| Author |
Message |
|
aw2007
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 12:18 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 30, 2008 - 10:06 PM
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
| According to an article I read in Aviation Week a couple of years ago, the Max supercruise speed is M 1.82 and normal supercruise speed is M 1.5, both take place above 50000 ft. Given the current altitude restriction of 44000 ft, which hopefully will be lifted when the valve of the anti-G vest is replaced by the end of the year; Does anyone know how much, if any, effect the restriction might have on the plane's ability to supercruise? Please note that I'm not soliciting, nor am I expecting any classified info on this subject. Just looking to learn something out of meaningful discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 25, 2013 - 1:13 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Atle
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 12:35 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 11, 2008 - 02:04 PM
Posts: 37
Status: Offline
|
|
aw2007 wrote:
According to an article I read in Aviation Week a couple of years ago, the Max supercruise speed is M 1.82 and normal supercruise speed is M 1.5, both take place above 50000 ft. Given the current altitude restriction of 44000 ft, which hopefully will be lifted when the valve of the anti-G vest is replaced by the end of the year; Does anyone know how much, if any, effect the restriction might have on the plane's ability to supercruise? Please note that I'm not soliciting, nor am I expecting any classified info on this subject. Just looking to learn something out of meaningful discussion.
Either that article was incorrect or you remember it wrong. The F-22 can supercruise at M1.82 and reach an altitude of over 50,000 ft, but not at the same time. Actually, best supercruise performance is supposedly at 35,000 ft. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
fiskerwad
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 01:50 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 708
Location: 76101
|
|
Atle wrote:
aw2007 wrote:
According to an article I read in Aviation Week a couple of years ago, the Max supercruise speed is M 1.82 and normal supercruise speed is M 1.5, both take place above 50000 ft. Given the current altitude restriction of 44000 ft, which hopefully will be lifted when the valve of the anti-G vest is replaced by the end of the year; Does anyone know how much, if any, effect the restriction might have on the plane's ability to supercruise? Please note that I'm not soliciting, nor am I expecting any classified info on this subject. Just looking to learn something out of meaningful discussion.
Either that article was incorrect or you remember it wrong. The F-22 can supercruise at M1.82 and reach an altitude of over 50,000 ft, but not at the same time. Actually, best supercruise performance is supposedly at 35,000 ft.
The article was probably this one:
Aviation Week (Feb 8/09) – F-22 Design Shows More Than Expected. Desired radar signature from certain critical angles is -40 dBsm., supercruise at Mach 1.78 rather than Mach 1.5, better acceleration, operation from about 65,000 feet using afterburner, 5% greater range from its APG-77 AESA radar.
fisk |
_________________ Mipple?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aw2007
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 02:09 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 30, 2008 - 10:06 PM
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
|
fiskerwad wrote:
Atle wrote:
aw2007 wrote:
According to an article I read in Aviation Week a couple of years ago, the Max supercruise speed is M 1.82 and normal supercruise speed is M 1.5, both take place above 50000 ft. Given the current altitude restriction of 44000 ft, which hopefully will be lifted when the valve of the anti-G vest is replaced by the end of the year; Does anyone know how much, if any, effect the restriction might have on the plane's ability to supercruise? Please note that I'm not soliciting, nor am I expecting any classified info on this subject. Just looking to learn something out of meaningful discussion.
Either that article was incorrect or you remember it wrong. The F-22 can supercruise at M1.82 and reach an altitude of over 50,000 ft, but not at the same time. Actually, best supercruise performance is supposedly at 35,000 ft.
The article was probably this one:
Aviation Week (Feb 8/09) – F-22 Design Shows More Than Expected. Desired radar signature from certain critical angles is -40 dBsm., supercruise at Mach 1.78 rather than Mach 1.5, better acceleration, operation from about 65,000 feet using afterburner, 5% greater range from its APG-77 AESA radar.
fisk
Yes, Fisk, that is the article I was referring to. Atle: Interesting. May I ask where you got your info from? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Atle
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 03:25 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 11, 2008 - 02:04 PM
Posts: 37
Status: Offline
|
|
aw2007 wrote:
fiskerwad wrote:
The article was probably this one:
Aviation Week (Feb 8/09) – F-22 Design Shows More Than Expected. Desired radar signature from certain critical angles is -40 dBsm., supercruise at Mach 1.78 rather than Mach 1.5, better acceleration, operation from about 65,000 feet using afterburner, 5% greater range from its APG-77 AESA radar.
fisk
Yes, Fisk, that is the article I was referring to. Atle: Interesting. May I ask where you got your info from?
You do realise that the quote contradicts your original statement?
My data is from the US Airforce:
As for the original question, no, the altitude restrictions has not impaired the supercruise capability of the F-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 04:20 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
| The F-22 can supercruise at a wide variety of altitudes, including at extreme high altitudes. The speed may change slightly, due to the effects of altitude on Mach numbers. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 05:01 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613
Status: Offline
|
|
Atle wrote:
aw2007 wrote:
According to an article I read in Aviation Week a couple of years ago, the Max supercruise speed is M 1.82 and normal supercruise speed is M 1.5, both take place above 50000 ft. Given the current altitude restriction of 44000 ft, which hopefully will be lifted when the valve of the anti-G vest is replaced by the end of the year; Does anyone know how much, if any, effect the restriction might have on the plane's ability to supercruise? Please note that I'm not soliciting, nor am I expecting any classified info on this subject. Just looking to learn something out of meaningful discussion.
Either that article was incorrect or you remember it wrong. The F-22 can supercruise at M1.82 and reach an altitude of over 50,000 ft, but not at the same time. Actually, best supercruise performance is supposedly at 35,000 ft.
Where'd you hear that? Smells like BS. There's at least one account out there of a pilot talking about supercruising at Mach 1.9 at 60,000ft+. Designing it for supercruising at 60,000ft would be totally pointless if it required AB to do it. As for that graph, the DoD almost always SEVERLY understates things in "official" documents. For example the Seawolf SSN is listed as max speed of 25 knots and max depth of 800 ft. |
_________________ "There I was. . ."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Atle
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 07:44 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 11, 2008 - 02:04 PM
Posts: 37
Status: Offline
|
|
sferrin wrote:
Where'd you hear that? Smells like BS. There's at least one account out there of a pilot talking about supercruising at Mach 1.9 at 60,000ft+. Designing it for supercruising at 60,000ft would be totally pointless if it required AB to do it. As for that graph, the DoD almost always SEVERLY understates things in "official" documents. For example the Seawolf SSN is listed as max speed of 25 knots and max depth of 800 ft.
It comes from Major General Charles R Davis, USAF, at an official presentation.
http://www.florida-edc.org/getmedia/bfa ... ept08.aspx |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 08:21 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 547
Status: Offline
|
|
sferrin wrote:
For example the Seawolf SSN is listed as max speed of 25 knots and max depth of 800 ft.
Haha, I love it whenever I read press reports that state submarines can dive to 800ft, it's like saying a Ferrari can reach 60mph. |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 08:36 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
Atle wrote:
It comes from Major General Charles R Davis, USAF, at an official presentation.
http://www.florida-edc.org/getmedia/bfa ... ept08.aspx
That's a pretty vanilla presentation. You're not going to see an unclassified presentation, with the full flight envelope of the F-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2012 - 08:36 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
PhillyGuy wrote:
sferrin wrote:
For example the Seawolf SSN is listed as max speed of 25 knots and max depth of 800 ft.
Haha, I love it whenever I read press reports that state submarines can dive to 800ft, it's like saying a Ferrari can reach 60mph.
And that's just in first gear.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
fiskerwad
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2012 - 12:03 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 708
Location: 76101
|
|
wrightwing wrote:
Atle wrote:
It comes from Major General Charles R Davis, USAF, at an official presentation.
http://www.florida-edc.org/getmedia/bfa ... ept08.aspx
That's a pretty vanilla presentation. You're not going to see an unclassified presentation, with the full flight envelope of the F-22.
What did I miss? The presentation was F-35 to a business group? Where was the F-22 data?
fisk |
_________________ Mipple?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2012 - 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| Page 14 |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
fiskerwad
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2012 - 07:23 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 708
Location: 76101
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
Page 14
Thanks, I guess the numbers quoted were just extracted from the graph?
Shaky.
fisk |
_________________ Mipple?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2012 - 07:58 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| Looks that way. |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|