| Author |
Message |
|
hb_pencil
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 12:44 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 542
Status: Offline
|
|
marco9 wrote:
Italian F-35A/Bs = Romanian F-16C/Ds Blk 52. Non-sense expense. It would be just a European tribute to the US.
Solution? Simple. Italy is an Eurofighter Typhoon partner. Just do like the Germans , France with the Rafale and Sweden with the Gripen. With YOUR taxes, buy YOUR fighter, built by YOUR workers, with full technology access by YOU, give the money to YOUR people, no one will complain about this circle.
Except when the people see the price tag, see its marginal capabilities and learn of cheaper alternatives. You can spend 90 million Euros on a fighter that can barely drop bombs and is extremely expensive to operate, or 60 million for a fighter that can do everything you want it to.
The age of national champions and protected domestic aviation industries is over. Its not affordable for one country to build a fighter, or carve out defined contributions areas like the Eurofighter program did. Its horribly expensive and produces sub-standard results.
The domestic participation approach of the JSF really is aimed at supporting those sub-contractors in Italy and other countries that are the best at their respective areas. Italian producers already know this system well: Alenia does major subcontract work for Boeing's civil aviation business (like building tail pieces for the 787 dreamliner. Instead of supporting a wide range of inefficient industries, the JSF program pushes Italians to support their most efficient and innovative firms.
marco9 wrote:
The Typhoon, with its normal lifespan upgrades, will probably qualify for any NATO standard for the next 30-40 years, just like the Tornados or the F-16A/Bs did at the end of the ‘70ies.
WEll given the British are considering withdrawing their Eurofighters by 2030.... I think that's highly debatable. And most aircraft have a usable lifespan of 30 years. Beyond that they start to encounter severe flight restrictions and costing the taxpayer far more money to keep flying.
marco9 wrote:
15 billions EUR for 600-800 jobs. let's rise it to 1000 even. 15,000,000.00 EUR for a Job. I don't think that any US congressman would allow importing anything expensive like this.
I guess you need to read more about the F-35 program. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 25, 2013 - 3:23 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 04:22 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 652
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
marco9 wrote:
15 billions EUR for 600-800 jobs. let's rise it to 1000 even. 15,000,000.00 EUR for a Job. I don't think that any US congressman would allow importing anything expensive like this.
That is a lot for 1000 jobs! And here, all this time, I thought that came with a bunch of brand new freshly designed, tested, and manufactured 5th generation aircraft!
Silly me!  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
FlightDreamz
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 04:35 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
|
The F-35B is the only way Italy can maintain Naval airpower with no other future Harrier replacements on the horizon and Italy certainly couldn't afford conventional aircraft carriers! Not just Italy for that matter, I suspect a lot of countries might be interested in the F-35B when (if?) it reaches production. As to whom Italy would need to fight, and how they could fund the purchase I have no answers.  |
_________________ A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Conan
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 08:43 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 27, 2007 - 08:23 AM
Posts: 964
Status: Offline
|
|
geogen wrote:
With regards to Spuds comments above - paraphrased; "Good thing the USAF is not going to war now", or in the near-term one could add (hopefully), that sort of criticism is perfectly justified and has in fact been a large part of the basis behind many critics for years now. P.S. I actually don't perceive Spud as a so-called 'cheerleader' of sorts, as Spud has indeed been posting latest news related items be they positively spun news or not so positive.
A very good thing, because all those PAK-FA's, J-20's, Su-35's, the so-called "reference threats" out there would absolutely eat up the legacy F-15's, F-16's and F/A-18's out there wouldn't they?
Oh wait...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 03:12 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
Conan wrote:
geogen wrote:
With regards to Spuds comments above - paraphrased; "Good thing the USAF is not going to war now", or in the near-term one could add (hopefully), that sort of criticism is perfectly justified and has in fact been a large part of the basis behind many critics for years now. P.S. I actually don't perceive Spud as a so-called 'cheerleader' of sorts, as Spud has indeed been posting latest news related items be they positively spun news or not so positive.
A very good thing, because all those PAK-FA's, J-20's, Su-35's, the so-called "reference threats" out there would absolutely eat up the legacy F-15's, F-16's and F/A-18's out there wouldn't they?
Oh wait...
We're not buying planes now, to deal with threats now. We're buying planes to deal with threats for the next 40yrs or more. Enemy airpower and SAMs aren't going to rest on their laurels. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Conan
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 03:53 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 27, 2007 - 08:23 AM
Posts: 964
Status: Offline
|
|
wrightwing wrote:
We're not buying planes now, to deal with threats now. We're buying planes to deal with threats for the next 40yrs or more. Enemy airpower and SAMs aren't going to rest on their laurels.
I agree, I was addressing Geogen's point (it seems to me, based on his history here) that the USAF is out-matched somehow by the "advanced threats" being rolled out by China and Russia, despite the reality that neither China or Russia has a more capable individual fighter in-service than the F-15C, let alone the F-22A and won't for decades given the glacial pace of development of modern fighters in both countries, let alone advanced 5th generation designs.
All those "reference threats" are a decade or more away from providing any TRUE capability. The ability to fly a few circuits, look good in photos and equal it's landings and take-offs is not what most military forces refers to as a "capability" but they are certainly good enough for many on the www as proof of over-matching "capability" from the future Russian and Chinese designs.
If that's not what Geogen was referring to, I'll eat my hat... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2012 - 04:09 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
Conan wrote:
wrightwing wrote:
We're not buying planes now, to deal with threats now. We're buying planes to deal with threats for the next 40yrs or more. Enemy airpower and SAMs aren't going to rest on their laurels.
I agree, I was addressing Geogen's point (it seems to me, based on his history here) that the USAF is out-matched somehow by the "advanced threats" being rolled out by China and Russia, despite the reality that neither China or Russia has a more capable individual fighter in-service than the F-15C, let alone the F-22A and won't for decades given the glacial pace of development of modern fighters in both countries, let alone advanced 5th generation designs.
All those "reference threats" are a decade or more away from providing any TRUE capability. The ability to fly a few circuits, look good in photos and equal it's landings and take-offs is not what most military forces refers to as a "capability" but they are certainly good enough for many on the www as proof of over-matching "capability" from the future Russian and Chinese designs.
If that's not what Geogen was referring to, I'll eat my hat...
Gotcha. I would concur. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
m
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2012 - 12:02 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
|
|
marco9 wrote:
Italian F-35A/Bs = Romanian F-16C/Ds Blk 52. Non-sense expense. It would be just a European tribute to the US.
Solution? Simple. Italy is an Eurofighter Typhoon partner. Just do like the Germans , France with the Rafale and Sweden with the Gripen. With YOUR taxes, buy YOUR fighter, built by YOUR workers, with full technology access by YOU, give the money to YOUR people, no one will complain about this circle.
The Typhoon, with its normal lifespan upgrades, will probably qualify for any NATO standard for the next 30-40 years, just like the Tornados or the F-16A/Bs did at the end of the ‘70ies.
If a European Country has to buy any military hardware (and they don’t), they should just quit wasting European money on American goodies, simple as this.
15 billions EUR for 600-800 jobs. let's rise it to 1000 even. 15,000,000.00 EUR for a Job. I don't think that any US congressman would allow importing anything expensive like this.
What you are claiming here makes no sense. This is not only about jobs, you totally forget the impact on knowledge industry. Not only military, but for civil industry as well. For instance designing new production methods and production machines. In fact this is more important, keeping industry advanced, than jobs. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
velocityvector
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2012 - 03:10 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 25, 2009 - 05:21 AM
Posts: 171
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
|
| Seems we are maintaining the design knowledge base. Operating platforms, not so much. The business model needs to change. The true enemy is financing, let's direct our attention to it. Contractors have been bending us over **** backwards for generations and I, for one, do not wish to receive any more painful abuse. That tends to make me fly funny. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
thestealthfighterguy
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2012 - 03:38 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2011 - 02:18 AM
Posts: 254
Location: Your six-O-clock
|
|
velocityvector wrote:
Who do the Italians need to defend against? The Turks will clean the Italian clock, so-to-speak. And there isn't anybody else in the neighborhood the Italians should worry themselves about. Curious. The Italians cannot afford and they do not require F-35. The platform is a waste of money - which they do not have.
"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far."
A proverb advising the tactic of caution and non-aggression, backed up by the ability to do violence if required.
The widespread use of 'speak softly and carry a big stick' began with American president Theodore Roosevelt. In a letter to Henry L. Sprague, on January 26th 1900
like the earlier phrase 'the iron fist in the velvet glove', was to begin gently, but hold a decisive weapon in reserve.
TSFG |
_________________ Stealth, so the bad guys don't know your there till they start blowing up. Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
velocityvector
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2012 - 04:28 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 25, 2009 - 05:21 AM
Posts: 171
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
|
| Respectfully offered. We've been clubbing baby harp seals for decades. The big animal sticks are our strategic and anti-strategic defensive systems as well as our surveillance. Italy lives under this umbrella nonchalantly. It would be swell to have the Italians acquire F-35 for interoperability. But not if this breaks their bank or they end up with diminished capability vice what they can afford or we, the US, can afford to comp them. Economies and contractor practices, as well as software development, are the primary challenges today. So big stick against whom with the Italian Job? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sewerrat
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2012 - 11:36 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 23, 2009 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 286
Status: Offline
|
|
velocityvector wrote:
Respectfully offered. We've been clubbing baby harp seals for decades. The big animal sticks are our strategic and anti-strategic defensive systems as well as our surveillance. Italy lives under this umbrella nonchalantly. It would be swell to have the Italians acquire F-35 for interoperability. But not if this breaks their bank or they end up with diminished capability vice what they can afford or we, the US, can afford to comp them. Economies and contractor practices, as well as software development, are the primary challenges today. So big stick against whom with the Italian Job?
Ah....... since the mid60s there's been hit pieces on everything the US invests money into. I'd like to see the liberal media go after something like the Pak-Fa, J-20, yatta, yatta, yatta....... Or for that matter the Iranian (cough!) long range missiles.
This story has never chnaged over the decades. I remember when they had hit pieces against the F-15 in the 70s, the F-16 in the 80s, the F-117 in the very late 1980s. The plout line never changes, and we keep getting better and better equipments. I remember when the B1-A was cancelled and brought back to life. If at the height of the cold war we let these a**holes get an interncontinental bomber terminatted, then now today their words carry a lot further than before.
I'm simply rambling on as I forgot what my main point was going to be.... Anyway, looking forward to finally seeing the -35A! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
thestealthfighterguy
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2012 - 04:21 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2011 - 02:18 AM
Posts: 254
Location: Your six-O-clock
|
|
velocityvector wrote:
Respectfully offered. We've been clubbing baby harp seals for decades. The big animal sticks are our strategic and anti-strategic defensive systems as well as our surveillance. Italy lives under this umbrella nonchalantly. It would be swell to have the Italians acquire F-35 for interoperability. But not if this breaks their bank or they end up with diminished capability vice what they can afford or we, the US, can afford to comp them. Economies and contractor practices, as well as software development, are the primary challenges today. So big stick against whom with the Italian Job?
IMO, we (the US ) need to stop being a cop and the world knows we may not be the one saving their butts forever. Ever read about WWI? How about WWII? If you did you know after both of them everyone said this was the last war. Both times they were wrong. So many people think WWIII will never happen. They're wrong. It will come, and not the way people think. It's always a new type of war. The rest of the world knows this. Most of the US people have been told for over 20 years that the "Cold war" is over. They're wrong, it just changed. The new war is going to be over food, fuel, water, and freedom (aka people's right to live how they want). In this new war it will be more importmant to protect your home land than attack. Air power is the most important fighting force. No one has won a war without control of the sky in 100 years. If you need to make cuts it should not be to your airforce. If they own your skys they own you. The Italians know this. I know, I know many of them. They remember what blitzkrieg did. Ask the iraqi republican guard what they did when a pair of B-52's flaten the tank battalion on each side of them with one pass. you know what they did? They ran away from their tanks screaming, because there was nothing they could do but run or die. The rest of the world remembers what airpower can do, when will our people?
My TSFG |
_________________ Stealth, so the bad guys don't know your there till they start blowing up. Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2012 - 04:29 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 652
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2012 - 04:36 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
thestealthfighterguy wrote:
velocityvector wrote:
Respectfully offered. We've been clubbing baby harp seals for decades. The big animal sticks are our strategic and anti-strategic defensive systems as well as our surveillance. Italy lives under this umbrella nonchalantly. It would be swell to have the Italians acquire F-35 for interoperability. But not if this breaks their bank or they end up with diminished capability vice what they can afford or we, the US, can afford to comp them. Economies and contractor practices, as well as software development, are the primary challenges today. So big stick against whom with the Italian Job?
IMO, we (the US ) need to stop being a cop and the world knows we may not be the one saving their butts forever. Ever read about WWI? How about WWII? If you did you know after both of them everyone said this was the last war. Both times they were wrong. So many people think WWIII will never happen. They're wrong. It will come, and not the way people think. It's always a new type of war. The rest of the world knows this. Most of the US people have been told for over 20 years that the "Cold war" is over. They're wrong, it just changed. The new war is going to be over food, fuel, water, and freedom (aka people's right to live how they want). In this new war it will be more importmant to protect your home land than attack. Air power is the most important fighting force. No one has won a war without control of the sky in 100 years. If you need to make cuts it should not be to your airforce. If they own your skys they own you. The Italians know this. I know, I know many of them. They remember what blitzkrieg did. Ask the iraqi republican guard what they did when a pair of B-52's flaten the tank battalion on each side of them with one pass. you know what they did? They ran away from their tanks screaming, because there was nothing they could do but run or die. The rest of the world remembers what airpower can do, when will our people?
My  TSFG
Your :2c; was well-received by this redneck Phanatic. Every time I hear about a squadron losing its Vipers or being deactivated, I have a mini-rage against BRAC and politically-motivated drawdowns. We have total superiority over all of the EU if that is necessary, but a world war (of the type that I agree is inevitable) would stretch our forces dangerously thin. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|