| Author |
Message |
|
lamoey
|
Posted: Sep 28, 2004 - 10:41 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
|
I was just wondering how the F/A-22 and the F-35 are able to acquire a target using their heat seekers while the "stinger" is in hiding in the cargo hole?
If I were to guess it would be by using a heat seeking sensor on the plane which relays the image to the missile, just like remote desktop connection works for a PC. Anybody have any unclassified info or better educated guess on this? |
_________________ Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 25, 2013 - 4:44 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MPJay
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2004 - 12:14 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 09, 2004 - 04:26 PM
Posts: 26
Status: Offline
|
The Raptor's side bays open up and cant the Sidewinder outwards, the seeker head is able to aquire the target normally.
The F-35's weapon bays hold AMRAAM's don't they, so that's a moot point there, as they just drop out or are ejected prior to motor ignition, guidance strapdown already loaded. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
lamoey
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2004 - 03:36 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
|
I can imagine that the AIM-9 seeker head may easily be blocked by the airframe, as I can't imagine that it sticks it that far out from its pocket.
I did see a couple of web pages say that the F-35 will carry AIM-9X only on external hardpoints, so that removes that issue. Being much smaller than the AIM-120 I would have thought that they would have wanted to add a couple internally as well, but there you go...
Can the F-35 carry anything else internally if it has a pair of AIM-120's in the locker? |
_________________ Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2004 - 03:27 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147
|
| Some of those problems could be solved by the new high off bore-sight helmet ( JHMCS ) system also. I am sure they will think of something. |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
lamoey
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2004 - 04:19 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
|
| elp, I can see that the JHMCS will help, but doesn't the the seeker head need to be locked in before l firing? I may be wrong, but my understanding of the JHMCS is that it helps point the missile seeker head and/or the radar/radar beem in the right direction to find the target. |
_________________ Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:09 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147
|
I don't know exactly. not being a weaponeer. You have to give some creative thought to the idea when you see those AIM-9X high-off-boresight test shots on video. The missile when it was hanging on the rack didn't see those targets while hanging on the rack either. It launched and based on prelauch info from the JHMCS: it made a hard turn to X=---- Y= ---- Z=----- , and when the missile gets on that heading it aquires ( any ? ) target that is in it's field of view. So IMO, An AIM-9X shot being ejected out of a weapons bay doesn't have to see the target before launch as long as it has the full, complete AIM-9x, JHMCS, setup in place. Thats my non-engineering, non-first person opinion. I could walk over and ask an engineer on the sustainment side here, but that wouldn't be fair.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
atlau
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2005 - 05:33 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 05:22 AM
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
| Any idea why the JSF does not have wingtip mounted rails for the AIM-9? The drawings I saw showed them mounted under the outside part of the wings. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
goatmilk
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2005 - 06:47 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 12:43 AM
Posts: 190
Status: Offline
|
My guess is so it won't break up the "stealthy" lines of the jet. Underwing pylons could be easily removed without altering the wing shape or design. That, and it already has the internal bays to carry air-to-air missiles which would be the standard type mounted on wingtip rails. I'm not an engineer though, so that's just my guess as to why they wouldn't put wingtip rails.  |
Last edited by goatmilk on Mar 08, 2005 - 07:08 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Smithsguy
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:05 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:04 PM
Posts: 63
Status: Offline
|
Hi all,
A picture I saw shows wing-tip ARLs for the CTOL and STOVL versions. Only the Carrier Variant had under-wing ARLs perhaps due to the wing-tips folding?
Ciao,
Smithsguy |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
goatmilk
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:10 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 03, 2005 - 12:43 AM
Posts: 190
Status: Offline
|
DOH! Well, there goes my theory...  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
atlau
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:25 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 05:22 AM
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Smithsguy
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2005 - 09:10 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 08, 2005 - 07:04 PM
Posts: 63
Status: Offline
|
Atlau,
Good point. On 2nd thought, as well, I think the CTOL/STOVL Advanced Rail Launcher (ARL) may be mounted under-wing, not wingtip, Though from seeing orientations of components in the ARL at stations 1 and 11 (the outer ones in the first pix), the ARLs may be mounted on an angle - not hanging straight down...
Ciao,
Smithsguy |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SwedgeII
|
Posted: Apr 19, 2005 - 04:36 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338
Status: Offline
|
| um read up on how they did this in the OLD days!!! AKA F-106/ F-102/ F-101..... IRST BABY!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MKopack
|
Posted: Apr 19, 2005 - 05:16 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
Dust off your 'Scope Wizard' and "Medicine Man' patches... it's the F-35 Voodoo II...
...or maybe not...
Mike |
_________________ F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
 |
|
EriktheF16462
|
Posted: Apr 19, 2005 - 05:56 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Mar 19, 2004 - 06:24 PM
Posts: 540
Status: Offline
|
| The racks extend when the bay is opened, when employing WVR weapons the RCS is not a issue. Slammers are asleep until the pickle is depressed then they wake up get the info and shoot. On a Viper it takes a bit of time for one to come off the rail. |
_________________ F16 462 AD USAF. Crew dog for 3 and Even a pointy head for a few months.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|