| Author |
Message |
|
maus92
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 07:01 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1209
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 - 1:47 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 09:24 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8035
Location: OZ
|
Some more USAF Budget info here:
Spending on aircraft to dip 12 percent in 2013 By Dave Majumdar Feb 12, 2012
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2012/ ... p-021212w/
"...The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program for the Air Force, Navy and Marines is slowing down its ramp-up to full rate production to reduce concurrency. Procurement would drop by two jets to 29 aircraft: 19 of those jets are to be Air Force F-35A model jets, four are to be Navy carrier-based F-35Cs, six are to the Marine F-35B jump jet variant.
The planes are being bought for $6.1 billion, and the Pentagon would spend $2.7 billion on development work...." |
_________________ RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
luke_sandoz
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2012 - 12:59 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 08, 2011 - 08:25 PM
Posts: 167
Status: Offline
|
|
hotrampphotography wrote:
I still like the idea of a split fleet for the RCAF consisting of F-35's and Super Hornets. They would complement each other well.
Two aircraft types.
Two maintenance trains.
Two training programs.
Two support programs.
More money spent on logistics. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hb_pencil
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2012 - 01:59 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 553
Status: Offline
|
|
luke_sandoz wrote:
hotrampphotography wrote:
I still like the idea of a split fleet for the RCAF consisting of F-35's and Super Hornets. They would complement each other well.
Two aircraft types.
Two maintenance trains.
Two training programs.
Two support programs.
More money spent on logistics.
Also I'm not sure whether they would be that great a compliment for Canada's defense needs. Shorter range, inferior sensors and (likely) higher operating costs... it doesn't help any domestic requirement. Given that everybody is going to the F-35, its less advantageous in that realm. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Feb 23, 2012 - 12:31 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8035
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
maus92
|
Posted: Feb 23, 2012 - 07:29 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1209
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
|
Turkey's F-35 Decision Driven by Technology Transfer Concerns
BY FRANCESCO F. MILAN | 23 FEB 2012 | World Politics Review
"On Jan. 5, Turkey’s Defense Industry Executive Committee, chaired by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, authorized the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries to open negotiations with Lockheed Martin for the purchase of two F-35 multi-role combat fighters by 2015. Though Turkey's defense minister today clarified that Turkey still intends to follow through with its intention to acquire 100 F-35s, the small initial purchase represents yet another setback for the troubled program."
"...Ankara’s decision to move slowly on its F-35 purchase is not just driven by the project’s technical problems.* It also has to do with the United States’ uneasiness in sharing technology with Turkey, a problem dating back to the 1980s, when Turkey purchased its first F-16s."
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/arti ... r-concerns |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|