| Author |
Message |
|
Thermal
|
 Posted: Aug 31, 2012 - 10:31 AM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Aug 31, 2012 - 10:09 AM
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
Hi there,
New here so if my question was already asked; my apologies, could not find it.
Have been wondering for some time why AMRAAM's are always fixed on stations 1 and 9 and the Sidewinders on stations 2 and 8?
Would seem more logical to hang the lighter missile on the most outer stations.
And wasn't it the other way around when the AMRAAM just came in to service?? Or is that my memory playing tricks on me?
Anyone???
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 22, 2013 - 10:02 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
southernphantom
|
|
Posted: Aug 31, 2012 - 04:59 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 745
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
I vaguely remember hearing that it has some structural justification, but I honestly cannot remember what  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnwill
|
|
Posted: Aug 31, 2012 - 06:27 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 09:06 PM
Posts: 1364
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Status: Offline
|
| I believe it is for flutter suppression considerations. The heavier missile with cg forward of wing twist axis, helps to suppress flutter bettsr. Before AMRAAM, the AIM-9 on the tip was better for flutter suppression than a clean tip. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tacf-x
|
|
Posted: Sep 01, 2012 - 04:22 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 431
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
|
| Like johnwill said, it is an improvised aeroelastic feature intended to avoid what's called "flexure-torsion binary flutter" by keeping the CG of the wing forward of the twist axis. AMRAAM is longer and heavier and therefore when loaded it better shifts the CG forward of said axis than, say, a sidewinder. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loader2088
|
|
Posted: Sep 01, 2012 - 07:36 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jul 18, 2007 - 06:43 PM
Posts: 204
Location: Georgia
Status: Offline
|
The real reason is that it's easier for weapons loaders to put the 'winder on Stations 2 and 8. ' ' That sucker's heavy! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiskerwad
|
|
Posted: Sep 02, 2012 - 04:28 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 706
Location: 76101
|
|
Thermal wrote:
Hi there,
New here so if my question was already asked; my apologies, could not find it.
Have been wondering for some time why AMRAAM's are always fixed on stations 1 and 9 and the Sidewinders on stations 2 and 8?
Would seem more logical to hang the lighter missile on the most outer stations.
And wasn't it the other way around when the AMRAAM just came in to service?? Or is that my memory playing tricks on me?
Anyone???
Thanks
You hit the mother lode, Thermal. johnwill, Roscoe, Gums, and outlaw weighed in on this one.
http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-10820.html
fisk |
_________________
Mipple?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siesta
|
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2012 - 08:33 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311
Status: Offline
|
| Don't forget though that during Allied Force and OIF F-16s carried assymetrical loadouts 3XAIM-120 and a single AIM-9 or 4 X AIM1-120s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wacopolumbo
|
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2012 - 10:55 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 23, 2006 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 21
Status: Offline
|
Also, there is a lower Drag Index (DI) with the AIM-120s on the wingtips, believe it or not. Also, if you load 6 air to air missiles, the DI is much lower with the AIM-120s on the outboard stations (1,2,8,9) and the AIM-9s on 3 and 7. Lots of guys with 50 pound brains figuring it out. On a side note, the jet is faster (less drag) with 2 x MK84s vs. 6x MK82s.
Cheers,
Waco |
_________________
20+ years in the USAF, retiring 1 Jun 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
