Forum: F-35 Armament, Stores and Tactics

F-22/F-35 AIM-9 target acquisition from the cargo bay



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2004 - 10:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
I was just wondering how the F/A-22 and the F-35 are able to acquire a target using their heat seekers while the "stinger" is in hiding in the cargo hole?

If I were to guess it would be by using a heat seeking sensor on the plane which relays the image to the missile, just like remote desktop connection works for a PC. Anybody have any unclassified info or better educated guess on this?

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 4:44 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
MPJay
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2004 - 12:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 09, 2004 - 04:26 PM
Posts: 26

Status: Offline
The Raptor's side bays open up and cant the Sidewinder outwards, the seeker head is able to aquire the target normally.

The F-35's weapon bays hold AMRAAM's don't they, so that's a moot point there, as they just drop out or are ejected prior to motor ignition, guidance strapdown already loaded.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2004 - 03:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
I can imagine that the AIM-9 seeker head may easily be blocked by the airframe, as I can't imagine that it sticks it that far out from its pocket.

I did see a couple of web pages say that the F-35 will carry AIM-9X only on external hardpoints, so that removes that issue. Being much smaller than the AIM-120 I would have thought that they would have wanted to add a couple internally as well, but there you go...

Can the F-35 carry anything else internally if it has a pair of AIM-120's in the locker?

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2004 - 03:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

Some of those problems could be solved by the new high off bore-sight helmet ( JHMCS ) system also. I am sure they will think of something.

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2004 - 04:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
elp, I can see that the JHMCS will help, but doesn't the the seeker head need to be locked in before l firing? I may be wrong, but my understanding of the JHMCS is that it helps point the missile seeker head and/or the radar/radar beem in the right direction to find the target.

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

I don't know exactly. not being a weaponeer. You have to give some creative thought to the idea when you see those AIM-9X high-off-boresight test shots on video. The missile when it was hanging on the rack didn't see those targets while hanging on the rack either. It launched and based on prelauch info from the JHMCS: it made a hard turn to X=---- Y= ---- Z=----- , and when the missile gets on that heading it aquires ( any ? ) target that is in it's field of view. So IMO, An AIM-9X shot being ejected out of a weapons bay doesn't have to see the target before launch as long as it has the full, complete AIM-9x, JHMCS, setup in place. Thats my non-engineering, non-first person opinion. I could walk over and ask an engineer on the sustainment side here, but that wouldn't be fair. Very Happy

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
atlau
PostPosted: Mar 08, 2005 - 05:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 05:22 AM
Posts: 11

Status: Offline
Any idea why the JSF does not have wingtip mounted rails for the AIM-9? The drawings I saw showed them mounted under the outside part of the wings.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
goatmilk
PostPosted: Mar 08, 2005 - 06:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 12:43 AM
Posts: 190

Status: Offline
My guess is so it won't break up the "stealthy" lines of the jet. Underwing pylons could be easily removed without altering the wing shape or design. That, and it already has the internal bays to carry air-to-air missiles which would be the standard type mounted on wingtip rails. I'm not an engineer though, so that's just my guess as to why they wouldn't put wingtip rails. Smile


Last edited by goatmilk on Mar 08, 2005 - 07:08 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Smithsguy
PostPosted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:04 PM
Posts: 63

Status: Offline
Hi all,

A picture I saw shows wing-tip ARLs for the CTOL and STOVL versions. Only the Carrier Variant had under-wing ARLs perhaps due to the wing-tips folding?

Ciao,
Smithsguy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
goatmilk
PostPosted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 12:43 AM
Posts: 190

Status: Offline
DOH! Doh Well, there goes my theory... Mr. Green
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
atlau
PostPosted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 05:22 AM
Posts: 11

Status: Offline
I guess I should have looked at the drawing more carefully:

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives ... index.html

but it sorta conflicts with this one:

http://content.miw.com.sg/LifeStyle/Mil ... 040802.asp
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Smithsguy
PostPosted: Mar 09, 2005 - 09:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:04 PM
Posts: 63

Status: Offline
Atlau,

Good point. On 2nd thought, as well, I think the CTOL/STOVL Advanced Rail Launcher (ARL) may be mounted under-wing, not wingtip, Though from seeing orientations of components in the ARL at stations 1 and 11 (the outer ones in the first pix), the ARLs may be mounted on an angle - not hanging straight down...

Ciao,
Smithsguy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Apr 19, 2005 - 04:36 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
um read up on how they did this in the OLD days!!! AKA F-106/ F-102/ F-101..... IRST BABY!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
MKopack
PostPosted: Apr 19, 2005 - 05:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
Dust off your 'Scope Wizard' and "Medicine Man' patches... it's the F-35 Voodoo II...

...or maybe not...

Mike

_________________
F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
EriktheF16462
PostPosted: Apr 19, 2005 - 05:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 19, 2004 - 06:24 PM
Posts: 540

Status: Offline
The racks extend when the bay is opened, when employing WVR weapons the RCS is not a issue. Slammers are asleep until the pickle is depressed then they wake up get the info and shoot. On a Viper it takes a bit of time for one to come off the rail.

_________________
F16 462 AD USAF. Crew dog for 3 and Even a pointy head for a few months.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic