| Author |
Message |
|
EOR
|
 Posted: Nov 23, 2010 - 11:45 PM
|
 
|
|
Active Member
Joined: May 19, 2008 - 05:52 PM
Posts: 114
Location: las vegas, nevada
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 12:11 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
wysongj
|
|
Posted: Nov 24, 2010 - 02:48 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 21, 2008 - 02:43 PM
Posts: 25
Status: Offline
|
| Did anyone think that maybe the paint shop goofed? They are only human, and I've seen it in person picking up my C-130 from PDM. I was in the West Virginia Air Guard, and our plane had "South Carolina Air Guard" painted on the side. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon
|
|
Posted: Nov 24, 2010 - 05:50 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374
Status: Offline
|
|
wysongj wrote:
Did anyone think that maybe the paint shop goofed? They are only human, and I've seen it in person picking up my C-130 from PDM. I was in the West Virginia Air Guard, and our plane had "South Carolina Air Guard" painted on the side. Just a thought.
Yes, mismatched tail number was meantioned in previous posts by scorpion and I. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mongoose
|
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2011 - 01:28 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 07:39 PM
Posts: 2
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
No mistake, the tail number is accurate. I don't know the exact details of why that is the case, but it may have something to do with the fact that -132 was on a separate contract as a "replacement test aircraft".
Anyway, here's a couple of pictures for you guys. First one is the actual serial # plate inside the wheel well. As you can see, it is # 06-4132.
Second one is a closer shot of the tail flash. There are also some other unique paint details on the aircraft, with the F-22 CTF patch on the left side in front of the SWB, and an EDW patch on the same spot on the right, but I don't have shots of those.
Cheers,
-Jason |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
340.44 KB |
| Viewed: |
7423 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
63.09 KB |
| Viewed: |
7417 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
railmonkey
|
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2011 - 12:02 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 11, 2011 - 02:32 PM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
Hey all,
I was on the F22 project up until last year. A132 was held back for testing and data gathering. If I remember correctly it was still there (Marietta) when I left Mar 2010. Or it may have just been delivered prior to me leaving.
Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon
|
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2011 - 04:42 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374
Status: Offline
|
Ok, amazing stuff this. Thank you Jason for these helpful photos. Clearly the sequence is strange:
07-4131 (first of the FY 2007 serials and we have photo proof)
06-4132 (note FY 2006, now photo proof)
07-4133 (back to FY 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asif
|
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2011 - 10:10 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2801
|
|
Jon wrote:
06-4132 (note FY 2006, now photo proof)
 USAF F-22A block 30 no. 07-4132 seen at Lockheed Martin's Marietta facility being towed during RTA roll-out on September 2nd, 2009. |
_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
