| Author |
Message |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Jul 08, 2007 - 11:54 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2208
Status: Offline
|
BINGO!!! On <a href="http://www.airliners.net">airliners.net</a> I found this very rare shot of a Raptor (00-4012) with lowered arresting hook: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1171720/L/
Anybody who can/will provide us close-up shots of the Raptor´s arresting gear? The F-16.net team would be very grateful! |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 22, 2013 - 12:03 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Jul 09, 2007 - 02:38 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613
Status: Offline
|
If you've got acces to Jay Miller's excellent book on the F-22 by Aerofax there are a lot of closeups of the tail hook. It's amazing the attention to detail Lockheed spent. Even the edges of all of those doors, narrow as they are, are edge-aligned.
http://www.amazon.com/Lockheed-Martin-2 ... 608&sr=1-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Jul 09, 2007 - 05:30 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1305
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Jul 09, 2007 - 08:44 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 545
Status: Offline
|
| I always thought it was there for RCS purposes, I mean, besides separating the two TVC engine nozzles and channeling their thrust it also reduced the RCS. A pointed out edge is better than a blunt and flat surface for stealth. |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_One
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2007 - 12:46 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 19, 2004 - 09:19 AM
Posts: 1092
|
|
PhillyGuy wrote:
I always thought it was there for RCS purposes, I mean, besides separating the two TVC engine nozzles and channeling their thrust it also reduced the RCS. A pointed out edge is better than a blunt and flat surface for stealth.
No doubt it's shaped the way it is for stealth purposes. As for whether it houses any super secret avionics, I don't know. If it's meant to house something inside there, it could easily have been made "non stealthy" yet aerodynamic. Look at the tail pods between the engines on the Su-27/30/35/etc. There's obviously something back there. I'm not so sure if there's much avionics gear in the F-22's tail extension. It might just be there to improve aerodynamic performance and stealth properties. And by aerodynamic performance, I mean aerodynamic performance of the exhaust gases in addition to the main airflow mass coming off the top and bottom portions of the fuselage. One more thing to consider... wake turbulence. The F-22's aerodynamic design supposedly aims to reduce wake turbulence which can be detected by pulse-doppler radar (what does your local weather man use to detect storms, clouds, etc.?). You want smooth flow off the back end of the aircraft when it's cruising along at high altitude.
In conclusion, I'd guess that anything housed in the F-22's tail fairing is more of an afterthought. The primarily purpose for this design feature is likely increased aerodynamic & propulsion performance and, as you suggested, stealth. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2007 - 12:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2208
Status: Offline
|
| Thanks to checksixx for his video link of the F-22's arresting gear in action at Kadena AB! |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mushmouth
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2007 - 11:16 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jul 11, 2006 - 06:59 AM
Posts: 258
Status: Offline
|
Welcome To The Twilight Zone  |
_________________ 00-06 Shaw GE-129
06-07 & 11-12 ROK GE-100
07-11 Dyess B1B GE-102
11-12 Kunsan GE-100
12-'' JBMDL CF-6
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 01:26 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2208
Status: Offline
|
| What are your news, Mushmouth? |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
|
|
|
|
 |
|
flateric
|
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 03:20 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 22, 2006 - 10:56 PM
Posts: 83
Location: Moscow/Russia
Status: Offline
|
|
sferrin wrote:
The thing about the radar blockers in the F-22's exhaust is it's not like it's a secret.
http://tinyurl.com/3nh2wnu
Quote:
Screech, the F135 and the JSF Engine War
Posted by Graham Warwick at 3/17/2011 1:33 PM CDT
...
Pratt points out that the F119 and F135 are the only production engines with stealthy augmentors. Their design eliminates conventional spray bars and flame holders and integrates multi-zone reheat fuel injection into curved vanes that block the line-of-sight to the turbine.
...
|
_________________ www.secretprojects.co.uk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_DCTR
|
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 03:35 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661
Status: Offline
|
| The "spike" in the back of the jet is not a radar blocker. The inner portions are removable panels called keelson panels or AMNS panels that are removed when the engines are pulled. Arresting gear actuators and linkages are housed in the rest of the "spike" |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
flateric
|
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 05:16 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 22, 2006 - 10:56 PM
Posts: 83
Location: Moscow/Russia
Status: Offline
|
|
Raptor_DCTR wrote:
The "spike" in the back of the jet is not a radar blocker.
yes, sure. I just can't understand how topic moved from 'sting' thing to blockers
and - 'sting' itself |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
29.62 KB |
| Viewed: |
8531 Time(s) |

|
_________________ www.secretprojects.co.uk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_DCTR
|
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 08:27 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661
Status: Offline
|
|
flateric wrote:
sferrin wrote:
The thing about the radar blockers in the F-22's exhaust is it's not like it's a secret.
http://tinyurl.com/3nh2wnu
Quote:
Screech, the F135 and the JSF Engine War
Posted by Graham Warwick at 3/17/2011 1:33 PM CDT
...
Pratt points out that the F119 and F135 are the only production engines with stealthy augmentors. Their design eliminates conventional spray bars and flame holders and integrates multi-zone reheat fuel injection into curved vanes that block the line-of-sight to the turbine.
...
Yes, which is accomplished by the shape of the augmenter section of the ENGINE, and not the "spike" shape of the the arresting gear and keelson section. There is NOTHING in the "spike" other than the keelson panels and the arresting gear linkage. If you still don't believe me or checksixx, then whatever. You will believe whatever you want. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
flateric
|
Posted: Apr 05, 2011 - 09:37 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 22, 2006 - 10:56 PM
Posts: 83
Location: Moscow/Russia
Status: Offline
|
|
Raptor_DCTR wrote:
If you still don't believe me or checksixx, then whatever. You will believe whatever you want.
err, once again, I did know it from the beginning - if you have read my previous post
I never mixed both things up |
_________________ www.secretprojects.co.uk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|