| Author |
Message |
|
kubam4a1
|
 Posted: Mar 14, 2005 - 10:07 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 09, 2005 - 02:26 PM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
How do you think which of them is better? Both are the "cheap" fighters produced by USA and USSR for poorer countries. I think F-5 has better radar system while MiG has bigger speed. I also think that they are quite comparable.
What do you think..?
regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 11:39 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spooky
|
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2005 - 03:44 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Nov 21, 2004 - 07:12 AM
Posts: 113
Status: Offline
|
| Have they ever faced each other in combat? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kubam4a1
|
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2005 - 02:26 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 09, 2005 - 02:26 PM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
I think not, but for example F-16A and MiG-29A also haven't ever faced and, we compare them. Both were cheap fighters for poor countries - so they could have fought - but FORTUNATELY they haven't..
Regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KarimAbdoun
|
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2005 - 07:28 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
Have they ever faced each other in combat?
None of the different versions of the F-5 and the MiG-21 face deah other in combat, more info?
there was an issue of AFM that had a 3-page article dedicated to the comparison between both aircraft, I'll check my personal "archives", and of course guess who's better?  |
_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
|
|
|
|
|
|
kubam4a1
|
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2005 - 06:42 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 09, 2005 - 02:26 PM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
| fishbed, I think....is better.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ximeno
|
|
Posted: Mar 17, 2005 - 07:52 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 10, 2005 - 09:09 AM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
|
kubam4a1 wrote:
How do you think which of them is better? Both are the "cheap" fighters produced by USA and USSR for poorer countries. I think F-5 has better radar system while MiG has bigger speed. I also think that they are quite comparable.
What do you think..?
regards,
What do you call cheap? 50 Mill, 100 Mill or 250 Mill (f-22) 
But remember that when we sell a fighter there is also support that goes with it. |
_________________
F-16A,B,C,D in AF
built AV8-b, F-15E, FA-18C/D/E/F/G, T-45.C-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
KarimAbdoun
|
|
Posted: Mar 17, 2005 - 06:11 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
250 Mill (f-22)
The Raptor costs 90 million, its the most expensive fighter the USAF will get |
_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
|
|
|
|
|
|
kubam4a1
|
|
Posted: Mar 18, 2005 - 08:46 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 09, 2005 - 02:26 PM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
What do I mean "CHEAP"? It means: simpler and weaker and cheaper fighter for export
reg., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habu
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2005 - 09:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Oct 21, 2003 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 2738
Status: Offline
|
|
kubam4a1 wrote:
I think not, but for example F-16A and MiG-29A also haven't ever faced and, we compare them.
No, but the F-16C/D and the MiG-29 have met in combat. All engaments won by the F-16 so far. |
_________________
Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
|
|
KarimAbdoun
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2005 - 02:47 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
No, but the F-16C/D and the MiG-29 have met in combat. All engaments won by the F-16 so far.
When exactly? 
For my record |
_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SwedgeII
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2005 - 06:10 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338
Status: Offline
|
| Mig 21 BIS is WAAAAAy better then the F-5... the BIS has a REAL radar!!! heck the F-20 is a better match for the latest Mig 21 BIS.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KarimAbdoun
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2005 - 08:20 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509
Status: Offline
|
| I think, in terms of radar, the F-5 is definitely better. |
_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habu
|
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2005 - 08:59 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Oct 21, 2003 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 2738
Status: Offline
|
|
KarimAbdoun wrote:
Quote:
No, but the F-16C/D and the MiG-29 have met in combat. All engaments won by the F-16 so far.
When exactly?
For my record
Operation Northern/Southern Watch
The Balkans |
_________________
Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
|
|
user12345
|
|
Posted: Feb 11, 2010 - 09:53 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 09, 2010 - 09:10 PM
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
Hi, sorry if this is a repost, folks. I'm new here.
Here's a short clip of a documentary (in Russian) on the Soviet evaluation of ex-VNAF F-5Es on YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGmBdqxr ... re=related
Also, here's more info from another forum, FWIW:
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/sh ... E-Tiger-II
"One F-5 was extensively tested by top gun Soviet pilots from Chkalov's State Flight Tests Center (GLIC - Russian acronym). GLIC was established in the 1920s in the arid delta of the Volga River and its tributary Akhtuba and a local counterpart of US Edwards AFB AFFTC or Tonopah Test Range."
"In air combats with MiG-21, F-5 did show extremely well, surprisingly winning almost of all fights according to reports ..."   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yakuza
|
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2010 - 02:03 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Nov 08, 2008 - 06:17 PM
Posts: 205
Status: Offline
|
cool
long live the Tiger  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
