| Author |
Message |
|
hcobb
|
 Posted: Jan 07, 2012 - 04:25 AM
|
 
|
|
Banned
Joined: Jul 27, 2009 - 04:31 PM
Posts: 222
Location: North California
Status: Offline
|
http://defense-update.com/20120106_sout ... -deal.html
The FA-50 aircraft ordered are expected to be equipped with the Link 16 tactical link, Elta Systems EL/M-2032 pulse Doppler radar, radar warning systems and a night vision imagery system. Northrop Grumman and Raytheon previously selected the FA-50 as a prime candidate for being outfitted with the same version of active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar slated for use in a United States Air Force F-16 upgrade.
Of course it would first have to have 4th gen maneuverability to qualify... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 22, 2013 - 12:45 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
geogen
|
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2012 - 05:53 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
| I don't know about that, but their special Air-show variant T-50 can sure as heck fly with grace, agility and control like few other conventional aircraft I've ever seen fly. Just add extra power, fuel and avionics to that I guess. Seems like a winner... good for them. |
_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightndattic
|
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2012 - 04:25 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 01:43 PM
Posts: 493
Location: Dallas, Texas
Status: Offline
|
It certainly meets the requirements of a gen 4 aircraft. Depending on how integrated the avionics are and if any signature reduction measures are used would determine the additional half generation.
BTW... the T/A-50 would be ideal for the CONUS defense role. Small, cheap radar, gun and 2 -9X's is all you would need to chase down a hijacked airliner or wayward Cessna. I don't know why smaller states such as Switzerland or even the Baltic republics don't go for something like this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
southernphantom
|
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2012 - 09:12 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 745
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
Lightndattic wrote:
It certainly meets the requirements of a gen 4 aircraft. Depending on how integrated the avionics are and if any signature reduction measures are used would determine the additional half generation.
BTW... the T/A-50 would be ideal for the CONUS defense role. Small, cheap radar, gun and 2 -9X's is all you would need to chase down a hijacked airliner or wayward Cessna. I don't know why smaller states such as Switzerland or even the Baltic republics don't go for something like this.
Copy all. Maybe we could use these as a gap-filler to prevent the idiocy of giving ANG units UAVs. They ARE the primary NORAD alert units, and a flying snowmobile isn't exactly useful for interception. I'd be all for a lease of 60 or so. It could also help the Baltic republics perform their own air defense instead of relying on NATO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
destroid
|
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2012 - 06:56 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 05, 2011 - 12:20 PM
Posts: 58
Status: Offline
|
| I guess it would compete pretty directly with the Gripen, very similar weight and virtually the same powerplant. The T-50 looks a fair bit cheaper, going by wikipedia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
geogen
|
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2012 - 09:49 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
|
southernphantom wrote:
Lightndattic wrote:
BTW... the T/A-50 would be ideal for the CONUS defense role. Small, cheap radar, gun and 2 -9X's is all you would need to chase down a hijacked airliner or wayward Cessna. I don't know why smaller states such as Switzerland or even the Baltic republics don't go for something like this.
Copy all. Maybe we could use these as a gap-filler to prevent the idiocy of giving ANG units UAVs. They ARE the primary NORAD alert units, and a flying snowmobile isn't exactly useful for interception. I'd be all for a lease of 60 or so. It could also help the Baltic republics perform their own air defense instead of relying on NATO.
FWIW, there's a blogger who actually posts here as well as posts under his blog elpdefensenews who has in fact postulated on that very hypothetical T/F-50 ANG option way back in I believe 2009. Interesting proposal anyway. |
_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightndattic
|
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2012 - 09:30 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 01:43 PM
Posts: 493
Location: Dallas, Texas
Status: Offline
|
|
geogen wrote:
southernphantom wrote:
Lightndattic wrote:
BTW... the T/A-50 would be ideal for the CONUS defense role. Small, cheap radar, gun and 2 -9X's is all you would need to chase down a hijacked airliner or wayward Cessna. I don't know why smaller states such as Switzerland or even the Baltic republics don't go for something like this.
Copy all. Maybe we could use these as a gap-filler to prevent the idiocy of giving ANG units UAVs. They ARE the primary NORAD alert units, and a flying snowmobile isn't exactly useful for interception. I'd be all for a lease of 60 or so. It could also help the Baltic republics perform their own air defense instead of relying on NATO.
FWIW, there's a blogger who actually posts here as well as posts under his blog elpdefensenews who has in fact postulated on that very hypothetical T/F-50 ANG option way back in I believe 2009. Interesting proposal anyway.
Yeah, that's one of the few things Eric and I agree on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 12:11 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4272
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Me too...  |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
