Forum: F-35 Armament, Stores and Tactics

F-35 carrying B-61 tactical nuke compromises its stealth?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2011 - 07:50 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
I might be of some assistance here as this happens to be my area of study. The actual warhead (known as the "physics package" in that field) does not emit enough radiation to be detectable at any appreciable distance because of background radiation and the neutron reflectors that surround the actual fizzle material. You'll probably get more radiation from a day at the beach than the guys in this picture ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:W80_n ... arhead.jpg ) who are handling a W-80 weapon similar to that used on the B-61.

Note: Look at the hand on the weapon to gauge its size, not the Hitler lookalike in the background.


Last edited by 1st503rdsgt on Aug 22, 2011 - 08:00 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 5:08 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor







Last edited by 1st503rdsgt on Aug 22, 2011 - 08:00 AM; edited 1 time in total
  Send private message  
 
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2011 - 07:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
deleted
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
wrightwing
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2011 - 02:31 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2022

Status: Offline
axaxaava wrote:
Thanks guys. Well, there was a Russian dude clamming that their radars are very powerful enough to detect anything emancipating from a jet. So a nuke on a jet is easily detected due to its radiation. Their radars even can detect any stealth fighter. He sited that an old Yugoslavian SA-3 Goa's (approx 20 yrs older than F-117) shot F-117 down. So, are those statements true?
Radar can't detect nuclear radiation first of all. Secondly, stealth doesn't mean invisibility- it just means that the range at which radars can detect it, are greatly reduced. The Yugoslavian SA-3 was only able to detect the F-117 due to the fact, that the crew knew the flight path beforehand, and were able to position themselves advantageously. Had they located a few miles away, they never would've seen it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Prinz_Eugn
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2011 - 07:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 03, 2008 - 04:35 AM
Posts: 859

Status: Offline
axaxaava wrote:
Thanks guys. Well, there was a Russian dude clamming that their radars are very powerful enough to detect anything emancipating from a jet. So a nuke on a jet is easily detected due to its radiation. Their radars even can detect any stealth fighter. He sited that an old Yugoslavian SA-3 Goa's (approx 20 yrs older than F-117) shot F-117 down. So, are those statements true?


He doesn't understand basic physics... the radiation you get from nuclear decay is made up of Alpha and Beta particles (not even electromagnetic waves, like radio or visible light), and Gamma rays, which are so different it would be like trying to see microwaves with your eyes.

_________________
"A visitor from Mars could easily pick out the civilized nations. They have the best implements of war."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic