| Author |
Message |
|
sextusempiricus
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 10:28 AM
|
|
|
Banned
Joined: Aug 17, 2009 - 06:26 AM
Posts: 266
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Status: Offline
|
| Hey, Shep, thanks for that tidbit. On what forum did you find it? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 24, 2013 - 4:34 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 02:12 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jam2009
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 08:48 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 06, 2009 - 09:17 AM
Posts: 19
Location: Slovakia
Status: Offline
|
| funny part is, those guys don't even mention the possibility, ALR/94 could be used passively and 77 in very small beam to lock the target.... they just assume 77 was turned off whole time.. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Feb 05, 2010 - 09:34 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
|
jam2009 wrote:
funny part is, those guys don't even mention the possibility, ALR/94 could be used passively and 77 in very small beam to lock the target.... they just assume 77 was turned off whole time..
I wouldn't have expected anything more from that site if i'm honest.
I visit there each day, and whilst you do pick up the odd good titbit from the few good posters on the site I find it futile attempting reasoned debate or discussion there thanks to exceptionally dimwitted moderators who couldn't spot a troll right under thier noses and the sheer idiocy of the majority of the posters. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gf0012-aust
|
Posted: Feb 05, 2010 - 02:47 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 23, 2009 - 08:44 AM
Posts: 97
|
|
shep1978 wrote:
I wouldn't have expected anything more from that site if i'm honest.
I visit there each day, and whilst you do pick up the odd good titbit from the few good posters on the site I find it futile attempting reasoned debate or discussion there thanks to exceptionally dimwitted moderators who couldn't spot a troll right under thier noses and the sheer idiocy of the majority of the posters.
you also stand a good chance of getting banned as soon as you don't subscribe to the views of the herd...
a majority of the "prolific" members wouldn't know the difference between a 9x and a patriot but will happily preach about how "x" russian/chinese/indian missile will chew the buttocks out of "name your favourite western aircraft"
the few good posters in there have to suffer through the dribble thats pushed as fact by a chattering horde of apparently "part time" aviation and weapons systems engineers.
there's a world wide shortage of weapons/systems engineers, but if we wander off over to the key forums then all our current tasking probs would be solved quicker than a pickpocket at the races...  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
You want a giggle? Check this out:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showth ... mp;page=23
Post 675 and on, Amazing isn't it.Looks like thie comments on this site have really angered the T-50 fanatics. I can just see the thought processes that go into posts like that. something along these lines...
"How DARE they criticise the mighty majestical T-50, the worlds most advanced and most fully developed stealth fighter in the world. The fact we only have a prototype of rather questionable build quality and stealthyness, not to mention 15 years late behind the nearest competition means nothing for within a few years we will rule the sky and crush the capatalist pig-dogs with ease with our hordes of mighty unstoppable T-50 super fighters!"
I've seen fanboys but the stuff there at the moment takes the cake, well, actualy more like the whole frickin bakery! Its quite beautiful really in a warped sort of way. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
moomintroll
|
Posted: Feb 09, 2010 - 10:50 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jan 31, 2010 - 07:17 AM
Posts: 15
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
|
| The nationalistic rage you see in Russia regarding their undeserved and inexplicable fall from superpower status at the hands of the manifestly inferior Americans gives you a good glimpse into what the Weimar Republic would have been like after WW1. I really doubt that the pak-fa (when it enters service in another decade) will come close to matching the f-35, let alone the f-22, but it's certainly flesh for fantasy for Russian fanboys. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
curtiswhite
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2010 - 05:17 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 17, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1
Location: Vriginia
Status: Offline
|
| You [Link pending approval] |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
avon1944
|
Posted: May 30, 2010 - 08:15 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 394
Status: Offline
|
I just came across this information on a Typhoon website;
Jean-Louis Promé (a French journalist) in DSI Magazine "No.59" -May 2010 in discussing, the Rafale in the UAE -ATLC wrote a piece explaining a bit about the Rafale versus the Typhoon controversy;
He descibes 2 types of engagement (only one was described in the news brief):
Typhoon playing red "simulating Su-27s" against Rafale... According to him, those were WVR engagements with IR missiles and gun, and the 7-1 score happened during this training.
Now, that makes more sense now, I wonder what sort of restraints (speeds, G-loads, etc.) the Typhoon faced. If the Rafale could not readily kill an Su-27, it would have real problems against anything newer. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pilotasso
|
Posted: Jun 07, 2010 - 12:28 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 29, 2006 - 03:35 AM
Posts: 528
Status: Offline
|
| The article from April this of air forces monthly is enlightning also. Summing it up: too much noise over incocnclusive scripted exercises. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion82
|
Posted: Jun 08, 2010 - 11:34 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992
Status: Offline
|
|
gf0012-aust wrote:
shep1978 wrote:
I wouldn't have expected anything more from that site if i'm honest.
I visit there each day, and whilst you do pick up the odd good titbit from the few good posters on the site I find it futile attempting reasoned debate or discussion there thanks to exceptionally dimwitted moderators who couldn't spot a troll right under thier noses and the sheer idiocy of the majority of the posters.
you also stand a good chance of getting banned as soon as you don't subscribe to the views of the herd...
a majority of the "prolific" members wouldn't know the difference between a 9x and a patriot but will happily preach about how "x" russian/chinese/indian missile will chew the buttocks out of "name your favourite western aircraft"
the few good posters in there have to suffer through the dribble thats pushed as fact by a chattering horde of apparently "part time" aviation and weapons systems engineers.
there's a world wide shortage of weapons/systems engineers, but if we wander off over to the key forums then all our current tasking probs would be solved quicker than a pickpocket at the races...
There are much more active users over at keypub than on most other boards. The number of idiots is subsequently higher as well. I nonetheless value the much greater diversity of people over there, with different focuses as this leads to a more balanced mix of views. At places like this or SP you have a dominant majority of people with the same focus which results in some sort of collective mind. People with similar interests tend to share similar opinions. There is certainly an equal proportion of idiots/uncritical fanboys in those places, but it's more difficult to recognise them as they go with the flow. Those people just absorb the arguments put forward by the few knowledgeable members and as their views are aligned with that of the rest (not because of their expertise, but fanboyism/nationalism and whatever reasons) they are inconspicuous here.
Unfortunately those people increasingly swap over to keypubs to a larger extend now which is increasingly pulling down the level there. They register there as they are looking for trouble and show their real face which they're hiding in places like this. The lack of opposition means that the discussions lack the "action" here so they are looking for places where is more action to live out their beings and try to play the smart guy throwing around with arguments they just absorbed, but rarely understand and misinterpret them as well as lacking the knowledge to further elaborate and support "their" arguments .
The common opinion on boards like this usually results in the few "non aligned" members being immediately treated like trolls and being accused as "foreign" fanboys. The collective eventually develops some sort of anti-attitude and rarely deals with the arguments brought forward by those not entirely aligned with the rest of the pabulum, but instead replies with a prepared set of answers and simply categorising people, instead of dealing with them and their arguments independently. Black and white thinking is the easiest way for the lazy human brain to scope with. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2010 - 01:05 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
Scorpion82 wrote:
gf0012-aust wrote:
shep1978 wrote:
I wouldn't have expected anything more from that site if i'm honest.
I visit there each day, and whilst you do pick up the odd good titbit from the few good posters on the site I find it futile attempting reasoned debate or discussion there thanks to exceptionally dimwitted moderators who couldn't spot a troll right under thier noses and the sheer idiocy of the majority of the posters.
you also stand a good chance of getting banned as soon as you don't subscribe to the views of the herd...
a majority of the "prolific" members wouldn't know the difference between a 9x and a patriot but will happily preach about how "x" russian/chinese/indian missile will chew the buttocks out of "name your favourite western aircraft"
the few good posters in there have to suffer through the dribble thats pushed as fact by a chattering horde of apparently "part time" aviation and weapons systems engineers.
there's a world wide shortage of weapons/systems engineers, but if we wander off over to the key forums then all our current tasking probs would be solved quicker than a pickpocket at the races...
There are much more active users over at keypub than on most other boards. The number of idiots is subsequently higher as well. I nonetheless value the much greater diversity of people over there, with different focuses as this leads to a more balanced mix of views. At places like this or SP you have a dominant majority of people with the same focus which results in some sort of collective mind. People with similar interests tend to share similar opinions. There is certainly an equal proportion of idiots/uncritical fanboys in those places, but it's more difficult to recognise them as they go with the flow. Those people just absorb the arguments put forward by the few knowledgeable members and as their views are aligned with that of the rest (not because of their expertise, but fanboyism/nationalism and whatever reasons) they are inconspicuous here.
Unfortunately those people increasingly swap over to keypubs to a larger extend now which is increasingly pulling down the level there. They register there as they are looking for trouble and show their real face which they're hiding in places like this. The lack of opposition means that the discussions lack the "action" here so they are looking for places where is more action to live out their beings and try to play the smart guy throwing around with arguments they just absorbed, but rarely understand and misinterpret them as well as lacking the knowledge to further elaborate and support "their" arguments .
The common opinion on boards like this usually results in the few "non aligned" members being immediately treated like trolls and being accused as "foreign" fanboys. The collective eventually develops some sort of anti-attitude and rarely deals with the arguments brought forward by those not entirely aligned with the rest of the pabulum, but instead replies with a prepared set of answers and simply categorising people, instead of dealing with them and their arguments independently. Black and white thinking is the easiest way for the lazy human brain to scope with.
Are you describing yourself above? You hate the fact that the F-22 and F-35 are overwhelmingly superior to the EF so you come in and attack those planes regularly while gushing about the wonders of an obsolescent ECD. For your information, this place and SP have way more Def Pros than Key and they don't put up with Euro or Russian fanboy trolls. There's plenty of people from around the world there but it's true, they don't buy into the following myths that are the staple of Key:
1. LO isn't worth the money or other compromises
2. LO can be easily countered
3. Maneuverability and kinematics are anywhere near as important as LO and sensors.
4. The latest gizmo is going to make LO obsolete ie plasma stealth, IRST, "passive detection" "antistealth"
5. LO depends upon being absolutely invisible to all sensors at all times
6. OMG the almighty Typhoon is better than the F-22 in one minute part of the flight envelope! What a bunch of stupid Americans! Their plane obviously isn't worth the $
7. America is eveil and as an America-hating loser I want their planes to fail and foreign planes to succeed. My ultimate fantasy is for the foreign planes to roll back the tide of US led globalization that is changing MY country
Don't confuse BS with diversity of opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2010 - 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
| Have to agree with everything shingen said especially his seven points of Key. I know I can honestly say i've never seen as many complete imbeciles on any forum as I have with Key which has now pretty much become the 4chan of aviation. The moderators there are dumb as a bag of rocks too and couldn't spot a troll if it bit them. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion82
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2010 - 02:31 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992
Status: Offline
|
|
shingen wrote:
Are you describing yourself above? You hate the fact that the F-22 and F-35 are overwhelmingly superior to the EF so you come in and attack those planes regularly while gushing about the wonders of an obsolescent ECD.
Do I? I don't uncritically swallow any single claim, is that bashing? I offer some more comprehensive knowledge/information about an aircraft which most guys here have no real clue about, is that hyping? If I'm so bad it shouldn't be a problem for you to prove that, because these are strong claims, not to say accusations!
Quote:
For your information, this place and SP have way more Def Pros than Key and they don't put up with Euro or Russian fanboy trolls.
I see exactly one "DefPro" at SP, some more here, though not everyone working in the industry or serving the military is a DefPro. And working in a fraction of a field doesn't make you an all knowledgeable super expert at every area of such a huge field.
But funny just to read about Russian and Euro fanboys, Americans can't be fanboys, they are all experts and DefPros sure...
Quote:
There's plenty of people from around the world there but it's true, they don't buy into the following myths that are the staple of Key:
1. LO isn't worth the money or other compromises
2. LO can be easily countered
3. Maneuverability and kinematics are anywhere near as important as LO and sensors.
4. The latest gizmo is going to make LO obsolete ie plasma stealth, IRST, "passive detection" "antistealth"
5. LO depends upon being absolutely invisible to all sensors at all times
6. OMG the almighty Typhoon is better than the F-22 in one minute part of the flight envelope! What a bunch of stupid Americans! Their plane obviously isn't worth the $
7. America is eveil and as an America-hating loser I want their planes to fail and foreign planes to succeed. My ultimate fantasy is for the foreign planes to roll back the tide of US led globalization that is changing MY country
Don't confuse BS with diversity of opinion.
These are certainly not points you'll find me claiming, that there are fanboys and some nasty trolls all around is true, but that doesn't mean that everyone in that forum is of the same sort.
@Shep,
I agree about the moderation there, but it works in all directions. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2010 - 02:42 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
The 4chan of aviation, classic.
The F-117 shootdown has been cited probably 10,000 times there as proof that the US has wasted its time even bothering with LO. But then the Euros build Neuron so it becomes LO is only good for unmanned systems, then T-50 comes out so it changes from the EF level signature reduction is ideal to the T-50 level is ideal but that the F-22 and F-35 still go too far.
On F-16 and SP the facts seem to shape the opinions and you have the Def Pros educating noobs although I have to say the F-15 max speed thread here should have been locked and deleted. You can't allow idiocy to drive massive threads.
The fact is that anyone banned here or at SP goes to the one place that has a hair trigger on banning any pro US poster and encourages any anti US people regardless of how dumb they are.
The mods there aren't dumb, they just know what their market is and they let it happen to increase the page views. They make sure to ban anyone who hurts the feelings of their core group by pointing out things the rest of us call facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|