Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

First increment 3.1 ac delivered



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
popcorn
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2012 - 10:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2034

Status: Offline
SpudmanWP wrote:
For F-22?

IIRC it was pushed to the rights as the F-35 that it would communicate with were also pushed to the right. No need to upgrade an F-22 to talk to an F-35 that will not be flying yet. Also, MADL has not finished dev so again, not ready for install yet.

FY2013 budget docs make no mention of MADL for the F-22.


I was unaware MADL had been moved back on the F-35 .. makes sense to put it on the backburner for the Raptor.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 6:38 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2012 - 04:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4272
Location: California
Status: Offline
It was not moved back, per se, on the F-35. The whole F-35 SDD program was restructured so instead of completing in 2013, it now completes in 2016. With this, the time and money being spend to develop/integrate/test MADL was also pushed to the right.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
munny
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2012 - 12:11 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 13, 2010 - 01:39 AM
Posts: 529

Status: Offline
wrightwing wrote:
I believe the APG-77(v)1 already has different T/R modules, as well as upgraded backend components. I'm sure over it's career, there'll be significant upgrades just like the APG-63 had.


I read recently that Raytheon has been given a contract to start producing GaN based TR modules. Will be interesting to see how it develops, but apparently the potential power output of GaN modules is 10x that of the current GaAs components.

You'd expect more cooling will be required, but radar output could increase significantly in the near future.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
f22spec
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2012 - 10:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2012 - 10:52 PM
Posts: 19

Status: Offline
115 has had 3.1 on it for quite a few months now.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
wrightwing
PostPosted: Mar 26, 2012 - 03:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2022

Status: Offline
munny wrote:
I read recently that Raytheon has been given a contract to start producing GaN based TR modules. Will be interesting to see how it develops, but apparently the potential power output of GaN modules is 10x that of the current GaAs components.

You'd expect more cooling will be required, but radar output could increase significantly in the near future.


In terms of radar output, there have been allusions to the range increasing to >250nm. That remains to be seen, but at least it points towards significant upgrades in capability.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
fat_cat
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2012 - 10:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 26, 2012 - 05:49 PM
Posts: 57
Location: UK
Status: Offline
A few more interesting bits on the upgrade in this article

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... rs-370192/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
jbash
PostPosted: Sep 05, 2012 - 11:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 25, 2012 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 15

Status: Offline
Operational F-22s with increment 3.1 drop SDBs at Combat Hammer

http://defense-update.com/20120817_oper ... -time.html
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
PhillyGuy
PostPosted: Sep 06, 2012 - 04:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 547

Status: Offline
I read somewhere that Raytheon hasn't delivered new AMRAAMS to the force in something like a year or two because they are having issues with the rocket motor/fuel in some of their newer models. I don't know if this is true? Apparently it has affected the AIM-120D schedule/integration.

_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Sep 06, 2012 - 04:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4272
Location: California
Status: Offline
yes, the same motor that is in the C7 is also in the D.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
pants3204
PostPosted: Sep 06, 2012 - 05:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 15, 2012 - 04:42 AM
Posts: 116
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
PhillyGuy wrote:
I read somewhere that Raytheon hasn't delivered new AMRAAMS to the force in something like a year or two because they are having issues with the rocket motor/fuel in some of their newer models. I don't know if this is true? Apparently it has affected the AIM-120D schedule/integration.


This?

Janes wrote:
The motors, supplied by ATK, have suffered mass failures when subjected to routine cold temperature tests. The issue has surprised and baffled ATK and Raytheon because the formulation and materials used to produce the rocket propellant fill have not changed – and have been in production, without incident, for more than 30 years. However, by late 2009 reliability problems had emerged with the ATK motors and now Raytheon says it has a stock of around 800 missiles that cannot be delivered. The US Depertment of Defense (DoD) has suspended payments to Raytheon until the rocket issues are solved and Raytheon admits that a final, reliable solution has yet to be found.


http://www.janes.com/products/janes/def ... 1065969816
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Sep 06, 2012 - 06:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986

Status: Offline
I wouldn't put it past an inert component left over during production of an ingredient has changed. It happens with consumer products all the time when suppliers refine their products and manufacturers are caught unaware of minor changes.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
PhillyGuy
PostPosted: Sep 07, 2012 - 06:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 547

Status: Offline
pants3204 wrote:

This?


Yes. It was quite shocking, both the severity of the problem and the duration of it. Hopefully our current stockpiles suffice for some time to come.

_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic