Forum: Air Force Life

Playboy photos USAF Female SSgt [warning: 18+]



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
usafmtl
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 11:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 29, 2006 - 02:01 AM
Posts: 9
Location: TInker AFB, OK
Status: Offline
AfterburnerDecalsScott wrote:
Quote:
As far as females posing in uniform, dude I can give you lists of sites in which US military females, in Iraq, and other places are posing nude.


Well?? Whistle


[Link pending approval] go to galleries and type in military. That is just one. Whatch it though, it's pop up [Link pending approval] Then you all know the Ammo [Link pending approval]
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 10:39 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Scanor
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 01:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 20, 2005 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 74

Really folks, what does the girls profession have to do with anything. And who cares about it anyways, I for one could not care less if she's a bartender, a cop, a nurse, or a professional modell.

It really does not matter one way or another. If she's not a professional modell, her private life and work life will be affected in exately the same way. So what she does for a living is in my view of no consequense. One should not judge her profession for what she does with her private life.

Would you have complained as much if she was, say a police officer ?? I think not :p

Nice pics btw, but why mask out her private bits ?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Lieven
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 02:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Webmaster
F-16.net Webmaster


Joined: May 23, 2003 - 04:44 PM
Posts: 2993

Scanor wrote:
Nice pics btw, but why mask out her private bits ?


Because minors also visit the website. Anyways, links to the unmasked pictures are in that same post.

BTW, here's a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dj6vOwGJ64&q=Michelle%20Manhart">YouTube video</a> of an interview with Michelle Mahart on Fox news.


Last edited by Lieven on Jan 21, 2007 - 10:20 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vinnie
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 04:36 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 436

Status: Offline
If she was the squadron intel NCO and most of the pilots were drilling her what would happen? Nothing, until the wives started to complain, it's the publicity thing, keep it hush hush and you can do almost anything,
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 08:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799

DesMoines Register wrote:
Carlson: Ex-Iowan in trouble for being out of uniform
John Carlson's Iowa

By John Carlson, Register Columnist

January 21, 2007


And you thought the biggest news out of the military last week involves a troop surge in Iraq.

Hardly.

That merely involves life and death.

Americans are far more interested in Michelle Manhart, the most famous staff sergeant in the United States Air Force. She's a drill sergeant who finds herself in big trouble for posing nude for Playboy magazine.

The 30-year-old career military woman is, of course, a former Iowan.

That's right.

The wife of an Air Force enlisted man and mother of two is a 2004 graduate of the University of Northern Iowa and a former member of the Iowa Air National Guard.

Manhart, a California native, came to Iowa in 2001 when her husband was assigned as an Air Force recruiter in Waterloo. She had been in the Air Force since 1994 and was assigned to full-time duty in the Iowa Air Guard when her husband took his Iowa assignment.

"I'd had some college when I got there but started at UNI," Manhart said in a telephone call from San Antonio, Texas, where she is currently based. "I graduated with a degree in political science. I had a pre-law minor."

She was even president of the Daniel Webster Law Society at UNI, she said. And to prove it wasn't all business, she was social chairwoman at the Alpha Xi Delta sorority at UNI.

And there was her time with the Air National Guard's 132nd Fighter Wing, which is based in Des Moines. That included a deployment to Kuwait.

She and her husband left Iowa in November 2004, when she took over duties as a drill sergeant, training new members of the Air Force at Lackland Air Force Base during their first weeks in the military.

Drill sergeants - they're called training instructors in the Air Force - are not the most beloved people in a recruit's life. In fact, the word "beloved" may never before have appeared in the same sentence with the term "drill sergeant."

In any case, Manhart showing up in Playboy almost certainly was a shock to the young men and women she has screamed at during the past couple of years. Most likely, they'd never seen her out of uniform, and in Playboy she most definitely is out of uniform.

It likely was more of a shock to Air Force commanders who, when getting a look at the 6-page layout in America's most famous nudie magazine, relieved Manhart of her duties pending an investigation to determine what regulation she may have violated.

"Hooah! The Naked Drill Sergeant," it says on the front of the February issue. And the Playboy headline writers aren't kidding. OK, she's wearing shoes in one of the photos and dog tags in another, which may be a problem for authorities. The brief article accompanying the photos is titled "Tough Love."

An official Air Force statement said, "This staff sergeant's alleged action does not meet the high standards we expect of our airmen, nor does it comply with the Air Force's core values of integrity, service before self, and excellence in all we do. It is not representative of the many thousands of outstanding airmen who serve in the U.S. Air Force today."

Manhart says that is a load of bunk, that she did not violate any rules and that she did not bring discredit to the Air Force.

"I've done my job well, and I love the Air Force," she said. "I've served my country honorably for 13 years. I think that entitles me to the same rights as every other citizen."

Talk about this thing becoming a big deal.

Google's search engine is nearly worn out from people calling up "Michelle Manhart." Nobody had heard of her a month ago, but Google her today and you get 1,090,000 hits. Very few are related to a discussion of Manhart's rights to do such a steamy photo shoot or to the Air Force's need to maintain some sense of decorum in the ranks.

For clarity's sake, she is, indeed, identified in the Playboy article as Michelle Manhart and she is reluctant to identify or bring attention to relatives. But pre-Playboy layout information released by the Air Force about her, including her duties as a drill sergeant, refers to her as Michelle Cross-Manhart.

So would she move back to Iowa?

"No way," she said. "I didn't like it."

Then she did a quick course correction and clarified.

"Actually, I loved Iowa," she said. "I loved the people. They were wonderful. I loved UNI. Going to school there changed my mind on so many things. It made me think. We lived in Fairbank and my grandparents moved there when we did. They love it, other than the fact they can't find a copy of Playboy in town. My brother ended up marrying a girl from Sumner.

"Iowa is a wonderful place. It's just the weather. I'm from California. I hate the cold. Iowa weather sucks. What can I say?"

She hopes to stay in the Air Force and remain a drill sergeant, and she thinks there's no reason it shouldn't happen.

"There's no regulation that says I can't pose for Playboy," Manhart said.

True enough, I told her. I was in the Air Force and nobody told me I couldn't pose for Playboy.

So Manhart is waiting it out, assigned to other duties for a while, hoping she gets to put back on her drill sergeant's campaign hat.

If it happens, the Air Force brass probably hopes she keeps it on.

Source: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/p ... 7701210333

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
cdhstang
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 10:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 28, 2004 - 02:30 AM
Posts: 158

Status: Offline
I have a link to about 20 pictures that she did in playboy.. Don't want to get banned here so PM me and I will sent it to ya. Unless I get the okay for a MOD..
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Lieven
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 10:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Webmaster
F-16.net Webmaster


Joined: May 23, 2003 - 04:44 PM
Posts: 2993

No problem with posting links. Feel free to do so.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 11:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

Asif wrote:
DesMoines Register wrote:
Carlson: Ex-Iowan in trouble for being out of uniform

[...]

Manhart says that is a load of bunk, that she did not violate any rules and that she did not bring discredit to the Air Force.
If you even have to think that is true, as an NCO, you are brain damaged.

"I've done my job well, and I love the Air Force," she said. "I've served my country honorably for 13 years. I think that entitles me to the same rights as every other citizen."
No it doesn't. The military and being an NCO IS NOT A CIVILIAN JOB.

[...]

So Manhart is waiting it out, assigned to other duties for a while, hoping she gets to put back on her drill sergeant's campaign hat.
Dreaming. No Training Squadron would have her.

If it happens, the Air Force brass probably hopes she keeps it on.
Just report the facts and don't guess.


Nice article that attempts to minimize the event as if she did nothing wrong. The the author of that article I would say: "Guess again".

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
cdhstang
PostPosted: Jan 21, 2007 - 11:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 28, 2004 - 02:30 AM
Posts: 158

Status: Offline
Here is the link... You will need to scroll down some..


http://www.bikinibikini.com/forum/showt ... le+manhart
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ammo_dude
PostPosted: Jan 22, 2007 - 12:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 01:27 AM
Posts: 21

Status: Offline
usafmtl wrote:
AfterburnerDecalsScott wrote:
Quote:
As far as females posing in uniform, dude I can give you lists of sites in which US military females, in Iraq, and other places are posing nude.


Well?? Whistle


http://www.imagefap.com/ go to galleries and type in military. That is just one. Whatch it though, it's pop up central... Then you all know the Ammo site.....


Dear Lord, why did you have to bring Ammo Mistress up? She is a damn good reason I HATE being an Ammo troop. She makes me wanna barf. I can't even identify parts of her anatomy. We make all the FNG Ammo troops check her and Tub Girl out as hazing when they get there.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falconfixer860261
PostPosted: Jan 22, 2007 - 02:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 17, 2005 - 04:21 PM
Posts: 984

Status: Offline
idesof wrote:
falconfixer860261 wrote:
My main problem is that she appeared in partial uniform. It's disrespectful to the uniform and all those who have died in uniform. And wearing the uniform for a commercial venture creates an association that links you to your employer. What if she was the director of the American Medical Association and did the shoot in a doctors outfit with and AMA logo on it? Or if she were a Senator and was wearing the logo of the Republican National Committee? Those organizations would also undoubtedly press charges and nobody would be surprised. In my civilian job I cannot wear articles of clothing that promote our competitors. Not that this is the same - just an example of rules regarding dress and behaviour. We are also restricted from criticizing the government while in uniform.

The uniform is a symbol of a national organization that has rules governing its wear and the behaviour of its members. She swore an oath to abide by those rules and chose to disobey them. It really isn't a matter of morality or prudishness. To me she has cheapened all the values and professionalism of the American Military Fighting Men (and Women).


But, isn't everyone in the military naked under his or her uniform? Again, it never ceases to amaze me just how similar we are to the people we are fighting. Taliban, puritan, take your pick...


Yeah - I'm sure the Taliban army would allow her to do that. I'm pretty sure she would have been executed for such behavior. And her behavior (and our acceptance of it) is one reason why many of the religious extremists want America wiped off the map.

And just becuase you are naked under your clothes doesn't mean anyone else (except maybe your life-partner) is interested in seeing you without them.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scanor
PostPosted: Jan 22, 2007 - 02:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 20, 2005 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 74

I guess a reason why Taliban and other religious extremists want to wipe both the US And the western world of the map is that they do not accept our way of life and our religions.

Why can't people just accept one another regardless of what god one worships and what traditions one follow. I'm not a christian, my religion is paganism/Wicca and that's just who I am. I'm still a human and from my point of view wether one is christian, muslim, jewish or whatever does not matter one bit.That's not anyone else's business but ones own.
Noone has the right to tell anyone what religion,what tradition to follow. What to think or what to say. That's individual freedom and everybody has equal right to make that choise.. I think the Americans call it the fift amendment or something like that. The freedom of speach and thought.

As for what this model has done or not is something she has to answer for to her superior officers. As I stated before, as long as she does this on her own, and not includes her profession. The US military should not get involved.

On the other hand if she had misused or used without permition military effects and/or property, say if she posed naked on a Humvee or on the wing of a military jet for example, that would have made this case a totally diffrent one. But as long as the pictures are relativly neutral with regards to props and location ,and the only reference to her profession is a remark that she is in the military. (granted I have not read the article in question). I have only to say, leave the girl alone.

I think that a mother of two posing in Playboy Magazine sure have guts.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Jan 22, 2007 - 05:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
No, posing for a nudie mag while you're still government property is gutsy. Stupid, but gutsy.

I think the point's been made here guys. She did it. She knew the rules, she broke them, and now she's going to lose her job over it. That may sound extreme to some, but that's just f#ckin' life. When you are in the military, you belong to the military, so you can't pick and choose which parts of the UCMJ you feel should apply to you. Just like in any other job, obey the rules, or find a new line of work.

I think we're whipping a dead horse... Rolling Eyes

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Purplehaze
PostPosted: Jan 22, 2007 - 08:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Apr 26, 2004 - 09:20 PM
Posts: 1232

Status: Offline
I agree TC, but's that is one horse I'd like to whip...... Twisted Evil
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
nitroloader
PostPosted: Jan 29, 2007 - 04:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 13, 2005 - 08:07 AM
Posts: 48

I'm not truly aware of the American military codes for this kind of behavior, however, for my standards it's not an adequate behavior for someone o represents the service and the country.
Big No No

_________________
Weapons Rules
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic