| Author |
Message |
|
spazsinbad
|
 Posted: Jun 18, 2011 - 01:18 PM
|
 
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
How to land on an aircraft carrier without jump jets 16 June 2011 | UK By Will Inglis
http://bfbs.com/news/uk/how-land-aircra ... 48705.html [VIDEO on page]
"Work has started on how to fly fast jets from Britain’s next generation aircraft carriers.
The decision was taken late last year to fly conventional catapult launched planes from the ships instead of more expensive harrier style aircraft that can land vertically.
But that has caused all kinds of headaches, and the designers have resorted to a simulator at BAE System's aircraft factory at Warton to sort them out.
By the time the Queen Elizabeth class carriers enter service it will be more than four decades since British pilots have operated from a conventional carrier – and that means lots of key skills have been lost in the mists of time."
SCREENSHOT of .FLV Video 9.5Mb |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
67.45 KB |
| Viewed: |
12000 Time(s) |
|
_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 21, 2013 - 9:51 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2011 - 09:57 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Oct 31, 2011 - 10:26 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Feb 11, 2012 - 02:30 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2012 - 12:03 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
CVF Foul Line for Deck Landings (red line) crosses the (EMALS) catapult as shown so neither the wasist nor bow catapult can be used during F-35C landing ops. I'm told this is seldom done these days - even in USN - to have simultaneous cats and arrests as in the days of yore. I'm told EMALS is able to launch successively faster than equivalent steam catapults and the UK RN FAA willl not have a lot of F-35Cs onboard CVF to launch anyways.  |
_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
|
|
firstimpulse
|
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2012 - 03:21 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Jan 12, 2012 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 311
Status: Offline
|
| 0.0 Cool! But... last I heard the F-35C wasn't able to land on a carrier deck because of an arrestor hook issue that hadn't been worked out yet. Has it been fixed? Or did I just stumble upon some F-35 haters? |
_________________
Knowledge fuels imagination.
http://www.amazon.com/Cyfer-1-0-Cyferve ... B008HM57CO
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2012 - 03:50 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
munny
|
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2012 - 08:03 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 13, 2010 - 01:39 AM
Posts: 529
Status: Offline
|
Can't help but see the humor in the situation 
Maybe the BAE software needs a redesign so it only supports touch and goes and bolter training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2012 - 08:34 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Mar 03, 2012 - 10:11 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Mar 03, 2012 - 01:30 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
A smidgeon fast according to Optimum AoA ladder indication and half a ball high and right of centreline from this screenshot of pilot HMDS view from above F-35C Simulator video. Video Clip is at one eigth speed.
Right Click on the playing video to get 'FULL Screen' for some White Line Fever!  |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
83.37 KB |
| Viewed: |
7548 Time(s) |
|
_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
Last edited by spazsinbad on Mar 04, 2012 - 07:06 AM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
munny
|
|
Posted: Mar 03, 2012 - 02:31 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 13, 2010 - 01:39 AM
Posts: 529
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
Why?
The whole hook debacle which according to some well informed "experts" is "unfixable" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sferrin
|
|
Posted: Mar 03, 2012 - 03:44 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613
Status: Offline
|
|
munny wrote:
spazsinbad wrote:
Why?
The whole hook debacle which according to some well informed "experts" is "unfixable"
They're going to look pretty silly when it gets fixed. Not that it'll keep them from flapping their yaps. |
_________________
"There I was. . ."
|
|
|
|
|
|
FlightDreamz
|
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2012 - 06:50 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
|
Plus one to what sferrin said!  While it is extremely annoying that the F-35C tailhook doesn't work right (yet) I believe it is a fixable problem.
More concerning to me are the price increases, thus less aircraft ordered, thus begins the downward death spiral, see F-22 Raptor (presently capped at 183 planes), B-2 Spirit (20 left out of the 21 built), etc. etc. But with commitments to sell this to our allies (if only they weren't broke too) once the F-35 comes out of development it's numbers will increase (hopefully) time will tell.
Now if someone (Britain maybe?) would put a @#$%!! internal GUN on the F-35C (and no, the gun pod doesn't count)! Sigh... |
_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
spazsinbad
|
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2012 - 08:45 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7839
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
