| Author |
Message |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Nov 09, 2009 - 10:15 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006 - 04:06 PM
Posts: 252
Status: Offline
|
What happens when you run a missile launcher or missile interface check on the station in question with the -501 tester?
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 24, 2013 - 9:05 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bestbuy
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2009 - 03:20 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 25, 2009 - 03:10 PM
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
| There are grounding points on each [Link pending approval] i think you have to look and measure the grounding points each matrixes [Link pending approval] must be a corrosion preventing station 1/2 or 8/9 matrixes getting [Link pending approval] luck!.. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
edwinbland
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2010 - 10:30 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 07, 2010 - 10:21 PM
Posts: 2
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
The video tests appear to require a service person in the cockpit to confirm the test pattern. The early versions appear to have all been black & white. I've not been able to locate the documentation on when the systems were upgraded to color displays. I believe it was part of the Mid Life [Link pending approval] but we've had difficulty obtaining these specifications from LM. Any suggestions?
What distinguished the 501 separate from the MBFI? The 501 specifications call for the AMUX & WMux bus tests separately in great detail. Was the MBFI a GD/LM product or did someone else build it? Does the MBFI test AMUX as well as WMUX bus subsystems? There was also a sister product of the [Link pending approval] called the 500 [Link pending approval] what was its purpose in life? Was it a subset of the 501 tester?
Regards,
Edwin Bland,
Fort Worth, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aduysak
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2010 - 10:53 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 10, 2007 - 07:27 AM
Posts: 3
Status: Offline
|
| Arkadasim eger arizan üzerinde çalisirken gerçek teknik destek almak istersen , üslerdeki önce aviyonik teknik destek astsubayini [Link pending approval] teknik destek [Link pending approval] gerekirse biz Lockheed [Link pending approval] ile iletisim [Link pending approval] |
Last edited by aduysak on Jul 07, 2010 - 11:05 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aduysak
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2010 - 11:03 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 10, 2007 - 07:27 AM
Posts: 3
Status: Offline
|
| Viper0007 ,If you have a SMS failure that could not fix ,You must call in your base The Turkish Avionics or APG Technical Advisor NCO(Turkish [Link pending approval]) who will give you real F-16 Technical support you [Link pending approval] can not find a solution for repairing your failure my young weapon guy in these [Link pending approval] [Link pending approval] maybe you do not know There are lots of F-16 configurations in the world about 30 [Link pending approval] |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Jul 08, 2010 - 04:03 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006 - 04:06 PM
Posts: 252
Status: Offline
|
|
edwinbland wrote:
What distinguished the 501 separate from the MBFI? The 501 specifications call for the AMUX & WMux bus tests separately in great detail. Was the MBFI a GD/LM product or did someone else build it? Does the MBFI test AMUX as well as WMUX bus subsystems? There was also a sister product of the 501... called the 500 tester... what was its purpose in life? Was it a subset of the 501 tester?
Regards,
Edwin Bland,
Fort Worth, TX
The MBFI is for troubleshooting mux problems, the -501 is the flightline tester for troubleshooting & testing weapon problems on aircraft. The -500 is the backshop tester for testing and troubleshooting AME equipment off aircraft..ie,.. racks, launchers, pylons..etc..
Cheers,
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mckenzy7
|
Posted: Jul 08, 2010 - 06:12 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 07, 2005 - 11:05 AM
Posts: 100
Location: Crestview Florida
Status: Offline
|
| The Lockheed Rep is going to tell you to start shooting wires, even though I know you would rather yank out some of your teeth, this maybe your only option since you do not have a MBFI, and it could take you years to get one. One of the wires has a higher than normal resistance reading, you will need to find it. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
edwinbland
|
Posted: Jul 09, 2010 - 06:21 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 07, 2010 - 10:21 PM
Posts: 2
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
|
ViperDude wrote:
edwinbland wrote:
What distinguished the 501 separate from the MBFI? The 501 specifications call for the AMUX & WMux bus tests separately in great detail. Was the MBFI a GD/LM product or did someone else build it? Does the MBFI test AMUX as well as WMUX bus subsystems? There was also a sister product of the [Link pending approval] called the 500 [Link pending approval] what was its purpose in life? Was it a subset of the 501 tester?
Regards,
Edwin Bland,
Fort Worth, TX
The MBFI is for troubleshooting mux problems, the -501 is the flightline tester for troubleshooting & testing weapon problems on aircraft. The -500 is the backshop tester for testing and troubleshooting AME equipment off [Link pending approval],.. racks, launchers, [Link pending approval]
Cheers,
ViperDude
Thanks ViperDude!
I appreciate you sharing. The 501 functional specification lists AMUX & WMUX testing which it must complete as well. Is the MBFI like a super-set of the 501 MUX testing? Would Lockheed have the specifications for the testing on the MBFI?
Thanks!
Edwin |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
fiskerwad
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2010 - 04:16 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 708
Location: 76101
|
Took a while to find it but T.O. 33D7-75-34-1 is the one I think you need for MBFI operation. The MBFI is just a computerized ohmmeter with all the proper cables to connect to various points of the MUX cabling. I seem to remember it being a creation of GD engineers at Ogden a decade or two ago.
fisk |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mckenzy7
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2010 - 10:02 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 07, 2005 - 11:05 AM
Posts: 100
Location: Crestview Florida
Status: Offline
|
| If they don't have an MBFI, then they are probably not authorized to have the T.O. for it as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|