Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

Stealth and Shaping



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
IamSpazzy
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 05:56 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 13, 2008 - 02:51 AM
Posts: 10

Status: Offline
If Stealth is primarily about shaping, what's to stop other countries from developing LO platforms by essentially copying the airframe shape from publicly available photos of the F-22/35
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 3:30 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Prinz_Eugn
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 06:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 03, 2008 - 04:35 AM
Posts: 859

Status: Offline
The devil is in the details...

_________________
"A visitor from Mars could easily pick out the civilized nations. They have the best implements of war."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shep1978
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 12:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
I watched a program once about stealth aircraft on t.v. In it they interviewed Dennis Overholser (who is a stealth community legend) He claimed, from my memory that it's all about "shape, shape, shape and then materials."

I'll try and find a transcript of the program to get the exact quote though it could be tricky as it was one of the very many programs on stealth that are floating about on the airwaves.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
wrightwing
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 01:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025

Status: Offline
IamSpazzy wrote:
If Stealth is primarily about shaping, what's to stop other countries from developing LO platforms by essentially copying the airframe shape from publicly available photos of the F-22/35


Shape can certainly help lower the RCS, but....without knowledge of materials, and what's going on beneath the skin, you don't have the full story.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sewerrat
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 09:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 23, 2009 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 286

Status: Offline
With regards to first gen stealth, like the F-117, it is all about shaping. The Russian paper that the LM engineer read and digested is all about how electromagnetic waves reflect back to the transmitter based upon geometry.

But its not as simple as just "copying" design. There's a little thing in engineering called GD&T, and with poor tolerancing in production, even a design that looks stealthy might be as big as a barn door on someones radar set.

Just because you can shape something similar to something else that is known to be LO, that does not make the copy LO. Take a piece of flat aluminum and start making measurements on its flatness and while it may look flat to your eyes, it can be full of deformations that cause it to behave differently to radar reflections than if it were truly "flat".

Airplanes are full of panels, rivets, moving things, and then alone, the stresses involved in flight can cause subtle variations than what it was when it rolled off the production line.

Stealth is part phyics, and just as importantly, it is part manufacturing abilities.

Then again, dirt, grease, and crud that get deposited on a stealthy airframe can also increase its reflectivity.

Anyone in the world can make a "stealth" airplane. But there's a difference between making something operational and stealthy, as opposed to it being some graduate students science experiement. Hell the Germans made a stealth airplane by accident in WWII.

So your original question was something about now that the world knows what stealth America's stealth airplanes look like, can't they just copy them? Our secret F-117 squadron wasn't secret because we were worried that if someone knew what it looked like, then they would copy it. No. It was secret to keep operational capabilities secret - not because the design was magical and if the bad guys knew what it looked like they'd copy it and have its magical capabilities.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
zwz
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 12:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 26, 2009 - 07:17 PM
Posts: 37

Status: Offline
That's impossible.
The RCS is very sensitive to even a variation of curvature. Other countries can't get the detail of the entire parameters by pictures.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kryptid
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 12:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
Building the shape to the required tolerances could be quite difficult for countries which don't have the manufacturing expertise to do so. The distances between the gaps in the panels and control surfaces are important to consider as well.

Although Japan seems to have more-or-less copied the F-22 with their ATD-X. They claim an RCS "smaller than a bird, but larger than an insect" with a test model.

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasdave901
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 03:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 31, 2007 - 11:08 AM
Posts: 226

Status: Offline
Remember what they said about the F-117. If even one of the rivets was protruding 1/16th in. up out of the skin the stealth was blown completely. Anyone not getting the shape or anything else associated with the stealth of the airframe 100% right doesn't get points for having it close, they get nothing.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
DarthAmerica
PostPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 06:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 19, 2006 - 04:17 PM
Posts: 627

Status: Offline
"Stealth" is about a lot of things. Shaping just being a part of it with regard to defeating RF. Anyone who knows how to make Tx/Rx knows how to defeat it. The issue is more a matter of at what cost. That's what seperates theory from practice more often than not.

-DA
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
f22enthusiast
PostPosted: Feb 28, 2010 - 03:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 16, 2008 - 10:41 PM
Posts: 130

Status: Offline
A former F-117 pilot told me that stealth is about 85% shape, 15% everything else.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic