Forum: Military Aircraft of the Cold War

MiG-21bis



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
huggy
PostPosted: May 22, 2009 - 06:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 27, 2004 - 07:39 AM
Posts: 349

Status: Offline
I believe the MiG-21 would make a great "high end" warbird to own and fly in the US.
It would be a hit on the airshow circuit too, maybe.
Probably not really good for much else.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 5:05 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
equalizer
PostPosted: Jun 20, 2010 - 01:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jun 20, 2010 - 12:53 AM
Posts: 6

Status: Offline
HunterKiller wrote:
Mig-21bis (Fishbed N), 6xR-60 missiles, RP-22 Saphire radar, 2x23 mm gun

In russian aviation books are claims, that 21bis has a momentary climb rate about 240 m/sec and continious turn rate about 10 deg/sec

I heard that Fishbed has spectacular roll rate (about 90 deg sec).

How good this is in real dogfight and how chances are against other planes from that area (F-5E, Mirage III, F-4E, Saab Draken)?

Finnish air force has used them for years (only "Western" force, I think).

[Link pending approval]


My uncle flew Mig 21-Bis for 20 years (Finnish)
I can tell that in dogfight all Saab Dragen models are inferior.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
StolichnayaStrafer
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2010 - 12:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 20, 2008 - 04:50 PM
Posts: 854
Location: Dodge City, Moscowchusetts
Status: Offline
michael82, you seem to be posting about this book a lot...

perhaps you are trying too hard at selling it instead of having a discussion? Idea

This Forum is not about making sales pitches, methinks. Big No No

_________________
Why is the vodka gone?
Why is the vodka always gone... oh- that's why!
Hide the vodka!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
michael82
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2010 - 03:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 02, 2010 - 10:50 AM
Posts: 6

Status: Offline
I'm trying to get similar book with official data about F-14, Viggen, [Link pending approval] anybody knows where I can get them, please let me know. These a/c are not operational any more and instead of imagining and guessing we could read some fact about them. Now, there are plenty of MiG-21 books. This one even compares its performance with F-4 in the same, understandable format.
If anybody wants to discuss here are issues for the beginning:
to what angles of attack Aggressor MiG-21 was flown?
what's its corner velocity?
what limits its max speeds (at low and high altitudes)
how bis engine (R-25) has such a high augmentation ratio or such a low specific thrust?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kryptid
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2010 - 10:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
The Tumansky R-25-300 has a secondary fuel pump in its afterburner section. I've read it referred to as a "super-afterburner" before. I think the pilot has the option of operating in either the normal afterburner setting or the super-afterburner mode; i.e. he doesn't have to go all the way if he doesn't want to. This is good because maximum augmentation greatly reduces the engine's life. Using it too long risks an explosion.

I wonder if there would be any merit to such a system on a more modern engine? Sure, it would reduce engine life and suck up a lot of fuel if used. However, saving it for emergency purposes doesn't seem like such a bad idea.

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
michael82
PostPosted: Jun 24, 2010 - 09:55 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 02, 2010 - 10:50 AM
Posts: 6

Status: Offline
I know that… there are some kind of "war emergency mode" in other engines like in that of Su-27, export [Link pending approval] peace time thrust is lower than published.
I meant to ask how engine has such a high augmentation ratio 6850/4100 (67%), as turbofan engines…how so much air is unused in a core and left for afterburner combustion?

Or such a low specific (military) thrust?
I'm doubting cited R-25 thrust w/o AB although it is official figure.
Specific thrust is very [Link pending approval] engine has very low thrust for air mass flow and given pressure ratio. That indicates turbine inlet temperature lower than in R-11/13. But engine is much newer and published TIT is not low.



a.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  237.13 KB
 Viewed:  4806 Time(s)

a.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
adriann
PostPosted: Mar 17, 2011 - 03:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 17, 2011 - 03:32 PM
Posts: 2
Location: hungary
Status: Offline
HunterKiller wrote:
I have heard from ex-Soviet airmen, that early Mig-23M Flogger B was step backward from Fishbed N, no maneuverability, .


Partly [Link pending approval] is more maneuverable only if flown outside limits !
See:
:
[Link pending approval];s=books&qid=1300287335&sr=1-1
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
squirl
PostPosted: Mar 18, 2011 - 02:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Feb 27, 2005 - 08:13 AM
Posts: 43

Status: Offline
Why the constant sales pitch for that Mig-21 book?

Also, it looks like something (a caption box?) was photoshopped out of the the upper left corner of that plot. Maybe those black dots are data points, with the lines interpolated?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shingen
PostPosted: Mar 18, 2011 - 05:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
These guys spam every forum with their little book. These same guys claim the MiG-21 can beat the F-15 if the fight slows to below 150 knots. Some forums delete the spam others leave it up.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
franjo
PostPosted: Mar 18, 2011 - 02:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 18, 2011 - 02:01 PM
Posts: 4
Location: hungary
Status: Offline
Interestingly I've red that MiG-21 can beat F-15 in slow speed turns, in a book Red Eagles. How it can be done? What is the explanation?

I'd rather read something about that capability than your [Link pending approval] I think you guys are the one who are spamming the topic. I tried to buy the book but it wasn't available
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
shingen
PostPosted: Mar 19, 2011 - 01:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
Find it yourself. It's easily searchable trash spam that's been posted on every forum. Like I said, some have taken the spam down, others have left it up.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
franjo
PostPosted: Mar 21, 2011 - 09:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 18, 2011 - 02:01 PM
Posts: 4
Location: hungary
Status: Offline
I do not really know what other forums are doing but I found this detail useful and [Link pending approval] its treatment made me to [Link pending approval]
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic