The NY Times (Editorial) http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/opini ... -jets.html
Quote:
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was supposed to prove that the Pentagon could build a technologically advanced weapon system within an affordable budget, without huge delays. After the aircraft turned into the Pentagon’s biggest budget buster, and performed disappointingly, the Obama administration tried to correct course in 2010. A new report last month by the Government Accountability Office showed that the problems had not been solved.
The Air Force, the Navy and the Marines plan to buy more than 2,400 F-35s through 2037. The accountability office now estimates the total cost of acquisition at nearly $400 billion, up 42 percent from the estimate in 2007; the price per plane has doubled since project development began in 2001. Cost overruns now total $1 billion.
The agency reported other problems as well. It said that the plane would not be in full production until 2019, a delay of six years, and that the small number of planes produced so far were being delivered, on average, one year late. The F-35’s overall performance in 2011 was described as “mixed.” There also have been difficulties integrating 24 million lines of software code into the complex computer system.
As the budgets get tight, expect socialist media outlets like this to mount full-on attacks on all defense spending. A newspaper that never met a big-government social engineering project it didn't fully support, no matter the cost or no matter its effectiveness or, indeed, destructiveness, also never met a defense spending project it didn't want killed immediately in order to free up money for more entitlements.
Whatever the problems with the F-35, we're fully committed to this jet to recapitalize the fleets, something that hasn't been done for thirty years. Leon Panetta's green lighting of the F-35B and virtually flawless testing on board the Wasp doesn't even merit a mention in the article. Neither does the ahead of schedule testing running well into its second year.
The price per unit aircraft DOES need to come down drastically, but that can only ever happen if full rate production is funded. |