Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

Looking for a 2002 pdf chart expressing need for 762 F-22s



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
bruant328
PostPosted: Dec 30, 2009 - 12:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 18, 2005 - 11:48 PM
Posts: 126

Status: Offline
Anybody know of this pdf from 2002 IIRC calling for 762 F-22s to cover all contingenies?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 8:44 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Dec 30, 2009 - 09:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1305

Status: Offline
Cover all contingencies? I think the number was to replace most of the aging fighter airframes that are now falling apart.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lampshade111
PostPosted: Dec 31, 2009 - 09:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 22, 2008 - 03:17 AM
Posts: 191

Status: Offline
762 F-22s.

Yet the USAF couldn't get 500. Or 380.

I hate the way our country is heading.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
energo
PostPosted: Dec 31, 2009 - 10:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Dec 09, 2007 - 02:06 PM
Posts: 462

Status: Offline
bruant328 wrote:
Anybody know of this pdf from 2002 IIRC calling for 762 F-22s to cover all contingenies?


As far as I know 762 was the planned number during the ATF DEM/VAL phase in the late 80's. This was reduced in the early 90's.

B. Bolsøy
Oslo
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
strykerxo
PostPosted: Jan 01, 2010 - 12:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 21, 2008 - 04:40 AM
Posts: 301

Status: Offline
As with the B-2 (early procurement - 132), the F-22 is so good we only need a relative few, to accomplish our mission requirement. These are the Rambo's of all AC, being superior on so many levels that we dare not have to many. So in an effort to not be looked on as arrogant, the US has decided to share with the world the F-35, forsaking all others, for the sake of commonality and costs.

All good reasons, and not bashing the F-35 too much, but so far the F-22 looks to be the superior airframe. While legacy AC slowly deteriorate and become obsolescent, we will have far fewer replacement AC for re-capitalization and fewer AC options. In hopes that our far more advanced AC live up to their promises, are not overwhelmed by less superior AC and a worthy opponent does not present itself.

Do not be surprised to see the F-35 numbers slashed in favor of the UCAV's, as the F-22 was in favor of the F-35. Savor our manned AC programs because over time there will be less and less use for them, with unmanned AC, cyber warfare, missiles, lasers and urban warfare dominating budgets.

I love AC of all types, foremost fighter AC and they will be around at the air-shows for a long time to come. There is a darker side too and my wish is that we will not have to use them, knowing full well that others will try to exploit weakness to their advantage and evil will raise it's ugly head.

Happy New Year fellow aviation enthusiasts Cheers
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic