| Author |
Message |
|
Pyth_4
|
 Posted: Apr 28, 2005 - 08:30 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 27, 2005 - 02:23 AM
Posts: 20
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 5:58 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKopack
|
|
Posted: Apr 28, 2005 - 08:45 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
Pyth_4 wrote:
They're impressive!
Granted they look impressive with all of the extra 'pointy bits', but does anyone here have any firsthand knowledge of the Python that can compare / contrast with the current (or future) AIM-9's?
Was told while at the Shaw airshow that the AIM-9X may have an affect on the future of the QF-4 drone program. Apparently they just don't miss.
Mike |
_________________
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepSpace
|
|
Posted: Apr 28, 2005 - 10:17 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
I think that most (if not all) of what could have been said about "AIM-9 Vs. Python *", was already said in these forums (either from limited knowledge or classified information).
Make sure to run a search in the forums for "Python 4" or "Python 5". It may take some time, but I think it's better than repeating all of it all over again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKopack
|
|
Posted: Apr 28, 2005 - 10:20 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
Thanks, sorry about that, I should have checked...
Mike |
_________________
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepSpace
|
|
Posted: Apr 28, 2005 - 10:26 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
No worries mate.
Though if you have further points that weren't being discussed please point them out here  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
