Forum: F-16 News

F-16 crash at Edwards last week



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
beaupower32
PostPosted: Sep 22, 2006 - 12:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 19, 2006 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 24

Status: Offline
Last week an F-16 crashed here at Edwards. From what I've heard, the right main landing gear wouldn't lock in the down position. After spending 2 hours trying to get it, it wouldn't lock. So they decided to land.

The last 3 numbers of the tail is 455 (unconfirmed), but I don't know the rest. As soon as I do, I will post it on here. The plane skidded along the runway, digging the right wing into the ground, and spun him around. But the pilot is ok.

If anyone knows more info or the correct info, please post on here. Im sorry if anything is incorrect on here, I'm just posting what I know so far.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jun 19, 2013 - 1:34 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Lieven
PostPosted: Sep 23, 2006 - 02:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Webmaster
F-16.net Webmaster


Joined: May 23, 2003 - 04:44 PM
Posts: 2997

Hi beaupower32,

Any further news on this?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Jon
PostPosted: Sep 23, 2006 - 03:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374

Status: Offline
If it is 455 that makes it one of the ex-embargoed Pakistani F-16s, an F-16B block 15.

92-0455
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Patriot
PostPosted: Sep 23, 2006 - 03:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Sep 02, 2006 - 06:48 PM
Posts: 254
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
I know that so far we dont have a very precise iformations about what happend in Edwards but (as beaupower32 reported) that what happend there in my opinion look rather like an emergency landing not crash and it's a big difference, doesn't it ? Let's come to the point. I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't called something a crash if we don't have accurateed and confirmed informations about that, unless that what happend is evident (for example if we know that the crew ejected) then a word crash is necesary, however, also very sorrowful and introduce sad state of affairs makes many people sad. Let's don't overuse word 'crash'. Big request for all - please consider that for future Exclamation

Thanks

_________________
Great Balls Of Fire
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
beaupower32
PostPosted: Sep 26, 2006 - 06:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 19, 2006 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 24

Status: Offline
Sorry for using crash, for it wasn't my intent to confuse people. But nothing else has come up with this yet. I am still waiting for the engine to come into the shop, and as soon as it does, I will be able to give more info. Please stay tuned. Again, I'm sorry for the mix up.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
beaupower32
PostPosted: Sep 27, 2006 - 04:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 19, 2006 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 24

Status: Offline
So I have confirmed that it is 92-0455 that slid along the runway. will be repaired though. I will try to get pictures, but that's a big *maybe*. Will let you know more when it comes up.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Dustpanandbrush
PostPosted: Oct 21, 2006 - 07:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 21, 2006 - 07:40 PM
Posts: 21

Status: Offline
Hi Beaupower

Thanks for sharing, what was the exact date of the mishap?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Jon
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2006 - 11:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374

Status: Offline
Hi beaupower32, thanks for the update. That would be great to have a photo of this F-16 as we do not have a photo of it in our database. (I know it is a maybe)

To repeat what Dustpanandbrush said, an exact date would be nice.

BTW, who decides what is a crash and what isn't. Sounds pretty objective to me. I wouldn't call it a crash, but still what is the cutoff?

Jon
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vinnie
PostPosted: Nov 02, 2006 - 01:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 436

Status: Offline
They don't call them crashes, anything that damages an acft is a mishap, of different classes i.e. class A, class B, dollar amount and injuries also play into it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Jon
PostPosted: Nov 02, 2006 - 05:00 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374

Status: Offline
Your absolutely correct on that vinnie, but what I think beaupower32 was trying to do was to relate it to civilian language. If you go through the accident database on the F-16.net aircraft database you will see we use both terms just for variety.

I think class A is over $1 million dollars, but don't know what the cut off levels are for the other classes. I'm sure it can be found somewhere on the net.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic