| Author |
Message |
|
southernphantom
|
 Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 04:54 AM
|
 
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
count_to_10 wrote:
southernphantom wrote:
Survivability. The OV-10 just doesn't have it. Its losses in Desert Storm weren't good at all. Its payload is also deficient relative to the Warthog, as is its kinematic performance (the Bronco was notoriously underpowered.
Most of that could probably have been fixed by upgrading the engines, extending the wings, and adding armor. Actually, it looks like Boeing plans on upgrading it to modern technology.
You're quite right on the OV-10X. However, even I admit that airframe upgrades only go so far. You reach a point where you just need to give up and design something new. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 26, 2013 - 2:35 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
darkvarkguy
|
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 05:09 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
|
| [quote="southernphantom"][quote="count_to_10"]
southernphantom wrote:
However, even I admit that airframe upgrades only go so far. You reach a point where you just need to give up and design something new.
Explain that to the B-52  |
_________________
FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
|
|
|
|
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 05:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Location: Phoenix, Az
Status: Offline
|
| which survived past many of its replacements. |
_________________
James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spooky
|
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 05:41 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Nov 21, 2004 - 07:12 AM
Posts: 113
Status: Offline
|
|
count_to_10 wrote:
southernphantom wrote:
Survivability. The OV-10 just doesn't have it. Its losses in Desert Storm weren't good at all. Its payload is also deficient relative to the Warthog, as is its kinematic performance (the Bronco was notoriously underpowered.
Most of that could probably have been fixed by upgrading the engines, extending the wings, and adding armor. Actually, it looks like Boeing plans on upgrading it to modern technology.
A-10 has the 30mm gun. OV-10 never will. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 06:08 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4279
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
It could, just not the GAU-8.
If it ever got a 30mm, it would be the same gun M230 as on the Apache  |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2012 - 11:54 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1332
Status: Offline
|
| I really don't know about whether it could take the GAU-8 or not (It seems to have plenty of room), but at least it wouldn't have had the A-10's flame-out problem from the gun's propellant gasses. |
_________________
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FlightDreamz
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 01:42 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
awsome
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 09:10 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 17, 2008 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 63
Location: vancouver
Status: Offline
|
| A-10s tested the new scorpion helmet system in a maritime environment at RIMPAC 2012 in Hawaii. I wonder if they just do cas for the Marines or if they also have an antship role? |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
1.21 MB |
| Viewed: |
13484 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
southernphantom
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 09:21 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
It could, just not the GAU-8.
If it ever got a 30mm, it would be the same gun M230 as on the Apache
If I remember correctly, the M230 has a lower RoF and muzzle velocity. It's good at killing soft targets, but will struggle against armor (at least compared to the GAU- . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 10:59 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4279
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
The M230 has a HEAT-type warhead (velocity is irrelevant to penetration) and the GAU-8 uses a DU combined with high velocity for penetration.
Apples and Oranges |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 11:03 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1332
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
The M230 has a HEAT-type warhead (velocity is irrelevant to penetration) and the GAU-8 uses a DU combined with high velocity for penetration.
Apples and Oranges
Velocity isn't irrelevant for HEAT warheads.
They don't work at all if they are traveling too fast relative to the target. |
Last edited by count_to_10 on Aug 04, 2012 - 11:34 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2012 - 11:16 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4279
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| Well, that's not going to ever be an issue for the M230 . |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spooky
|
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2012 - 02:25 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Nov 21, 2004 - 07:12 AM
Posts: 113
Status: Offline
|
| Doesnt the gun with the higher velocity have longer range? I would think that would help give a fast moving aircraft (compared to a chopper) a better chance at aiming at their target. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
madrat
|
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2012 - 03:49 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986
Status: Offline
|
| The M230 has a lot more vibration, considering the whole assembly moves to recoil and shakes the aircraft using a long moment arm. The GAU-8 steadies itself directly against the superstructure and the movement of the multiple barrels actually stabilizes the aircraft. You're better off not mounting the M230 on your OV-10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2012 - 03:53 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4279
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Considering the M230 can be tripod mounted & the OV-10 can mount a 20mm Gatling, I consider the M230 on the OV-10 a no brainer.
Consider this, how nasty would this be in a belly turret with laser-guided rounds (in the testing stage) from an orbiting OV-10? |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
