| Author |
Message |
|
KeithTCU82
|
 Posted: May 04, 2007 - 12:29 AM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 30, 2005 - 04:32 PM
Posts: 28
Status: Offline
|
| Today at NAS Fort Worth (5-3-07) |
| Description: |
| Someone with a scanner had heard it was something related to brakes. |
|
| Filesize: |
121.28 KB |
| Viewed: |
8313 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
465.51 KB |
| Viewed: |
8309 Time(s) |
|
_________________
Keith Robinson
http://www.pbase.com/keith1959
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Sep 03, 2010 - 3:24 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair1963
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 02:39 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1765
Status: Offline
|
Man as long as the aircraft isn't damaged...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwightlooi
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 05:00 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 01:14 AM
Posts: 1170
Status: Offline
|
| The F-35 looks fantastically sleek and pretty from these two angles though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PhillyGuy
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 07:43 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 455
Status: Offline
|
| Man, you really get a sense of how big and tall the F-35 is with that guy standing next to it, it puts things into perspective... |
_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neno
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 08:28 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 11:35 AM
Posts: 192
Status: Offline
|
| It gives me the impression of an aircraft built around his engine.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
idesof
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 10:27 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 29, 2006 - 11:59 PM
Posts: 638
Status: Offline
|
|
dwightlooi wrote:
The F-35 looks fantastically sleek and pretty from these two angles though.
You remind me of "Shallow Hall," that movie where the guy looked at his girlfriend, who was hugely obese and ugly, and she looked to him like Gwyneth Paltrow. I'm sorry but the F-35 is one ugly mutha. Without a doubt the ugliest of all new fighter aircraft in the world. Looks is one aspect where the Eurofrauder Typhoon has got the F-35 beat hands down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lurch
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 02:50 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 09:42 PM
Posts: 274
Status: Offline
|
Hopefully, It's just a minor problem, and it's back up in the air soon.
I'm stuck in the middle on it's looks. It's not pretty and it's not ugly, it's just there. |
_________________
Crew Chief
Torrejon 614th Lucky Devils 87-0248
Homestead/Moody 307th Stingers 89-2054 (Comander's CC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKopack
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 04:13 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 827
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
Two comments from me (neither of which may mean anything, but I'll throw them out anyway...)
I'm with Lurch as far as the looks go, it seems that every other picture I see I go back and forth from 'good looking jet' to... All the while I'm thankful though for what 'could have been': Several years ago I was at the NAS Oceana airshow standing next to a Navy Hornet driver who was staring, open-mouthed, at the full-sized Boeing JSF mock-up. I said "You know what's even worse? Imagine it in Blue Angels (and Thunderbirds) markings..."
My second comment is for Keith Robinson, the photographer. Keith, don't you have a job, or are you lucky enough to be taking these from your porch? I've had your 'first flight' photo (from Fencecheck) as my Windows background for a couple of months now, and it seems that every time they pull the bird out of the barn, you're there to catch it! Great job covering the beginning of what will be the next 30+ years of military aviation.
Mike Kopack |
_________________
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeithTCU82
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2007 - 10:23 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 30, 2005 - 04:32 PM
Posts: 28
Status: Offline
|
|
MKopack wrote:
My second comment is for Keith Robinson, the photographer. Keith, don't you have a job, or are you lucky enough to be taking these from your porch? I've had your 'first flight' photo (from Fencecheck) as my Windows background for a couple of months now, and it seems that every time they pull the bird out of the barn, you're there to catch it! Great job covering the beginning of what will be the next 30+ years of military aviation.
Mike Kopack
Luck. . . and I have a job where I go in at 3pm so that helps. Also living less than 5 miles from Lockheed-Martin/NAS Fort Worth is also an advantage. I pulled up yesterday not knowing anything about the F-35 having problems and looked down the runway to see it surrounded by emergency vehicles. |
_________________
Keith Robinson
http://www.pbase.com/keith1959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ztex
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 06:02 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Dec 13, 2006 - 05:17 PM
Posts: 132
Status: Offline
|
Luck?!
You are one "lucky" SOB... 
Good catch!
Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeithTCU82
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 07:01 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 30, 2005 - 04:32 PM
Posts: 28
Status: Offline
|
Thanks Z
I have since found out that the F-35 had an electrical malfunction, and not a brake problem. Sorry for the misinformation. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
127.8 KB |
| Viewed: |
7493 Time(s) |
|
_________________
Keith Robinson
http://www.pbase.com/keith1959
|
|
|
|
|
|
idesof
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 06:20 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 29, 2006 - 11:59 PM
Posts: 638
Status: Offline
|
|
KeithTCU82 wrote:
Thanks Z
I have since found out that the F-35 had an electrical malfunction, and not a brake problem. Sorry for the misinformation.
Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKopack
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 06:45 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 827
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
idesof wrote:
Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?
Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?
If airplanes fly they are going to break - especially when it's a unique, hand-built, very pre-production bird. Military aviation isn't like jumping in your car.
Mike |
_________________
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpion1alpha
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 08:30 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator
Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1183
Status: Offline
|
|
MKopack wrote:
idesof wrote:
Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?
Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?
Apparently he is.  And in regards to the flightline, I betting a big donut. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwightlooi
|
|
Posted: May 08, 2007 - 10:06 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 01:14 AM
Posts: 1170
Status: Offline
|
|
Scorpion1alpha wrote:
MKopack wrote:
idesof wrote:
Well, so much for its vaunted reliability. Any clue about the nature of the malfunction and whether it has gone back up again?
Vaunted reliability? Wow, with this 'electrical issue' and you're ready to write the whole thing off? How much time have you spent on a flightline? What do you think the ratio of Code 2 & 3's is to Code 1's?
Apparently he is. And in regards to the flightline, I betting a big donut.
We don't know how "serious" the problem is. It may be something minor enough that the aircraft will fly just fine other than a a little warning light coming on in the cockpit saying that some circuit monitoring system is reading out of the normal range. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
