| Author |
Message |
|
shingen
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2012 - 10:40 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| The # of missiles issue comes up for several reasons. One is that Mr. Sukhoi Rules, Just Look at These Pretty Pictures says it's a big deal because AMRAAM is easily jammed. This Greatest Armchair Military Analyst of All Time came to that conclusion because information about crosseye jamming has surfaced in open sources and the latest Sukhois have big wingtip pods. The T-10 series can carry lots of missiles and since the T-10 is sooooo much better than the F-35 and the T-10 carries more missiles than the F-35 than lots of missiles must be good. The Typhoon carries more missiles than the F-35 so the Typhoon Fanboys constantly play up # of missiles. Note that the Gold Standard of A2A, the F-15, carries 4 BVR missiles. I am under the understanding that fuel capacity is more an issue for the number of engagements that can be carried out than # of missiles. Once the USSR fell sheer numbers of enemy air isn't a big deal so I'm not sure where this focus on # of missiles comes from. The most interesting thing is that all it carries is AMRAAM. That would be a more interesting topic to discuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 25, 2013 - 7:41 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hcobb
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2012 - 10:41 PM
|
|
|
Banned
Joined: Jul 27, 2009 - 04:31 PM
Posts: 222
Location: North California
Status: Offline
|
So the F-35 ultimate stealth missile loadout is 6xAMRAAMs and 2xASRAAMs or just about exactly the same as the F-22.
The F-22 can give its missiles more of a running start however. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2012 - 10:49 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
hcobb wrote:
So the F-35 ultimate stealth missile loadout is 6xAMRAAMs and 2xASRAAMs or just about exactly the same as the F-22.
The F-22 can give its missiles more of a running start however.
I don't believe that the ASRAAMs can be carried internally along with the AMRAAMs.
"Note that the Gold Standard of A2A, the F-15, carries 4 BVR missiles."
This is true in the older versions, however modernized USAF birds carry 8 AIM-120s. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2012 - 10:49 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| No WVR missiles internally for F-35 unless something has changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2012 - 11:04 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Check out: F-15e.info
The most it carried was 6 AMRAAMs and 2 AIM-9s (and even then only rarely), never 8 BVRs.
On the WVR front, the 120D is especially designed to extend the 120's WVR/HOBS capability. |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hcobb
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 12:15 AM
|
|
|
Banned
Joined: Jul 27, 2009 - 04:31 PM
Posts: 222
Location: North California
Status: Offline
|
| The keyword here is "ASRAAM", which stands for external stealthy missile. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
lamoey
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 12:33 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 699
Location: 77006
Status: Offline
|
|
hcobb wrote:
The keyword here is "ASRAAM", which stands for external stealthy missile.
You ought to check your facts before stating any. Any stealth it may have is a pure coincident.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-132_ASRAAM |
_________________ Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Thumper3181
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 05:53 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 23, 2006 - 06:49 AM
Posts: 626
Status: Offline
|
|
southernphantom wrote:
hcobb wrote:
So the F-35 ultimate stealth missile loadout is 6xAMRAAMs and 2xASRAAMs or just about exactly the same as the F-22.
The F-22 can give its missiles more of a running start however.
I don't believe that the ASRAAMs can be carried internally along with the AMRAAMs.
"Note that the Gold Standard of A2A, the F-15, carries 4 BVR missiles."
This is true in the older versions, however modernized USAF birds carry 8 AIM-120s.
The Super Hornet can carry 14 AIM-120s, but just like the F-15 you will rarely if ever see more than 4 carries due to limitations on fuel, operational experience and drag. But, if you like the F-35 could easily carry 4 AIM-120s internally and another four externally, yet still have greater tactical performance than an F-15 as it is carrying all of it's fuel internally. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 06:16 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| No, the F-18E can carry 12 AMRAAMs and 2 AIM-9s (as the wingtip stations cannot carry an AMRAAM). |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 05:36 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
Check out: F-15e.info
The most it carried was 6 AMRAAMs and 2 AIM-9s (and even then only rarely), never 8 BVRs.
On the WVR front, the 120D is especially designed to extend the 120's WVR/HOBS capability.
The F-15 is capable of carrrying 8 AMRAAMS, but the 6+2, is the typical configuration, giving a good mix of BVR/WVR capability. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 05:38 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
No, the F-18E can carry 12 AMRAAMs and 2 AIM-9s (as the wingtip stations cannot carry an AMRAAM).
IIRC, the Super Hornet can carry 6 under each wing, plus 2 on the fuselage, plus 2 9X on the wing tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 07:17 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
The outer pylon can only hold a single AMRAAM, not the double AAM launcher.
There is not enough clearance on the outer pylon for another double launcher.
 |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 07:54 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
That's actually an AIM-7 on the outboard pylon, but I see your point  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
navy_airframer
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 08:30 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 14, 2011 - 12:41 AM
Posts: 51
Status: Offline
|
| But the hip stations on either side of the intake can each carry a single 120. That makes for a total of 12 120s and 2 AIM-9s plus you can still carry your 480 gal external tank. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 09:11 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4277
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Yes, that is what I said, 12xAMRAAM and 2xSidewinder (plus a centerline).
Just for the fun of it, can the F-18E/F carry AAMs on the centerline? |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|