Forum: Air Power

Truth about Soviet technological superiority



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
boff180
PostPosted: Oct 21, 2005 - 03:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jun 29, 2005 - 11:58 AM
Posts: 927

Status: Offline
Hmm I'm not going to wade into the fight... but I will make this point... and the old saying...

One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

_________________
Andy Evans Aviation Photography
www.evansaviography.co.uk
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 3:16 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
ACSheva
PostPosted: Oct 21, 2005 - 05:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 25, 2004 - 04:48 AM
Posts: 442

Status: Offline
Quote:
3000 Chechen freedom fighters who defeated 100000 russian soldiers at Grozny back in 1995 were certainly not terrorists! Iraq is 7000 miles away from US homeland whereas Cechnia or Afghanistan is russia's next door neighbours.
There is a huge difference between these campaigns..


That is the most idiotic post Ive read so far Duplex. You should be ashamed. Evil or Very Mad

For the record, the Russians allowed the chechens to have Grozny for a reason. So that the chechens could be sorrounded. Just like what we did in Fallujah. You know what happend next in March 96. The Russians killed most of the rebels, and took control of the territory in a matter of hours using air forces, and land soldiers. They still are in control today. It was a pure military tactic, and it worked.

And that "chechen"campaign was led by Shamil Basyev Abdu Hamid(Saudi man). The same man who mastreminded the "2001 Beslan school siege". U call that a freedom fighter. Rolling Eyes By the way in that siege about 500 people died, half being kids. Chechens are not freedom fighters, they are terrorists. Even our Bush called them so.

Russian troops faced roadside bombs just like ours, and might I add beheadings also. Why dont we call the Iraqis "freedom" fighters? Arent we in their land?

Only we the US have the right to decide if they are a terrorist or not. Right?

You tell that to the mothers who got their kids blown up in the name of Allah. Russians have more of a right to fight these islamists, because they actually mess with Russia. Where as in Iraqs case, we went there first. But I dont see Russians calling the Iraqis freedom fighters.

And here is another fact for u, majority of the "freedom fighters" are not from Chechnya. They are from Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. WoW. Their number one goal is to make the Caucas a muslim nation.

Quote:
Iraq is 7000 miles away from US homeland whereas Cechnia or Afghanistan is russia's next door neighbours.


What kind of a difference does that make? If we were in Russias place we would be doing the same thing.


Quote:
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter


Thats what Bin Laden said also. Shame.

Shev


Last edited by ACSheva on Oct 21, 2005 - 11:21 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TenguNoHi
PostPosted: Oct 21, 2005 - 07:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:24 AM
Posts: 920

Status: Offline
Quote:
You see, our government ISNT ALLOWED to lie to us


For the record Shev, by the time I said this I wasnt trying to tell the truth, I was just trying to spite the guy. If I could be sure of claims like the US owning a massive laser weapon in space that can punch craters in the earth a mile wide wouldnt get shot down on this forum by other members besides sunburn I woulda said it just to see his response... :p

Our gov't doesnt really lie to us. It more or less "hides" things from us. A little bit different and the ethics change a bit but im pretty sure something as large as a b-2 downing we would hear about...

-Aaron
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Oct 22, 2005 - 12:01 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1527

Status: Offline
Shev, I am afraid it does matter which side of the fence you stand on.......I understand where BOFF is coming from.

In the American revolution, the militias were considered insurgents.By the British.
Freedom fighters by Americans. History judges them as freedom fighters.

Terror is exercised by governments and smaller groups.

The French resistance in WW2 were seen as insurgents by the Germans.

If you kill a man, you are a murderer, if you kill millions you are a conqueror.

Terror is terror. I say let history and our conscience be the judge.
Just my two...pence worth!

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACSheva
PostPosted: Oct 22, 2005 - 12:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 25, 2004 - 04:48 AM
Posts: 442

Status: Offline
Yes, Snyppa...

But when you strap a school(Beslan) loaded with kids, full of bombs. And than set em off. Is that a freedom fighter, or a terrorist? Last time I checked it was a terrorist. Or when u behead a convoy of soldiers, is that being a freedom fighter. Or being a sick cowardly terrorist. Or when u take a hospital hostage(94), and behead its patients in the name of Allah the merciful. What do u call that? Its just that we Amercians live in a small world sometimes, almost like if it only touches us than its terrorism. You know. But thats not the case anymore in todays world.

Resistance, and Terrorism are two different things.

Shev
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TenguNoHi
PostPosted: Oct 22, 2005 - 05:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:24 AM
Posts: 920

Status: Offline
Shev, the most remarkable development of American tactic in the American Revolution was guerilla warfare. We made a habbit of picking off British officers. While today you may look at that and say "so?" it is excepted because officers in modern militaries take similar responsibilities on their life as enlisted do now. However, just 150-200 years ago shooting an officer was considered highly appualing. The class of men that made up the majority of armies were either low class bottom peddlers who were trying to rise and status or conscripted mercenaries who were seen as dirty and bad for provoking wars. An officers job was NOT to put his life on the line. The term Officer and a Gentlemen comes from just that. The officer was the conscience of the army. He was a gentlemen who would keep everyone in line and mobilize the army. At this time in history common war theory was that if an army lost it's officer they would become disorderly and do things that may be considered offensive, lude, or distasteful in reflection of the country they represented. For example, someone of that time era might have believed that without an officer to control the British army in Charlston, every drooling man in the army there would have ramsacked the port town and raped every woman there was.

Also, targetting of civilians is regularly practiced in modern war. I cite examples from the Civil War and WWIs conventions of Total Warfare, and terror bombing during WW2. The only difference here is an organized power is employing these tactics. The world has become rather desynthasized to violence now a days and therefore shooting of officers doesnt seem as lude anymore... but I assure you that the saying about freedom fighters and terrorist still stands... Noone fights for no reason other than to inflict pain on others. They have a motivation. They have a goal to do something to make THEIR life better.

-Aaron
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACSheva
PostPosted: Oct 23, 2005 - 02:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 25, 2004 - 04:48 AM
Posts: 442

Status: Offline
Quote:
Also, targetting of civilians is regularly practiced in modern war.


So, does that make killing kids acceptable, if someone wants to make their "life better". Does it Aaron? Dont defend terrorists.

Shev
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
duplex
PostPosted: Oct 23, 2005 - 04:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 14, 2005 - 05:30 PM
Posts: 341

Status: Offline
<<And that "chechen"campaign was led by Shamil Basyev Abdu Hamid(Saudi man)<<

Sheva thanks for proving your complete ignorance of the subject matter..Here is a tragic story about a man called Dudayev..This might be helpful for your edification..Of course this is written by a muslim..he must be a terrorist too.

Quote:
US supplied the technology to kill Dudayev

by Abrar Mir in Moscow

On April 21, Chechen leader Dzokhar Dudayev - a formidable leader with mythical qualities - passed into history as one of the most courageous Muslim leaders of the twentieth century.

His struggle for Chechen independence from centuries of Russian oppression earned him the respect of every segment of society, including his enemies. Even the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force paid tribute to Dudayev as a 'highly moral person'. 'When there was an affront to the dignity of the Chechen people, he became their protector,' he said.

Dudayev was born on April 15, 1944, the year Josef Stalin deported tens of thousands of Chechen and Ingush people to Kazakhstan, accusing them, falsely, of collaborating with the nazis. The infant Dudayev and his family were among those deported in cattlecarts. Most of them perished on the way. Those who survived the journey succumbed to illnesses later. Dudayev miraculously survived. The Chechens were allowed to return to their homeland in 1957, four years after the death of the Georgian peasant, Stalin.

Dudayev was educated at the Tambov Aviation School in southern Russia and later at the Yuri Gagarin Aviation Academy in Moscow. His rise through military ranks was meteoric becoming the first air force general of Chechen origins. He was a karate champion and was always immaculately dressed~

From 1987 to 1990, he commanded a nuclear bomber division at the Tartu air force base in Estonia. Dudayev gained international fame when he refused an order to attack pro-independence demonstrators in the Baltic State. Instead, he allowed Estonia' s flag to fly over the base, earning the eternal gratitude of the Estonian people.

Dudayev was transferred with his unit to Grozny in 1990 where he resigned his air force rank despite being offered the position of commander of Soviet Army Aviation. The following year, he ran for the Chechen presidency as head of the Pan-National Congress of Chechen Peoples. He won more than two-thirds of the popular vote against a discredited communist leadership that had failed to condemn the abortive communist coup against Boris Yeltsin the Russian President, in August 1991.

Ironically, while Dudayev stood against the coup-plotters, Yeltsin sent in the troops two weeks after Dudayev took over as president to crush Chechenya's bid for independence (Yeltsin has now embraced Doku Zavgayev, the Chechen communist hardliner who had supported the abortive 1991 coup attempt and installed him as head of a pro-Moscow puppet government in Grozny!).

Russia' s bid in November 1991 to crush Chechenya's independence ended in disaster when the Chechens blockaded the Russian army in their barracks. They were sent packing home from Grozny minus their weapons. Dudayev renamed his Republic the 'Chechen Republic of Ichkeriya' and declared it 'outside the Russian Federation.'

In an attempt to strangle the move towards independence, Yeltsin imposed an economic blockade and Russian forces supported an armed uprising of former communists led by Umar Avturkhanov in Chechenya. These were repeatedly beaten back and hundreds of Russian soldiers captured to expose to the world the direct involvement of Moscow's troops in the assault on Chechenya.

In December 1994 Moscow was forced to come out into the open and launched a massive assault on Grozny, with defence minister Pavel Grachev boasting that it will all be over in 'two weeks'. Sixteen months later and with thousands of Russians killed as well as an estimated 80,000 Chechen civilians slaughtered, the fighting still rages on in the Caucasus mountains.

The courage of Dudayev's troops is borne out by the string of spectacular successes they have achieved against the massively- armed Russian troops. On April 16, five days before his death, Dudayev's men destroyed a Russian battalion killing 53 soldiers and prompting emergency hearings in the Russian Duma (parliament). Yet Dudayev led only 5,000 highly-trained men with about 30,000 volunteers against Russia's 400,000 in Chechenya today.

What is most tragic about Dudayev's death is how he was lured by Russian 'negotiators' into a death trap. Following Yeltsin's March 31 announcement of a 'peace plan' and call for direct negotiations with Dudayev, the Chechen leader was begged to attend a Russian satellite phone call for the sake of 'peace'.

As soon as he began the conversation, Dudayev was reportedly killed by a missile fired from the air, guided by emissions from his satellite telephone. The missile attack also obliterated much of Gekhi-Chu village, 35 kms southeast of Grozny.

The technology to pinpoint emissions from satellite phones has been supplied to Russia by the US. Last month British papers carried a small news item confirming this. The west led by the US has not only financed Moscow' s genocidal war by giving it US$10 billion loans through the international monetary fund but is also supplying state of the art technology.

Yet the Chechen struggle for independence will outlive Dudayev. His final words, as he lay in the arms of his bodyguard, were, 'Do not give up the work begun, See it through the end. Allah will grant you victory.'

Such men never die.

[Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, Dudayev's deputy, was immediately sworn in as president.]

Muslimedia - April 1996-August 1996


<<2001 Beslan school siege". U call that a freedom fighter. By the way in that siege about 500 people died, half being kids. Chechens are not freedom fighters, they are terrorists. Even our Bush called them so.<<

Very wide of the mark Sheva.Are you familiar with the word SARCASM?if not so please read your above statement once again with that word in mind..
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Oct 23, 2005 - 07:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1527

Status: Offline
The Chechens have been fighting for independence for 160 years. They have been fighting czars and dictators over a long period.

Does the US government see them as terrorists? I find that hard to understand given Americas fledgling struggle for the same independence. Although the US army never killed school children...There may be other factors involved, bringing Russia closer and less unfriendly to the west. I have heard that big oil companies are hovering too. Some Chechen methods have been dispicable to many. However, when you are struggling for survival, where do you draw the line? Remember, all muslims see the thousands of civilian deaths in Iraq as terrorism.

I`ll say it again, one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACSheva
PostPosted: Oct 23, 2005 - 09:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 25, 2004 - 04:48 AM
Posts: 442

Status: Offline
Duplex, you made Dudaeyv sound like a peacefull man. Who wanted nothing more than peace. We could write the same thing about Musab Al Zarkavi also, if we wanted too. Its clearly a one sided story. It never mentions how many innocent civlians he killed or beheaded. The story makes this Dudayev look like a hero. That man was a terrorist.

Now read this..

Quote:

With the rise of the Dudayev–Maskhadov regime, executions at town squares, decapitations, and attempts to restore law and order on the basis of shariah perturbed both the population of the neighboring Republics and the Chechen people themselves. There is evidence that, in almost eight years of Dudayev– Maskhadov rule, more than 21,000 Russian civilians were murdered and over 46,000 people were forced into slave labor. In 1995–99, as many as 2000 hostages were deported to Chechnya from other Russian regions. Dudayev alone has claimed rights for the gassing of a Chechen hospital in 94, where 56 children died.


Is that a peacefull man Duplex? Dont think so. Rolling Eyes

Anyone can make Bin Laden look like a nice man also, it all depends on who writes it. Im sure u understand. Facts prove otherwise.



Shev Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Oct 24, 2005 - 03:45 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

Driver wrote:
TenguNoHi wrote:
Quote:
The american arrogance was their biggest enemy they were so convinced that they were super powerfull but at the same time all, I repeat all US Mil and intel. organisations said the USAF would be whiped out by the russians in under 7 days.


Sure, its called M-A-D. Mutually Assured Destruction! They could nuke us out in seven days, but they didnt because they knew we'd nuke them out too. Haha, seriously, Americans are a little arrogant, but dont mistake our confidence with arrogance too. We are very aware of what we are capable and not capable of. Remember, only two countries in the world truly understand the impact of an atomic bomb. USA and Japan. Any indescretion during the Cold War to ever use nuclear weapons was from full awareness of the emotional trama following the giving and receiveing of a nuclear weapon.

BTW, I agree with Snypa, this is pretty funny...

-Aaron


Nukes aside lets think about a world with no nukes but the rest is EXACTLY the same, wheter you find it funny or not the russians have always had the upper hand in air power. F-4 Vs Mig-21 Mig-21 was USSR's Best jet and F-4 americas best jet. Mig-21 was better and cheaper and there was a ratio of 2:1 of em. F-16/F-15 vs Mig-29 There were huge amounts of mig-29s and they were suppirrior of the F-16 and F-15 today F-16 Block 52/ F-15C VS Su-27 Su-27 VASTLY suppirior. Su-37MKI V F-22 Su-37 got 3d Thrust vectoring can out turn any EFA F-22 and Rafale any time and is even more manuverable then the Aim-9X The russians also had more and better tanks and WAY more Nukes. The only thing NATO had better were infantrymen. Now im very PRO Nato and i would Love to think NATO was suppirior but you guys are thinking like this, My country can never lose because i live in it and all i hear about is america. trueAmerica And russia would have probably anihalated the entire world with nukes but nukes set asseyed Nato wouldnt stand a chane Check out www.cia.com and you can find a released document from the 70's saying the USAF would be WHIPED out within seven days.


Here is a cold war tip for you ( some of us were there Laughing )

-Potsdam agreement ( people running around with cars on each side of the West German line.

-Massive recon of the whole area.

-NSA and their most excellent British equal.....
+ELINT, COMINT, SIGINT.

The last one is important. Before there could be any fantasy scenario of a Soviet steam roller going through Fulda Gap, there has to be suprise. It takes a lot of time to put an offensive push into reality. Both sides were ready for instant engagement.....not the ability to engage in an extensive offensive in a short amount of time. There would be no suprise if the Reds decided to make a push. The NSA and it's military similars were just that damn good. MUCH of the Soviet com system was compromised..... bad. Good luck on a wet dream fantasy Fulda Gap. Tom Clancy writes books. A few are even entertaining. Laughing

-

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Oct 25, 2005 - 05:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1527

Status: Offline
ELP, as a european, we had the Soviet "threat" rammed down our throats all of our lives. We in Britain were 4 minutes from being toasted by SS-20s etc.. I am sure our US friends were fed the same diet over the cold war period.

Did you guys, the cold war warriors! think you could hold off a Soviet push through europe? We were always told...not for long because we would have been overwhelmed. This was a cool way of keeping mil` spending up as a matter of fact Wink

I know a huge build up couldn`t have been kept secret on the Soviet side. Even without first class ELINT, all it would have taken is one concerned soul in the east on a ham radio to start balling! They were not all communists! So ok, they would never have had surprise. The Soviets may not have chosen to come thru` the Fulda gap. A bit of an obvious strategy. Without going the nuke route, do you think NATO could have beaten them back? I know it`s not just about numbers, it`s about quality of forces. I believe we had just about the best trained forces in the world facing the Soviet ones Smile

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Oct 25, 2005 - 08:14 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

Cold war was run pretty well. MAD was the only reasonable policy. Laughing Well trained and equiped nuke forces kept a lid on things until treaties moving at a snails pace could bring things back down. Re: the SS20s- Funny how the reds put caps on those and stopped deploying them en-masse when GLCM and Pershing II were deployed, and later removed in-kind. All that in spite of the CND scum enemy sympathizer's.

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Oct 25, 2005 - 08:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

An old roommate of mine's dad served in the US Army in the 60's as an artilleryman on a 203mm battery. They were trained on areas in the Fulda Gap and their job was basically to pull the lanyard on an 8" nuke and run like hell if the Soviets invaded. There was no conventional option planned when it came to defending against a full scale Soviet attack.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
The_Mastiff
PostPosted: Oct 25, 2005 - 11:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 05, 2005 - 02:45 PM
Posts: 116
Location: Raleigh NC
Status: Offline
I was in the army in 81 in Germany, in VII corp. We still had M60 tanks, The AF units were just getting the F16's and overall we weren't at all the army that went to war in Desert Storm in 91. Things began changing for the better quickly when Reagan took office, but it took some time. We all knew the Soviets were going to go chemical and probably nuclear on day one on certain targets. The 8" units and the storeage bunkers would have been hit hard before they had a chance to get their specials drawn and issued. Lance units, Air defense sites ( remember they had "specials" too), POMCUS sites ( if you remember those you're old like me), Airfields, etc. We practiced constantly in MOPP4 because we knew the soviets would be hitting everywhere of importance with persistant chemical weapons. All this was found out to be true, and inthe plans when the Berlin wall came down and German/NATO MI went in and ransacked the East German army ops and plans. It would have been one big cluster f^@& for everybody in germany, poland, chech, East Germany, Russia, etc etc. In an escalated war everybody would have gotten a taste of russian nukes, even some neutral countries. They would have wanted no country left in the world more powerfull than themselves ie: they would have taken the whole world with them. JL Raleigh NC
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic