Forum: Program and politics

Canada convenes international meeting over troubled F-35



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
maus92
PostPosted: Feb 14, 2012 - 01:19 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1189
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
"WASHINGTON - Washington's plan to further slow production of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is prompting Canada to convene a meeting with seven other international partners as the countries rethink their own orders for the stealthy new fighter jet."

"Canada has tentatively scheduled a meeting of the partners at its embassy in Washington before the Australian meeting to get an update on the program and better coordinate their approach."

``The situation is increasingly becoming a fiasco. People are pulling out, pulling back . . . reassessing what they're going to do," NDP MP Matthew Kellway told Reuters on Friday.

He said the Pentagon had given Canada every reason to step back, by stepping back itself."

The article goes into each partner's buying situation.

Read more: http://www.canada.com/Canada+convenes+i ... z1mJIaWGu2
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 2:42 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Vipernice
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 03:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jun 04, 2007 - 10:06 PM
Posts: 74

Status: Offline
Canada Appears to Waver on F-35 Purchase
Feb. 14, 2012 - 07:25PM |
By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper opened the door Feb. 14 for a possible cut in the number of F-35 fighter jets Canada will buy, after reports that the United States was scaling back its purchase plans.


http://www.defensenews.com/article/2012 ... y=nav|head
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
hotrampphotography
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 04:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 10, 2011 - 04:26 PM
Posts: 58
Location: YYZ
Status: Offline
LMAO...we buy them, we're spending too much, but if we cut the number purchased to ensure we don't pay more we're wavering??

I'm glad I wasn't drinking a beer when I read that...lol

_________________
A freelance journalist with a focus on the three branches of the Canadian Forces.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 06:29 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
Pretty sure the meeting will go like this.

"Ok everybody, the F-35 is overbudget and behind schedule, but we all want 5th generation fighters to start replacing our current fleets within the next 10 years." What are our options?"

...

...

"Anybody? Anything to say? Ok, let's all go home."

_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 01:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
Is a figure known, scenario how many F35’s could be ordered by Canada, in case a higher price with a same budget?


In 2002 was written in a Dutch letter to Parliament, before joining the JSF project, possible F35’s.
Estimated with a fl.10 billion = €4.537 billion budget (tentative budget at that time): 1998
- Rate: fl.1 = €2.20371 (2002)

A. 120 F35’s (not realistic scenario)
B. 85 F35’s (estimated possible scenario)
C. 60 F35’s (worst case scenario)

85 F35’s, a middle of the road estimation, but would the price go up, without raising the budget,
60 F35’s (more expensive than calculated, option C).
o The used mid rate at that time: $1 = €1.15
o Used mid rate (2011): $1 = €0.83
o Rate febr. 2012: $1 = €0,76

In this letter (2002): The needed budget, as well as how many F35’s, would be a responsibility for the government ordering the F35.


Investment SSD phase: Netherlands (2002):
- US $800 billion > at rate at that time: €857.5 billion
- In, at rate febr, 14, 2012: US €1.152 billion ($1 = €0.76)

Production Phase: Some €355 million

IOT&E Phase: €270 million

Total investments:
Plus some other costs: +€1783 billion = US $2.23 billion (rate: febr. 14, 2012)

* Extra investment updating F16, flying three longer (2027): €300 million
As seen as an investment (sunk costs) as well, this could be counted as: €1783 + €300 million = €2,083 billion (US $2.74 billion, rate febr . 2012)


€4.5 billion:
The €4.5 billion, mentioned last year, as put a side for ordering the F35, by the Dutch government, is the original budget (2002).
As well as, nationally and internationally has been mentioned, the budget has been lowered, is actually not really the case. This government simply has no authority to raise the budget for ordering the F35.

In 2006 the tentative budget changed in, what budget would be needed for ordering 85 F35’s?

Last year estimated was, €7.6 billion = $9.15 billion would be needed for 85 F35’s (mid rate: $1 = €0.83). At rate 0.76, febr 2012: €6.95 billion = $9.15 bilion.

Either what the budget will be (more than the original budget €4.5 billion) and how many F35’s, is and would be the responsibility for the next government (probably 2015?)


Seems rougly there is some comparison with Canada and Norway:
o Netherlands: some $6 billion - $9 billion
o Canada: $8.5 or $9 billion
o Norway: $10 billion (?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 02:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
Personal point of view, houses raised in price during these years: 3 or 4x. Wages more than doubled and etc.
Compared, does the F35 really became that expensive as it seems?
As well compared with the raise of the prices of a Rafale and a Typhoon.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
luke_sandoz
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 06:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Feb 08, 2011 - 08:25 PM
Posts: 164

Status: Offline
The Canadian Prime Minster has ignored the national parliamentary press corps and treats them like ignorant fools and turdheads.

They don't like being dissed and have a true hate on for Harper, his government and anything they do. They smell blood in the water and have been piling on the vindictive anti F-35 stories over the last few days.

They have no idea how foolish they look with all the fear mongering, presenting speculations as facts and proving once again, that journalists are math challenged.

True members of the Aviation Ignoranti club.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
hb_pencil
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 10:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 541

Status: Offline
luke_sandoz wrote:
The Canadian Prime Minster has ignored the national parliamentary press corps and treats them like ignorant fools and turdheads.

They don't like being dissed and have a true hate on for Harper, his government and anything they do. They smell blood in the water and have been piling on the vindictive anti F-35 stories over the last few days.

They have no idea how foolish they look with all the fear mongering, presenting speculations as facts and proving once again, that journalists are math challenged.

True members of the Aviation Ignoranti club.


Actually I think its partly a problem of the government's own making. The diminution of the public affairs apparatus doesn't help them at all. the messaging coming out of the government is simplistic and doesn't really help to convince other parties.

Furthermore there is an dearth of public expertise in procurement. The PBO's report is still being cited when its basically been discredited by National Defence.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
alloycowboy
PostPosted: Feb 15, 2012 - 11:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 611
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
I think everyone is jumping the gun here. Details are vargue regarding the F-35 because it is only about 20% through flight test. Once it hits the 75-80% flight test competition mark then you it will be possible to nail down cost and quanity.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
flighthawk128
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 02:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 24, 2011 - 11:25 PM
Posts: 49

Status: Offline
Hey Hey Hey!!! People!!! Read the news. I'd rather have a ton of Super Hornets + Reaper or even Predator drones than only a few F-35's. And from the initial budget estimate available for F-35's, the most realistic number is 40 units. OUCH!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
hb_pencil
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 03:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 541

Status: Offline
flighthawk128 wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!!! People!!! Read the news. I'd rather have a ton of Super Hornets + Reaper or even Predator drones than only a few F-35's. And from the initial budget estimate available for F-35's, the most realistic number is 40 units. OUCH!!!


Please post information to support this.


This should be interesting.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 03:49 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
hb_pencil wrote:
flighthawk128 wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!!! People!!! Read the news. I'd rather have a ton of Super Hornets + Reaper or even Predator drones than only a few F-35's. And from the initial budget estimate available for F-35's, the most realistic number is 40 units. OUCH!!!


Please post information to support this.


This should be interesting.


He has something of a point though. With prices likely to go up, if Canada is unwilling to part with the extra cash necessary to keep their order at 65 (a piddling number anyways), then I see little point in them buying the F-35 at all.

_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
hb_pencil
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 04:06 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 541

Status: Offline
1st503rdsgt wrote:
hb_pencil wrote:
flighthawk128 wrote:
Hey Hey Hey!!! People!!! Read the news. I'd rather have a ton of Super Hornets + Reaper or even Predator drones than only a few F-35's. And from the initial budget estimate available for F-35's, the most realistic number is 40 units. OUCH!!!


Please post information to support this.


This should be interesting.


He has something of a point though. With prices likely to go up, if Canada is unwilling to part with the extra cash necessary to keep their order at 65 (a piddling number anyways), then I see little point in them buying the F-35 at all.


What's to say that the government isn't willing to pony up more money, which its done for alot of other aircraft. Since it doesn't seem like you're actually familiar with the Canada at all. Look at the Cyclone program; 230 million overbudget, no helicopters delivered and the government is still committed.

Furthermore I'm fairly confident the government will buy at least a dozen more aircraft in future years. That's also the advantage of being a partner in the program rather than an FMS customer.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 04:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4274
Location: California
Status: Offline
Canada already had a buffer for extra costs built into its plans. Besides, LM & the JPO could always guarantee FRP prices to late LRIP Partner buys in order to keep them in the LRIP cycle.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 16, 2012 - 10:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
SpudmanWP wrote:
Canada already had a buffer for extra costs built into its plans. Besides, LM & the JPO could always guarantee FRP prices to late LRIP Partner buys in order to keep them in the LRIP cycle.


SpudmanWP. Do yo can explain this a bit. have got no understanding of this how this works?
Quote: LM & the JPO could always guarantee FRP prices to late LRIP Partner buys in order to keep them in the LRIP cycle

As you will now, the Dutch postponed ordering the F35. In a letter of the min of Defense: when the F35 will be ordered, delivery in 2020, 10 F35`s, last LRIP series.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic