| Author |
Message |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2012 - 11:55 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8026
Location: OZ
|
When will this tech reach the F-35? Shirley Soon.
DARPA tests breakthrough camera tech 23 August 2012
http://defensetech.org/2012/08/23/darpa ... mera-tech/
"The scientists at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency want to build high powered scopes and cameras for soldiers and Marines up to 2,000 times more powerful than current imaging capabilities....
...Run under the Advanced Wide Field of View Architectures for Image Reconstruction and Exploitation (AWARE) program with Duke University, the recent test used a 1-gigapixel camera made up of 100 micro-cameras.
DARPA leaders want to eventually build a 50-gigapixel camera that would usher in the imaging capabilities that are 2,000 times more powerful than today’s cameras. The next step is to build a 10-gigapixel camera....
....Scientists and engineers understand the camera is no good to soldiers on the ground if it can’t work at night or in bad weather. These super cameras are being built for both.
DARPA officials have said they have seen major breakthroughs with their High Operating Temperature Mid-Wave Infrared (HOT MWIR), which will allow engineers to build more powerful hand held thermal imagers and long-range thermal scopes. The HOT MWIR developments also fall under AWARE...."
http://images.defensetech.org/wp-conten ... 90x495.png
BEST read entire article at URL above - if youse can read this.  |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
38.33 KB |
| Viewed: |
3306 Time(s) |

|
_________________ RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 7:14 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
count_to_10
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:39 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
| Information overload. Just ask the LSST team. |
_________________ Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8026
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 01:39 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 749
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
| I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
count_to_10
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 02:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
count_to_10 wrote:
Information overload. Just ask the LSST team.
http://www.lsst.org/lsst/
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.
The data flow rate is hard to manage. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 03:05 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8026
Location: OZ
|
| So what. We can imagine a possible future use where a lot of issues today have been overcome. Better computers are on the way also that don't require specific accuracy for calculation; but likely will be good enough for some specific purposes (as above). I'll post an URL to this new computer paradigm info if it can be found again. A possible future is what is the topic here NOT how bad the present day issues may be. |
_________________ RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 07:10 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1163
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
|
This passive technology can help us to identify the component weaknesses in the equipment fielded against us for our EW attacks. SEAD/ DEAD tactics are more effective with more precise/ accurate data acquisition. EO DAS merges will see a few generations of evolutions. 50 gigapixel will be a good start.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:45 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2089
Status: Offline
|
|
southernphantom wrote:
I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes.
The AESA radar can support broadband transmission speeds so maybe that's one possibility? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 01:18 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2089
Status: Offline
|
|
southernphantom wrote:
I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes.
The AESA radar can support broadband transmission speeds so maybe that's one possibility? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
count_to_10
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2012 - 11:51 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
So what. We can imagine a possible future use where a lot of issues today have been overcome. Better computers are on the way also that don't require specific accuracy for calculation; but likely will be good enough for some specific purposes (as above). I'll post an URL to this new computer paradigm info if it can be found again. A possible future is what is the topic here NOT how bad the present day issues may be.
I didn't mean anything by it other than that data transmission rates will a limiting factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|