2s for that.”

Source: http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/502870.html

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 01:15 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799

AviationWeek.Com wrote:

B-2 Crashes on Takeoff From Guam

Feb 23, 2008
By Michael O. Lavitt

A B-2 stealth bomber crashed on takeoff from Andersen AFB, Guam, on Saturday morning, the U.S. Air Force reported.

The Spirit of Kansas, Tail No. 890127, was the first B-2 bomber to crash from the fleet of 21 built by Northrop Grumman Corp.

The two pilots ejected. One was in stable condition with unspecified injuries at a naval hospital in Guam, while the other was released after a medical evaluation, TSgt. Tom Czerwinski of Pacific Air Forces public affairs office said.

The aircraft was one in a flight of four B-2s that was returning to Whiteman AFB, Mo., following a deployment that began Oct. 5, Czerwinski said. They were being replaced in the constant bomber presence role at Andersen by six B-52s.

The Spirit of Kansas crashed on the runway shortly after takeoff at about 10:30 a.m. local time, Czerwinski said. It was not clear whether the crew had declared an emergency before ejecting.

Skies were clear, and there was no indication that weather contributed to the crash.

The other B-2s returned to Andersen. Czerwinski said it was not clear how many of the four had taken off before the crash.

The B-2 Spirit first flew in July 1989, and the first operational aircraft was delivered in December 1993. The B-2 made its combat debut in Operation Allied Force against Serbian targets, flying nonstop missions from Whiteman.

Source: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/ ... h02238.xml

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 02:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
OK - True, I was only pointing out the "fiscal loss" of one B-2 versus F-16s, and I will agree that bombers are still needed in a proper mix with conventional fighters, BUT...

I'd rather see two dozen FB-22 or F/A-22s attacking targets than 20 hugely expensive bombers. (For the NEXT generation) I realize B-2s were developed and purchased during a different time, (Commies and all...) and they do serve a strategic deterrence so it's a mute point to discount them today.

I guess I'd feel a little different if we (Congress/DOD/USAF/etc) had purchased 100 of them. 20 aircraft in a single fleet seems like a waste of logistics/maintenance money. When the numbers were slashed today's low "20" the USAF should have given up and differed the $$ into something else. Maybe public outcry over the BILLIONS spend on a defunct program would have gotten Congress to buy more?

Congress sure knows how to kill BILLIONS of R&D money, that is for sure. Lets hope they don't do the same to the Raptor/Lightening II. (Limit production to "special" airframe status)

By 2045, we'll have 12 B-52H, 6 B-1Bs, 2 B-2, 48 F-35, and 24 F-22. We're likely to have them stationed at an army base because it won't be worth keeping an actual "AF Base" to fly them from. BRAC 2035 will close them all. All maintenance will be contracted to the OEMs to save money. They'll likely combine us with the Army as well, to save money on uniform changes each new AF administration wants... Rolling Eyes

There will be no need for new contracts/aircraft either; China is sure to give up all of their new fighter/bomber programs due to expense.... right? Shrug

Sorry, I suppose I'm having a pessimistic day? See you all in the VA home FY2055! Cheers (If beer isn't outlawed by then...)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2008 - 10:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
Well...if anything positive can be said about it, at least it went down inside the base perimeter where the wreckage can be controlled and not over hostile territory where "unauthorized personnel" could get their hands on it.

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasdave901
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 02:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 31, 2007 - 11:08 AM
Posts: 226

Status: Offline
Silly comparison of course Wink What's easier to stealthily scramble, two B-2's or 122 F-16's? Never mind the coordination, JP, and overtime!! You know what would be easier?
small time dictator: "We will kill the infidel! We will destroy America!"
secret agent:"Pssst! Mr. Dictator, here's $1.157 billion in cash, and keep the C-130 we used to haul it in as a gift. Now shut up!"
(I wish it was this easy!)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 03:17 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
akruse21 wrote:
Saw a post over on another forum that made me chuckle. Was talking about the rumor that if the crew of a B-2 tried to pull the handles, the CSAF would pop up on their MPDs telling them that they better try harder Smile


I was lucky enough to be a flight tester on the B-2 in the early days (89-92). During that period the aircraft, like every other one before it, was experiencing weight growth and the contractor was paying bonuses to anyone that presented an idea to shave weight (of course it had to be implemented).

Some USAF wag playfully submitted an idea to remove the ejection seats, suggesting that it would be less painful to ride it in than to experience the post crash interrogation. Wasn't forwarded...go figure.

As for the math that the plane cost $2.2B...well that drives me nuts. 75% of that cost was development and produced nothing. The remaining 25% was the actual production cost (about $500M per jet). After the fact math, while true, misses the fact that Congress dorked with it after initially approving the program, and that the huge R&D investment was made with the assumption that it would be minor when amortized over a large production run that didn't happen. Same thing for F-22.

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 03:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

Roscoe wrote:
As for the math that the plane cost $2.2B...well that drives me nuts. 75% of that cost was development and produced nothing. The remaining 25% was the actual production cost (about $500M per jet).


Can't be said enough. People rag on the B-2 because of the price, but honestly it's not a fair calculation to roll the R&D into the cost of each plane that way. I mean a new 747-800 costs what, $300M? Kind of puts it in perspective what you get for the money.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Elliboom
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 04:14 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 05, 2006 - 07:21 PM
Posts: 426
Location: Lincoln, NE
Status: Offline
By the looks of the pictures the jet came to rest only about 2/3 of the way down the runway, and it looks like it might have stopped between the runway and the East heavy ramp. Good thing it stopped or it could have made one hell of a mess. I hate to speculate, but knowing how heavily the B-2 relies on computers for stable flight my guess would be some sort of massive flight computer failure right after rotation. But the only thing that really matters is that the crew is ok and will make it home to their families.


Last edited by Elliboom on Feb 25, 2008 - 11:19 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACMIguy
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 04:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:13 PM
Posts: 667

Status: Offline
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
OK - True, I was only pointing out the "fiscal loss" of one B-2 versus F-16s, and I will agree that bombers are still needed in a proper mix with conventional fighters, BUT...

I'd rather see two dozen FB-22 or F/A-22s attacking targets than 20 hugely expensive bombers. (For the NEXT generation) I realize B-2s were developed and purchased during a different time, (Commies and all...) and they do serve a strategic deterrence so it's a mute point to discount them today.

I guess I'd feel a little different if we (Congress/DOD/USAF/etc) had purchased 100 of them. 20 aircraft in a single fleet seems like a waste of logistics/maintenance money. When the numbers were slashed today's low "20" the USAF should have given up and differed the $$ into something else. Maybe public outcry over the BILLIONS spend on a defunct program would have gotten Congress to buy more?

Congress sure knows how to kill BILLIONS of R&D money, that is for sure. Lets hope they don't do the same to the Raptor/Lightening II. (Limit production to "special" airframe status)

By 2045, we'll have 12 B-52H, 6 B-1Bs, 2 B-2, 48 F-35, and 24 F-22. We're likely to have them stationed at an army base because it won't be worth keeping an actual "AF Base" to fly them from. BRAC 2035 will close them all. All maintenance will be contracted to the OEMs to save money. They'll likely combine us with the Army as well, to save money on uniform changes each new AF administration wants... Rolling Eyes

There will be no need for new contracts/aircraft either; China is sure to give up all of their new fighter/bomber programs due to expense.... right? Shrug

Sorry, I suppose I'm having a pessimistic day? See you all in the VA home FY2055! Cheers (If beer isn't outlawed by then...)



I say lets sell ad space on the jets and flight suits. Idea Thumb
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2008 - 11:07 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
ACMIguy wrote:
I say lets sell ad space on the jets and flight suits. Idea Thumb

I can just see the post-strike brief:

Briefer: "How'd it go?"

Commander: "Well sir....the Home Depot-FedEx-Budweiser-Snap On-Quaker Oats-Ace Hardware-Olive Garden "Spirit of Talladega" B-2 performed real well. The crew worked real hard all week to get 'er set up nice and tight and she flew like a rocket sled on rails. That first pit stop at 35K took a little longer than normal but then again we DID take on about 100,000 pounds.

Our wingman in the Miller Lite-Edge Gel-Charmin-Hardee's-Kleenex-Viagra-KFC "Spirit of Rockingham" checked in right on cue and we pressed in and struck all intended targets. The place lit up later but we weren't sure if it was because of us or because Jeff Gordon may have actually won somethin'."

Wink

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic