Forum: Program and politics

F-35 orders



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
g3143
PostPosted: Feb 10, 2012 - 04:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 17, 2010 - 01:16 AM
Posts: 124
Location: New York
Status: Offline
How many f-35's are currently planned to be bought by current and future countries?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2013 - 2:01 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
hotrampphotography
PostPosted: Feb 10, 2012 - 04:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 10, 2011 - 04:26 PM
Posts: 58
Location: YYZ
Status: Offline
http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... rt-15.html

_________________
A freelance journalist with a focus on the three branches of the Canadian Forces.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
joost
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 08:49 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 22, 2010 - 11:11 AM
Posts: 86
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
It's hard to tell for future countries, they need to be founded first Smile
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 10:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
Some are interested in:
- Singapore (associated partner): 100?
- S. Korea (decision oct.): 60

- Finland
- Greece (doubt possible for the Greece at the moment)


* Spain? Hardly no other possibility than the F35B, or stick to the Harrier
* Belgium? Although their min. Defence favours the F35, another jet type is not on the political agenda
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
joost
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 02:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 22, 2010 - 11:11 AM
Posts: 86
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
It was the language, M. Those countries are not future countries, but countries with a possible future interest. A "future" country is a country that does not exist yet...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
duplex
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 02:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 14, 2005 - 05:30 PM
Posts: 342

Status: Offline
joost wrote:
It was the language, M. Those countries are not future countries, but countries with a possible future interest. A "future" country is a country that does not exist yet...



And under these circumstances,there won't be any future for this ill-fated program.Its time the partners leave the program and buy something else .

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/U-S-F-35- ... 3.html?x=0
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
flighthawk
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 03:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 10, 2007 - 08:06 PM
Posts: 372

Status: Offline
duplex wrote:


And under these circumstances,there won't be any future for this ill-fated program.Its time the partners leave the program and buy something else .



- then they will all buy the totally obsolete Rafale yes

Suggest you keep dreaming...........
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 04:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
joost wrote:
It was the language, M. Those countries are not future countries, but countries with a possible future interest. A "future" country is a country that does not exist yet...


Yep! Cool Laughing Laughing
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 04:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
duplex wrote:
joost wrote:
It was the language, M. Those countries are not future countries, but countries with a possible future interest. A "future" country is a country that does not exist yet...



And under these circumstances,there won't be any future for this ill-fated program.Its time the partners leave the program and buy something else .

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/U-S-F-35- ... 3.html?x=0


One who survives hard times, becomes a stronger man as well Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
hotrampphotography
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 04:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 10, 2011 - 04:26 PM
Posts: 58
Location: YYZ
Status: Offline
I still like the idea of a split fleet for the RCAF consisting of F-35's and Super Hornets. They would complement each other well.

_________________
A freelance journalist with a focus on the three branches of the Canadian Forces.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
g3143
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 04:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 17, 2010 - 01:16 AM
Posts: 124
Location: New York
Status: Offline
The U.S. plane to buy 2,443 units with about 1,763 F-35A for the air force, 340 F-35B and 80 F-35C for the marines, and 260 F-35C for the navy. Lets see if everyone gets what they want.

For comparison how many F-16's was the U.S. planning to buy from the start?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
joost
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 05:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 22, 2010 - 11:11 AM
Posts: 86
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
duplex wrote:
And under these circumstances,there won't be any future for this ill-fated program.Its time the partners leave the program and buy something else .

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/U-S-F-35- ... 3.html?x=0


You seem to be the perfect victim to make a bet with, I like certain wins Cool

Yeah right, in your world, under these circumstances, the partners will all think: let's buy this 54 months late overpriced fighter instead of the JSF! Or this overpriced fighter which no one wants to buy! Keep on dreaming.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
maus92
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 06:45 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1190
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
g3143 wrote:
The U.S. plane to buy 2,443 units with about 1,763 F-35A for the air force, 340 F-35B and 80 F-35C for the marines, and 260 F-35C for the navy. Lets see if everyone gets what they want.

For comparison how many F-16's was the U.S. planning to buy from the start?


Those are pretty definitive numbers for the F-35B and -C. Where did you get them?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
g3143
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 07:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 17, 2010 - 01:16 AM
Posts: 124
Location: New York
Status: Offline
maus92 wrote:
g3143 wrote:
The U.S. plane to buy 2,443 units with about 1,763 F-35A for the air force, 340 F-35B and 80 F-35C for the marines, and 260 F-35C for the navy. Lets see if everyone gets what they want.

For comparison how many F-16's was the U.S. planning to buy from the start?


Those are pretty definitive numbers for the F-35B and -C. Where did you get them?


I got it from:
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63158
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
flighthawk
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 08:29 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 10, 2007 - 08:06 PM
Posts: 372

Status: Offline
g3143 wrote:
The U.S. plane to buy 2,443 units with about 1,763 F-35A for the air force, 340 F-35B and 80 F-35C for the marines, and 260 F-35C for the navy. Lets see if everyone gets what they want.

For comparison how many F-16's was the U.S. planning to buy from the start?


From this very site

Early 1975, the USAF announced it would buy 650 F-16 multi-role fighters. The timing of this announcement was not coincidental, as the four European nations that were considering the F-16 as a replacement for their F-104 Starfighters wanted a firm commitment from the USAF before making their decision. At the same time, the USAF announced that the order could be extended to include as many as 1,400 F-16s.

In August 1975, General Dynamics' Fort Worth plant began producing the F-16, after a major overhaul of the plants production facilities. The production F-16A differed from the YF-16 in having a 13-inch fuselage extension to accommodate more fuel and the Westinghouse APG-66 radar. The wing area was increased by 20 square feet, and the horizontal stabilizer was also enlarged. An additional underwing hardpoint was fitted, bringing the total number of hardpoints to 9.

In 1977, the US Air Force announced it would buy an additional 783 F-16A/B's, which were going to enter service as fighter-bombers. The large orders (and subsequent orders) were spread over consecutive years, and F-16s have been ordered and delivered to the USAF in virtually every fiscal year. In total, 2,230 production F-16s have been ordered by the US Air Force. USAF orders (especially the early orders) were not for specific blocks of F-16s - when General Dynamics started producing a new block, they started delivering it to USAF. In the late 90s, the USAF placed a production extension order. The sole purpose of this order was to keep the Fort Worth production line open. At that time, the line was scheduled to close in 1999.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic